Liberal Forum

sootedupCyndi » 07 Nov 2023, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Nov 2023, 1:27 pm

Why them Mr.Kelly? They are a big part of the problem? consider it all of them!
look at the loon  Robert de Niro?
Railed against Trump- like a nut case!!!
Then one of his family members died of a fentanyl pill.!!!
From  Bidens  open borders.. for his Votes! what a loon if you ask me!
It really is time to stop defending liberal policies--- and STOP the insanity!!

+1000
 

Mrkelly » 08 Nov 2023, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑

08 Nov 2023, 10:16 am

I do consider all of them

it’s the celebrities that communicates with the impressionable minds here 

just curious who they are

well yea, just look at yer av...  
 
 

Nostradamus'omh » 08 Nov 2023, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑

08 Nov 2023, 11:10 am

You do comprehend that doesn't mean much in real time. Realities are governed by loyalty to self deception with a promise nobody can identity how living is eternally separated factually through any moral, legal, ethical code of economic values ancestrally used to date?

What happens that always occurs every belief says never existed before? Genetics eternally separates the specific reproductions occupying time now. chromosomes show what syllables never admit.

the United Nations has only Intellectually existed about 80 years. That is my generation's age limits. It can be undone in less than a year. 8 billion sole displacements just have to change their mind.

It is a simple decision away from actuality.

Yes, it can be undone ....
The problem is the longer this great reset is kept in moton the odds of it becoming undone go down exponentially. ...
 

Majik » 08 Nov 2023, 12:13 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Nov 2023, 12:13 pm

Yes, it can be undone ....
The problem is the longer this great reset is kept in moton the odds of it becoming undone go down exponentially. ...
 

What reset? Nothing stays the same unique combination by periodic elements or chromosomes as arrived while adapting to time occupying space here.

You refuse to use your brain as conceived to do what every ancestor did prior to your chromosome makeup replacing every ancestor in your DNA chain since inception of this species native to this atmosphere.

sootedupCyndi » 07 Nov 2023, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Nov 2023, 1:27 pm

Why them Mr.Kelly? They are a big part of the problem? consider it all of them!
look at the loon  Robert de Niro?
Railed against Trump- like a nut case!!!
Then one of his family members died of a fentanyl pill.!!!
From  Bidens  open borders.. for his Votes! what a loon if you ask me!
It really is time to stop defending liberal policies--- and STOP the insanity!!

They get paid handsomely for their Hypocrisy .....
and most of them consider themselves as being a part of the global elite ....
we always must keep this in mind ....
 

Nostradamus'omh » 08 Nov 2023, 12:17 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Nov 2023, 12:17 pm

What reset? Nothing stays the same unique combination by periodic elements or chromosomes as arrived while adapting to time occupying space here.

You refuse to use your brain as conceived to do what every ancestor did prior to your chromosome makeup replacing every ancestor in your DNA chain since inception of this species native to this atmosphere.

OMH!!! it's economic warfare!
 

Majik » 08 Nov 2023, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

08 Nov 2023, 11:13 am

So, when will Unilever let the U.N. know that it is breaking their SDG global platform agreements ....huh?
Just because they are not going to promote a "Woke" lifestyle anymore because of it's unpopularity does not mean they will break their legally binding SDG agreements with the U.N. 
All of these Corporations are heavily invested now in this U.N. Global Corporate SDG platform and are playing the long game .....
Unilever is just going to change their public image while still maintain​i​​ng their SDG legal obligations ...
It's no different than Anheuser-Busch InBev ....

They already HAVE, *******!! That was the entire point of the call to ALL of their partners. The UN isn't in any real hurry to tell people since that proves the FAILURE of their entire purpose.

Beekeeper » 08 Nov 2023, 12:27 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Nov 2023, 12:27 pm

They already HAVE, *******!! That was the entire point of the call to ALL of their partners. The UN isn't in any real hurry to tell people since that proves the FAILURE of their entire purpose.

NO, They haven't .....they are going to accelerate equity and sustainability .....
which contradicts you and your opinion......OOPS....

