Liberal Forum

Southern Adolf » 30 Nov 2023, 5:51 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2023, 5:51 pm

Peanut gallery?
 

That is something one has to purchase with their greenies given by others, per thread added.

But marxism is to economics as Darwinism is to evolution theory covering up how evolving actually works within compounding chromosomes arriving after conception adapting in space at the same time here now.

Nostradamus'omh » 30 Nov 2023, 5:56 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2023, 5:56 pm

That is something one has to purchase with their greenies given by others, per thread added.

But marxism is to economics as Darwinism is to evolution theory covering up how evolving actually works within compounding chromosomes arriving after conception adapting in space at the same time here now.

So isn't peanut gallery a safe space?
 

Southern Adolf » 30 Nov 2023, 5:57 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2023, 5:57 pm

So isn't peanut gallery a safe space?
 

Is it? What exactly is one safe from when paying for the peanut gallery? Getting their ancestral ideology debunked.

Nostradamus'omh » 30 Nov 2023, 6:00 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2023, 6:00 pm

Is it? What exactly is one safe from when paying for the peanut gallery? Getting their ancestral ideology debunked.

Other comments?
 
 

Southern Adolf » 30 Nov 2023, 6:02 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2023, 6:02 pm

Other comments?
 
 

then get a diary and leave everyone else out of your self deception and stop posting on a social media platform message board.

Nostradamus'omh » 30 Nov 2023, 6:04 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2023, 6:04 pm

then get a diary and leave everyone else out of your self deception and stop posting on a social media platform message board.

Why is peanut gallery here?

Southern Adolf » 30 Nov 2023, 6:05 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2023, 6:05 pm

Why is peanut gallery here?

So individuals can feel like a god or God's chosen banning others from their threads.". It's all mind over matter behavior by people that won't accept life in real time personally limited to adapting in the moment here as "equally reproduced one at a time.".

SouthernAdolf » 07 Nov 2023, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Nov 2023, 3:25 pm

TLDR

In other words, communism failed because people like stuff. No one wanted to stand in line all day for a potato.

Gramsci knew that economic Marxism was doomed to fail. That is why he suggested Marxism be back-doored into society. You start by infiltrating institutions, such as education, media, sports, and business.

This is what is happening in the U.S. today. Witness sexual freaks in schools, tv, sports, and beer commercials. Witness the destruction of statues and other erasures of history. Witness persecution of churches during Corona—the same churches that were at the fore of society in such chaotic times.

Yeah, good OP. I'd have nominated it, if it hadn't been a cut and paste. It was a great read.

Marxism was summed up by one of the experts on Marxism - a guy named Marx - in this way: From each according to his ability; to each according to his need.

And therein lay the failure of Marxism.

1. The creed makes need a rewardable virtue - which by the transitive power of happy horse **** makes competence a punishable vice. 
2. People are able to produce more than their needs. They can produce their wants - and people tend to want, as well as need. Unchievable wants = unhappy people.
3. In a world where the horde gets only what it needs, while producing to the margins of its ability, there will be spoils. And where there are spoils, there is cause for war. 
 
 
 

SouthernAdolf » 30 Nov 2023, 5:32 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2023, 5:32 pm

Is there a serious sub-forum where trolls are banned?

Yes. PG threads. You pay for PG, you are a senior mod in your thread. You can disappear posts. You can ban posters. It is a one-of-a-kind feature on the interwebs, the little people having that kind of power. Very proud of it.
 

supposedly college professors are die-hard liberals who love their Marxism. Well.. when I was in undergrad majoring in Economics.. took a course named "History of Economics". We spent about 4 weeks on Marx and the professor (A turkish woman) ripped Marx's theory to shreds. We read Das kapital from cover to cover (painful read, I might add) and with no exceptions, the class came to roughly the same conclusions as the professor.

Nostradamus'omh » 30 Nov 2023, 6:07 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2023, 6:07 pm

So individuals can feel like a god or God's chosen banning others from their threads.". It's all mind over matter behavior by people that won't accept life in real time personally limited to adapting in the moment here as "equally reproduced one at a time.".

So a safe space?

Cannonpointer » 30 Nov 2023, 6:13 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2023, 6:13 pm

Yeah, good OP. I'd have nominated it, if it hadn't been a cut and paste. It was a great read.

Marxism was summed up by one of the experts on Marxism - a guy named Marx - in this way: From each according to his ability; to each according to his need.

And therein lay the failure of Marxism.

1. The creed makes need a rewardable virtue - which by the transitive power of happy horse **** makes competence a punishable vice. 
2. People are able to produce more than their needs. They can produce their wants - and people tend to want, as well as need. Unchievable wants = unhappy people.
3. In a world where the horde gets only what it needs, while producing to the margins of its ability, there will be spoils. And where there are spoils, there is cause for war.

Glad you read it.  Many people just skip.

I like to do summaries, but don't want to make it mundane.  Even more mundane is the visual, but those are eye grabbing.

I like your three points.  

And I neglected to post the source.  I will find it.

Cannonpointer » 30 Nov 2023, 6:13 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2023, 6:13 pm

Yeah, good OP. I'd have nominated it, if it hadn't been a cut and paste. It was a great read.

Marxism was summed up by one of the experts on Marxism - a guy named Marx - in this way: From each according to his ability; to each according to his need.

