Liberal Forum

Str8tEdge » 09 Nov 2023, 1:05 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Nov 2023, 1:05 pm

Good point. Sad, but good point.

means, motives, methods, people choose the selections they take as truth of two sided narratives?

6 degrees of separating ancestors from understanding their specific ancestral time adapting as displaced come from morality, legality, ethics, economics, social consensus, laws directing outcomes forward from each generation incoming evolving here now controlling what people believe cradle to grave inception to extinction.

I understand where eternal life happens from the point genetics compounding chromosomes of lifetimes present never duplicated form or shape since arriving a fertilized cell the collection of two ancestors reproducing a replacement forward each child each parent is part of added or outlived without becoming a grandparent.

Oh the compounding simplicity of 0 or 1.

Majik » 09 Nov 2023, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑

09 Nov 2023, 10:00 am

Yep, they are streamlining for a more sustainable and equitable future ....
And I suggest that before you keep digging a bigger hole for youself that you look at who some of their biggest investors are ......
BlackRock, Vangaurd,  State Street, and Wellington management group.(The Biggest stakeholder capitalist's in the world and the richest)
Oh and by the way ....what created this restructuring was activist investor Nelson Peltz who bought a stake and is formerly of Disney , P and G and Pepsico.
So, while you claim that Unilever has divested from stakeholder "Woke" capitalism ......it simply isn't true ....

*******, you fail again!!

What you are seeing is from the OUTSIDE. What I am seeing is coming DIRECTLY FROM THE INSIDE!! A total "reset" of Unilever is in the works and if you think for one second they are going to make that public until it happens, you are a **** idiot.

Beekeeper » 10 Nov 2023, 7:51 am » wrote: ↑

10 Nov 2023, 7:51 am

*******, you fail again!!

What you are seeing is from the OUTSIDE. What I am seeing is coming DIRECTLY FROM THE INSIDE!! A total "reset" of Unilever is in the works and if you think for one second they are going to make that public until it happens, you are a **** idiot.

Try looking at evolution from actual evolving keeping you eternally separated while spontaneously alive simultaneously here within a population never same person added twice between inception and extinction.

Imagine every conceived ancestor of any species is being eternally separated now. the entire food chain native to this atmosphere where the source is compounding combinations between erosion and decomposing results stay in this atmosphere isolated universally here unique to everything out there.

Eternity is physically here and your one time event occupying space has direct limitations as anything else occupying time now. Is that not the God element.
Is not reasonable doubt the Great Satan corrupting each ancestor added to a species pretending the world is but a stage to direct outcomes tomorrow only arriving as currently taking place 24/7 logistical statistically averaged facts used against last generation by previous 5 in rule of law.

Devil in details. Everyone does it, anyone that doesn't gets eliminated.

Majik » 08 Nov 2023, 4:07 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Nov 2023, 4:07 pm

It will involve "radically focusing" the sustainability agenda and include "timebound actions for each of our business groups to help reduce our footprint on our journey to net zero," he said. Unilever will reframe sustainability around four pillars — climate, nature, plastics and livelihoods — while giving division heads and brand managers authority to set metrics for tracking progress. Ultimately, sustainability must have "material impact" 

Funny how he contradicts your belief .....

Sustainability and reducing pollution are not woke policies. I like eating endangered species as much as the next guy, but that doesn't mean I want to see elephant tacos at taco bell. Micro plastics are an issue, pollution is an issue, sustainability is certainly a valid consideration. I believe conservatives need to take environmentalism back from the left, who seem to waste all their time and attention on global warming. You don't need to be woke to want to be responsible stewards of the planet. 
 

Neo » 10 Nov 2023, 8:46 am » wrote: ↑

10 Nov 2023, 8:46 am

Sustainability and reducing pollution are not woke policies. I like eating endangered species as much as the next guy, but that doesn't mean I want to see elephant tacos at taco bell. Micro plastics are an issue, pollution is an issue, sustainability is certainly a valid consideration. I believe conservatives need to take environmentalism back from the left, who seem to waste all their time and attention on global warming. You don't need to be woke to want to be responsible stewards of the planet. 
 