Unilever CEO signals radical shift in sustainability agendaRadical focus Under Schumacher’s vision, sustainability will become part of a composite score by which Unilever will evaluate performance. Schumacher highlighted Unilever’s biotechnology innovation and ecodesign efforts, which he said have reduced the emissions footprint of specific products. "We’ll continue to convert our strong know-how in this area into products that mitigate or, even better, eliminate environmental impact," he said. Details of how sustainability will be embedded in key performance indicators were not disclosed, but Schumacher said an updated climate transition action plan will be presented at Unilever’s next annual meeting. It will involve "radically focusing" the sustainability agenda and include "timebound actions for each of our business groups to help reduce our footprint on our journey to net zero," he said. Unilever will reframe sustainability around four pillars — climate, nature, plastics and livelihoods — while giving division heads and brand managers authority to set metrics for tracking progress. Ultimately, sustainability must have "material impact" for Unilever and for the environment and societies it serves, the CEO said. "We will do that not by setting a lot of aspirational goals that are so long term that none of us will be around to be held to account for them but instead by short-terming our work that is by making real, steady, meaningful progress on the big issues quarter on quarter, year on year," Schumacher said. "Time-bound, costed roadmaps will ensure we stay on track and we will hold ourselves accountable to targets that are explicit, stretching, transparent and measurable."Unilever still intends to submit updated targets to the Science Based Targets initiative in 2023 for validation, a spokesperson said. Unilever’s pivot is a "commendable step forward" that recognizes the need for corporations to accelerate action, said Ion Visinovschi, research analyst with think tank Planet Tracker. "Brand relevance and product superiority are vital attributes in driving both environmental responsibility and market growth," he said. "I don’t see this as part of the anti-woke pushback, remotely, but a reflection of the reality that as sustainability imperatives mainstream, the shotgun approach to commitments risks attacks for greenwashing and lowered overall impact," said long-time sustainability strategist John Elkington, who consults with Unilever.Equity analysts were less optimistic about the reboot. A research note by HSBC’s consumer category research team described the plan as similar to Polman’s agenda back in 2012. "Despite Hein Schumacher’s convincing delivery, we think that investors will want to see a lot more evidence before giving the group the benefit of the doubt," they said.

https://www.greenbiz.com/article/unilev ... ity-agenda

 
 

Majik » 08 Nov 2023, 1:59 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Nov 2023, 1:59 pm

NO, They haven't .....they are going to accelerate equity and sustainability .....
which contradicts you and your opinion......OOPS....

Unilever CEO signals radical shift in sustainability agendaRadical focus Under Schumacher’s vision, sustainability will become part of a composite score by which Unilever will evaluate performance. Schumacher highlighted Unilever’s biotechnology innovation and ecodesign efforts, which he said have reduced the emissions footprint of specific products. "We’ll continue to convert our strong know-how in this area into products that mitigate or, even better, eliminate environmental impact," he said. Details of how sustainability will be embedded in key performance indicators were not disclosed, but Schumacher said an updated climate transition action plan will be presented at Unilever’s next annual meeting. It will involve "radically focusing" the sustainability agenda and include "timebound actions for each of our business groups to help reduce our footprint on our journey to net zero," he said. Unilever will reframe sustainability around four pillars — climate, nature, plastics and livelihoods — while giving division heads and brand managers authority to set metrics for tracking progress. Ultimately, sustainability must have "material impact" for Unilever and for the environment and societies it serves, the CEO said. "We will do that not by setting a lot of aspirational goals that are so long term that none of us will be around to be held to account for them but instead by short-terming our work that is by making real, steady, meaningful progress on the big issues quarter on quarter, year on year," Schumacher said. "Time-bound, costed roadmaps will ensure we stay on track and we will hold ourselves accountable to targets that are explicit, stretching, transparent and measurable."Unilever still intends to submit updated targets to the Science Based Targets initiative in 2023 for validation, a spokesperson said. Unilever’s pivot is a "commendable step forward" that recognizes the need for corporations to accelerate action, said Ion Visinovschi, research analyst with think tank Planet Tracker. "Brand relevance and product superiority are vital attributes in driving both environmental responsibility and market growth," he said. "I don’t see this as part of the anti-woke pushback, remotely, but a reflection of the reality that as sustainability imperatives mainstream, the shotgun approach to commitments risks attacks for greenwashing and lowered overall impact," said long-time sustainability strategist John Elkington, who consults with Unilever.Equity analysts were less optimistic about the reboot. A research note by HSBC’s consumer category research team described the plan as similar to Polman’s agenda back in 2012. "Despite Hein Schumacher’s convincing delivery, we think that investors will want to see a lot more evidence before giving the group the benefit of the doubt," they said.

You should READ the **** you post, ******* before you actually use it to attempt to validate your points....

"Brand relevance and product superiority are vital attributes in driving both environmental responsibility and market growth," he said. "I don’t see this as part of the anti-woke pushback, remotely, but a reflection of the reality that as sustainability imperatives mainstream, the shotgun approach to commitments risks attacks for greenwashing and lowered overall impact,"

Damn, can you READ AND COMPREHEND what he just said?? It means that BRAND AND PRODUCT are the most important thing, and isn't playing the WOKE ****!!

!!
 
 

sooted up Cyndi » 08 Nov 2023, 12:25 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Nov 2023, 12:25 pm

OMH!!! it's economic warfare!
 

Economics is psychological class warfare on a subliminal level(intellectual mind) training brains to reject their own sense of proportion. It is the perfect symbolism over substance methodology that hasn't failed in 350 generation gaps.

I escaped instinctively not supernaturally imagining anything else is possible than genetics compounding chromosomes into thermodynamic results of perpetual motion sustaining the movements of genetic cycles combined to current population defending ideas life is too complicated to navigate space individually here. living one at a time now.

tht is the purpose of reasonable doubt and undeniable facts recited every generation character counts and genders are sacrificial hosts to divine intellectual beings a gift from a higher form of evolving nobody can see and never had a body of its own. God, Satan, devil in the details, buyer beware.