And therein lay the failure of Marxism.

1. The creed makes need a rewardable virtue - which by the transitive power of happy horse **** makes competence a punishable vice. 
2. People are able to produce more than their needs. They can produce their wants - and people tend to want, as well as need. Unchievable wants = unhappy people.
3. In a world where the horde gets only what it needs, while producing to the margins of its ability, there will be spoils. And where there are spoils, there is cause for war.

Human nature itself explains why Marxism will never work.

Why break your back pulling the cart, when you can ride for free?

People will always defer to the easiest path when it's an unrestricted option.

 It's not rocket science.
 

RedheadedStranger » 30 Nov 2023, 7:15 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2023, 7:15 pm

Human nature itself explains why Marxism will never work.

Why break your back pulling the cart, when you can ride for free?

People will always defer to the easiest path when it's an unrestricted option.

 It's not rocket science.

Having read Das Kaptial and have a Phd in Economics.. I came to mostly the same conclusion. 

RedheadedStranger » 30 Nov 2023, 7:15 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2023, 7:15 pm

Human nature itself explains why Marxism will never work.

Why break your back pulling the cart, when you can ride for free?

People will always defer to the easiest path when it's an unrestricted option.

 It's not rocket science.

I tell managers that the recipe for excellence is right in front of their eyes.

People take the path of least resistance. Make excellence the path of least resistance, and your will be surrounded by it. 

But there is an ENORMOUS problem that arises, as soon as most people try to make excellence the path of least resistance for others. They almost always fail to make it so for themselves. 

I have always run tight shows, because I have always constituted myself as the embodiment of what I preach. I do not only demand excellence of others. I demand it of myself. In my careers, I developed the art of having my boss's head on my shoulder every minute of the work day. I never once decided a purchase, for example, on whether I could explain it. I spent money based on whether I knew for sure my boss would spend that money, were he in my place. As a result, I never found myself explaining purchases. I never once worked for a company that the boss did not compliment me on my budgetary compliance. I actually had one boss call me up and ask me whether I knew my office had an expense account. The guys before me had been profligate - I was just working with inherited everything.

If you would get your people to put your eyes in their heads, you must first put YOUR boss's eyes in your head. 

It is the rare person who will play for excellence just because it's a game worth playing. The rest need a culture that punishes mediocrity. 
 

Southern Adolf » 30 Nov 2023, 7:01 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2023, 7:01 pm

So a safe space?

Here are some rhetorical questions every human must answer instinctively in their own brain, not from a social mantra.
Safe from what harm?
Freedom from what dangers?
How does life actually physically evolve one ancestor at a time spontaneously alive simultaneously here?
Why doesn't living ever reproduce the same lifetime twice?
Which what am I here now?
Where am I?
What I am doing here now?
When did I arrive and do I depart?
Whom decides who I am socially?

I haven't met a character saving humanity that will honestly answer these questions except myself. Not my own ancestry, not my own family, not my friends, not my "allies", not those made me their enemy for not pledging allegiance to their beliefs.

I doubt reasonable doubt advocates have my best interests in their heart, mind, body, or soul believing their intellect is superior to an individual's brain adapting in space mutually evolving forward one at a time in plain sight.

Economics has a rule of 72, and chromosomes has a pattern of compression ratios that fit specific numbers to generation gaps living in each species occupying time evolving forward here one ancestor at a time and I have figured the algorithm out as a universal constant past, current events whether I existed or not, and in real time evolving there never was a tomorrow to be had.

Just the time adapting to the moment here since conceived.

the whole is equal to the total sum of its ever changing numbers present, until not any more reproductions added again.

So when eternally separated conceived to decomposed, where are safe spaces limited to adapting as displaced in a body never same total sum results here now. Relative time logistics corrupts each ancestor alive, now.

What do you have to do to correct it? Change your mind. But when you do, human intellectual souls defining tomorrow by rule of law will punish your honesty there after one of 3 ways.

1. Insubordination against social consensus of what people believe true. Punishment shunning.
2. Treason against their form of reasonable doubt, exile or execution.
3. Blasphemy against any reality currently is a hate crime against ideology of any franchise of humanity defending human rights to pretend now isn't eternity. Punishment shunning, exile, executed for not complying to "We say so.".

think I covered everything going on within this species in this atmosphere today and tomorrow because the past is done and over with as corrupted as it is now within the population of homo sapien ancestral lineages present. I have accounted for every conceived and died ancestor since inception of this species in this post again.

SouthernAdolf » 30 Nov 2023, 4:52 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2023, 4:52 pm

This might be considered the dumbed down version, but summaries are still useful.  Here ya go @MackTheFinger

.
LONG LIVE ISRAEL AND ALL THE LITTLE JOOs AROUND THE WORLD...THAT CONTROL IT.
.
.
.  

SouthernAdolf » 07 Nov 2023, 3:24 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Nov 2023, 3:24 pm

What is Cultural Marxism?
 

Just some made-up ****. All Marxism is ****. Karl Marx was a drunk wife-beater who could hardly rub two nickles together.  He completely relied on his wife and her rich family to mooch off of. His wife feared him, because when he got drunk, he'd beat her.  His kids despised him.  He had no friends and was he as a complete pisstard immigrant with starving children who couldn't even speak any English when he moved to London.   Yet, his wife couldn't do without her slave, so they had a life-long indentured servant.