Not instinctive either. They are contextual ideas between brains pretending life isn't self evident evolving here one at a time.

Beekeeper » 10 Nov 2023, 7:51 am » wrote: ↑

10 Nov 2023, 7:51 am

*******, you fail again!!

What you are seeing is from the OUTSIDE. What I am seeing is coming DIRECTLY FROM THE INSIDE!! A total "reset" of Unilever is in the works and if you think for one second they are going to make that public until it happens, you are a **** idiot.

They can reset it all they want .....
what they are actually doing is restructuring  to meet future demands ....
Your belief that they are turning their backs on being a global leader in stakeholder capitalism and ESG is hilarious. ....
case in point .....

Unilever Creators Study, August and September 2023

RETAIL

New research, carried out between August and September 2023 for Unilever, unveils a growing appetite and interest amongst creators in posting more sustainability content. However, creators need help to build their confidence and knowledge of the intertwined ESG space.

https://www.ipsos.com/en-uk/unilever-cr ... ember-2023

 
 

Neo » 10 Nov 2023, 8:46 am » wrote: ↑

10 Nov 2023, 8:46 am

Sustainability and reducing pollution are not woke policies. I like eating endangered species as much as the next guy, but that doesn't mean I want to see elephant tacos at taco bell. Micro plastics are an issue, pollution is an issue, sustainability is certainly a valid consideration. I believe conservatives need to take environmentalism back from the left, who seem to waste all their time and attention on global warming. You don't need to be woke to want to be responsible stewards of the planet.

Being a global leader in the WEF's stakeholder capitalism and ESG kind of destroys your argument....

 

Majik » 10 Nov 2023, 12:07 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Nov 2023, 12:07 pm

They can reset it all they want .....
what they are actually doing is restructuring  to meet future demands ....
Your belief that they are turning their backs on being a global leader in stakeholder capitalism and ESG is hilarious. ....
case in point .....

Unilever Creators Study, August and September 2023

RETAIL

New research, carried out between August and September 2023 for Unilever, unveils a growing appetite and interest amongst creators in posting more sustainability content. However, creators need help to build their confidence and knowledge of the intertwined ESG space.

https://www.ipsos.com/en-uk/unilever-cr ... ember-2023

You MIGHT should actually READ the entire article. It has EVERYTHING to do with "content creators" on SOCIAL MEDIA and nothing about the direction Unilever or OTHER corporations are taking. ONLY how to appease the LWNJ idiots on social media.

So you once again, fall in that pile of **** you have been creating by posting IRRELEVANT **** to the FACT that UNILEVER IS MOVING AWAY FROM APPEASING EVERY SWINGING DICK AND **** ON THE PLANET!!

sootedupCyndi » 07 Nov 2023, 1:39 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Nov 2023, 1:39 pm

They won't! I hadn't heard of that?
What is wrong with them????
It's really sad to me- that politics clouds their minds to this extent?
kids are dying? but they won't stop... i suppose saving face is more important...
votes are more important then reality!

 @sooted up Cyndi  

 

Beekeeper » 10 Nov 2023, 12:15 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Nov 2023, 12:15 pm

You MIGHT should actually READ the entire article. It has EVERYTHING to do with "content creators" on SOCIAL MEDIA and nothing about the direction Unilever or OTHER corporations are taking. ONLY how to appease the LWNJ idiots on social media.

So you once again, fall in that pile of **** you have been creating by posting IRRELEVANT **** to the FACT that UNILEVER IS MOVING AWAY FROM APPEASING EVERY SWINGING DICK AND **** ON THE PLANET!!

You are the one who has created a pile of **** .....
you claimed Unilever is turning their backs on stakeholder capitalism and ESG ........and have offered no **** proof to back up your claim while I have provided example after example that contradict's your claim.....
Here is two more right from their own website....