Beekeeper » 08 Nov 2023, 3:02 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Nov 2023, 3:02 pm

You should READ the **** you post, ******* before you actually use it to attempt to validate your points....

"Brand relevance and product superiority are vital attributes in driving both environmental responsibility and market growth," he said. "I don’t see this as part of the anti-woke pushback, remotely, but a reflection of the reality that as sustainability imperatives mainstream, the shotgun approach to commitments risks attacks for greenwashing and lowered overall impact,"

Damn, can you READ AND COMPREHEND what he just said?? It means that BRAND AND PRODUCT are the most important thing, and isn't playing the WOKE ****!!

!!

It will involve "radically focusing" the sustainability agenda and include "timebound actions for each of our business groups to help reduce our footprint on our journey to net zero," he said. Unilever will reframe sustainability around four pillars — climate, nature, plastics and livelihoods — while giving division heads and brand managers authority to set metrics for tracking progress. Ultimately, sustainability must have "material impact" 

Funny how he contradicts your belief .....

 

Majik » 08 Nov 2023, 4:07 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Nov 2023, 4:07 pm

It will involve "radically focusing" the sustainability agenda and include "timebound actions for each of our business groups to help reduce our footprint on our journey to net zero," he said. Unilever will reframe sustainability around four pillars — climate, nature, plastics and livelihoods — while giving division heads and brand managers authority to set metrics for tracking progress. Ultimately, sustainability must have "material impact" 

Funny how he contradicts your belief .....

 

Genetics 4 pillars of compounding DNA arriving into last ancestors born
Pillar #1 16 great great grandparents
#2 8 great grandparents
#3 4 grandparents
#4 2 parenting the replacements of previous 4 generations since siblings that didn't become biological parents or outlived their children and grandchildren don't have offspring in the 5 and beyond generation gaps not conceived yet.
#5 each great great grandchild the total sum combined chromosomes off their previous generation gaps since inception. Universal binary code in motion of never conceived didn't exist and 1 existing never duplicated in form or shape twice conceived to decomposed.

every race, creed, color, national origin, gender, ideology assumed after birth is part of this Continuing Resolution of Natural time displaced in plain sight.

Nothing majikal about evolving as displaced.

Mrkelly » 07 Nov 2023, 12:30 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Nov 2023, 12:30 pm

I have tried to find a good source for info of celebrities that belong and participated in the WEF

I have heard of many

but I would like to find a list like the one above for celebrities

How about our politicians on both sides of the isle?

Str8tEdge » 08 Nov 2023, 5:41 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Nov 2023, 5:41 pm

How about our politicians on both sides of the isle?

them too

Majik » 08 Nov 2023, 4:07 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Nov 2023, 4:07 pm

It will involve "radically focusing" the sustainability agenda and include "timebound actions for each of our business groups to help reduce our footprint on our journey to net zero," he said. Unilever will reframe sustainability around four pillars — climate, nature, plastics and livelihoods — while giving division heads and brand managers authority to set metrics for tracking progress. Ultimately, sustainability must have "material impact" 

Funny how he contradicts your belief .....

Gee, that;s funny. Today, he announced to ALL the partners that Unilever would be doing a 100% RESET of their entire product line and marketing!! And it's ALL about product and FAR LESS about the **** of "sustainability" and "social justice"!!

Sucks for you, huh??

Mrkelly » 08 Nov 2023, 5:42 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Nov 2023, 5:42 pm

them too

Politicians are a lot more influential in our day to day activities.

Str8tEdge » 08 Nov 2023, 5:41 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Nov 2023, 5:41 pm

How about our politicians on both sides of the isle?

how do two sides work 6 degrees of separation simultaneously taking place? Dishonesty and corrupt. dictatorship or democracy directing outcomes for the other 4 degrees of separated ancestry here now?

Beekeeper » 08 Nov 2023, 5:52 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Nov 2023, 5:52 pm

Gee, that;s funny. Today, he announced to ALL the partners that Unilever would be doing a 100% RESET of their entire product line and marketing!! And it's ALL about product and FAR LESS about the **** of "sustainability" and "social justice"!!

Sucks for you, huh??

Yep, they are streamlining for a more sustainable and equitable future ....
And I suggest that before you keep digging a bigger hole for youself that you look at who some of their biggest investors are ......
BlackRock, Vangaurd,  State Street, and Wellington management group.(The Biggest stakeholder capitalist's in the world and the richest)
Oh and by the way ....what created this restructuring was activist investor Nelson Peltz who bought a stake and is formerly of Disney , P and G and Pepsico.
So, while you claim that Unilever has divested from stakeholder "Woke" capitalism ......it simply isn't true ....





 

Str8tEdge » 08 Nov 2023, 5:56 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Nov 2023, 5:56 pm

Politicians are a lot more influential in our day to day activities.

not too sure about that 

Average people pay more attention to Hollywood and TV celebrities than politicians 

Mrkelly » 09 Nov 2023, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑

09 Nov 2023, 10:15 am

not too sure about that 

Average people pay more attention to Hollywood and TV celebrities than politicians

Good point. Sad, but good point.