The Unilever Compass is our strategy to deliver growth that is consistent, competitive, profitable and responsible.Our business simply will not prosper without a healthy planet and society.We’ve set out an ambitious sustainability agenda to tackle the issues that our consumers and stakeholders care deeply about – such as climate change, plastic pollution and inequality.We’re harnessing our brands, our people and our partners to create lasting positive impact – on the world and our business.Find out more about our progress so far.

https://www.unilever.ca/planet-and-society/

 Climate actionClimate change is now a climate crisis. We’re taking action across our business and value chain. And our brands are on the front line with game-changing product innovations.We’re urging others to join us to accelerate the transition to a net zero economy. There's no time to waste.

https://www.unilever.com/planet-and-soc ... te-action/

 

Majik » 10 Nov 2023, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Nov 2023, 12:10 pm

Being a global leader in the WEF's stakeholder capitalism and ESG kind of destroys your argument....

Not really. I don't believe surrendering environmental concerns to the left is a wise play. They are grossly mismanaging these issues and using funds from climate change fears as a slush fund to finance less savory items on their agenda.  Conservatives would be remiss to abandon this to progressives. 
 

 Neo
Not really. I don't believe surrendering environmental concerns to the left is a wise play. They are grossly mismanaging these issues and using funds from climate change fears as a slush fund to finance less savory items on their agenda.  Conservatives would be remiss to abandon this to progressives.

I am not saying we should abandon environmental stewardship to the progressives ....
Stakeholder capitalism and ESG is the engine  driving the progressive leftist agenda and Unilever is highly engaged in that endeavor. ....

 

Majik » 10 Nov 2023, 1:13 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Nov 2023, 1:13 pm

You are the one who has created a pile of **** .....
you claimed Unilever is turning their backs on stakeholder capitalism and ESG ........and have offered no **** proof to back up your claim while I have provided example after example that contradict's your claim.....
Here is two more right from their own website....

The Unilever Compass is our strategy to deliver growth that is consistent, competitive, profitable and responsible.Our business simply will not prosper without a healthy planet and society.We’ve set out an ambitious sustainability agenda to tackle the issues that our consumers and stakeholders care deeply about – such as climate change, plastic pollution and inequality.We’re harnessing our brands, our people and our partners to create lasting positive impact – on the world and our business.Find out more about our progress so far.

https://www.unilever.ca/planet-and-society/

 Climate actionClimate change is now a climate crisis. We’re taking action across our business and value chain. And our brands are on the front line with game-changing product innovations.We’re urging others to join us to accelerate the transition to a net zero economy. There's no time to waste.

https://www.unilever.com/planet-and-soc ... te-action/
 

I NEVER once said a damn thing you are claiming. QUITE THE OPPOSITE in that they are STOPPING THE WOKE CRAP AND INSTEAD MOVING TO MORE PROFITABLE CAPITALIST CORPORATE GOVERNANCE!! MOST of the crap on their website is from the OLD regime and new pages will be forthcoming!!

GO **** YOURSELF and STOP YOUR ****!!

Beekeeper » 10 Nov 2023, 2:12 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Nov 2023, 2:12 pm

I NEVER once said a damn thing you are claiming. QUITE THE OPPOSITE in that they are STOPPING THE WOKE CRAP AND INSTEAD MOVING TO MORE PROFITABLE CAPITALIST CORPORATE GOVERNANCE!! MOST of the crap on their website is from the OLD regime and new pages will be forthcoming!!

GO **** YOURSELF and STOP YOUR ****!!

Is Unilever engaged in stake holder capitalism ?
Yes or No ?

 

Majik » 10 Nov 2023, 4:47 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Nov 2023, 4:47 pm

Is Unilever engaged in stake holder capitalism ?
Yes or No ?

I never said they weren't. What they are MOVING AWAY FROM is the "woke capitalism" that serves MORONS LIKE YOU, ****!! Ones that are too **** STOOPID to realize that the Bud Lights of this world are living a DOOMED EXISTENCE and Unilever isn't going down that path and moving AWAY FROM "woke capitalism"!!

Now, GO POUND SAND AND SHUT THE **** UP!!

Beekeeper » 11 Nov 2023, 7:21 am » wrote: ↑

11 Nov 2023, 7:21 am

I never said they weren't. What they are MOVING AWAY FROM is the "woke capitalism" that serves MORONS LIKE YOU, ****!! Ones that are too **** STOOPID to realize that the Bud Lights of this world are living a DOOMED EXISTENCE and Unilever isn't going down that path and moving AWAY FROM "woke capitalism"!!

Now, GO POUND SAND AND SHUT THE **** UP!!

"Woke capitalism", "woke capital" and "stakeholder capitalism" are terms used by some commentators to refer to a form of marketing, advertising and corporate structures that pertains to sociopolitical standpoints tied to social justice and activist causes.

All of unilever's stakeholders from BlackRock to Vangaurd to State street etc.....are "woke" capitalist's whom combined own a majority stake in unilever ...oops.
who push ESG and stakeholder capitalism .....
And as a Conservative I know who my enemies are ......you on the other hand are obviously an easy manipulated fool and don't...
Like I said before ...
Unilever may try and change their public perceptions but ultimately they are a "Woke" Capitalist corporation pushing stakeholder capitalism and ESG in every country they do business in ...
You can't be a member of the WEF if you don't.
Do some research for Christ sake .....
you are embarrassing Conservatives and yourself ...








​​​​​​
 

Majik » 11 Nov 2023, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑

11 Nov 2023, 8:40 am

"Woke capitalism", "woke capital" and "stakeholder capitalism" are terms used by some commentators to refer to a form of marketing, advertising and corporate structures that pertains to sociopolitical standpoints tied to social justice and activist causes.

All of unilever's stakeholders from BlackRock to Vangaurd to State street etc.....are "woke" capitalist's whom combined own a majority stake in unilever ...oops.
who push ESG and stakeholder capitalism .....
And as a Conservative I know who my enemies are ......you on the other hand are obviously an easy manipulated fool and don't...
Like I said before ...
Unilever may try and change their public perceptions but ultimately they are a "Woke" Capitalist corporation pushing stakeholder capitalism and ESG in every country they do business in ...
You can't be a member of the WEF if you don't.
Do some research for Christ sake .....
you are embarrassing Conservatives and yourself ...

Might I suggest in the arena of ideas the power of suggestion isn't the energy evolving things into results never duplicated twice. With that said, never debate capitalism with capitalizing off reasonable doubt when people compare details never duplicated any lifetime twice with saving humanity governing people the same way every generation gap added one at a time never same population becoming last generation here.

Majik » 11 Nov 2023, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑

11 Nov 2023, 8:40 am

"Woke capitalism", "woke capital" and "stakeholder capitalism" are terms used by some commentators to refer to a form of marketing, advertising and corporate structures that pertains to sociopolitical standpoints tied to social justice and activist causes.

All of unilever's stakeholders from BlackRock to Vangaurd to State street etc.....are "woke" capitalist's whom combined own a majority stake in unilever ...oops.
who push ESG and stakeholder capitalism .....
And as a Conservative I know who my enemies are ......you on the other hand are obviously an easy manipulated fool and don't...
Like I said before ...
Unilever may try and change their public perceptions but ultimately they are a "Woke" Capitalist corporation pushing stakeholder capitalism and ESG in every country they do business in ...
You can't be a member of the WEF if you don't.
Do some research for Christ sake .....
you are embarrassing Conservatives and yourself ...

​​​​​​

Yer an IDIOT!! And you have what INSIDE INFORMATION other than what your conspiracy theorists have pumped up your so called "conservative" ***??

 

Beekeeper » 11 Nov 2023, 8:58 am » wrote: ↑

11 Nov 2023, 8:58 am

Yer an IDIOT!! And you have what INSIDE INFORMATION other than what your conspiracy theorists have pumped up your so called "conservative" ***??

 

What are alternate realities in evolving results? Intellectually type cast people within same species separated by ancestral lineages all participating in ideas now isn't eternity and genetics doesn't eternally separate each reproduction added into the atmosphere so far.

Please debunk it using DNA and separate chromosomes per reproduction.