Nostradamus'omh » 15 Nov 2023, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑ But it is his given name on his birth certificate. Hell my family has a nickname for me not even on my legal name even though it is part of my family name.
Your tyranny is showing. William Jefferson Clinton is Bill Clinton not matter which name is used addressing him as a topic or person. I bet he answers to "Come over here, big boy.".
Do that and lemme know!
I am not a female groupie with a low self esteem trying to reach the big time or 15 seconds of fame. I know my equal value to occupying space as anything ever universally here, past, current events, future additions beyond self evidently here.
Nostradamus'omh » 15 Nov 2023, 5:23 pm » wrote: ↑ I am not a female groupie with a low self esteem trying to reach the big time.
Nobody knows who I am, doubt you ever heard of me beyond posting on this site. And your behavior shows I am equal to nothing of value in your mind. That doesn't bother me because I understand your mind outside in and how a brain functions inside out naturally and socially.
Oh, okay fruitcake. It's such a mystery who you are!
Not a mystery, it is protocol/privacy policy. Doesn't matter which Ancestor I AM OCCUPYING SPACE NOW SINCE ALL ANCESTORS ARE ALIVE IN SERIES PARALLEL TIME AS DISPLACED SINCE CONCEIVED IN SPECIFIC ORDER OF ARRIVAL.Lincoln Nebraska » 15 Nov 2023, 5:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh, okay fruitcake. It's such a mystery who you are!
Tampering by intelligence agencies, dipwad.Z09 » 15 Nov 2023, 6:11 am » wrote: ↑ If there was real evidence why was the jury out for an hour and found no one guilty?
Actually, I read the same book Stone read, fruitcake.Z09 » 15 Nov 2023, 6:14 am » wrote: ↑ Can you show us the results of the trial?
Cmon..
Show us .
You get your knowledge from an Oliver Stone movie .
Look at the real facts.
Tell us the results of the trial?
The bolded part rather mitigates against you.Z09 » 15 Nov 2023, 6:17 am » wrote: ↑ Verdict and juror reaction[edit]At the trial's conclusion — after the prosecution and the defense had presented their cases — the jury took 54 minutes on March 1, 1969, to find Clay Shaw not guilty.Attorney and author Mark Lane said that he interviewed several jurors after the trial. Although these interviews have never been published, Lane said that some of the jurors believed that Garrison had in fact proven to them that there really was a conspiracy to kill President Kennedy, but that Garrison had not adequately linked the conspiracy to Shaw or provided a motive.[54][55] Author and playwright James Kirkwood, who was a personal friend of Clay Shaw, said that he spoke to several jury members who denied ever speaking to Lane.[56] Kirkwood also cast doubt on Lane's claim that the jury believed there was a conspiracy.[57] In his book American Grotesque, Kirkwood said that jury foreman Sidney Hebert told him: "I didn't think too much of the Warren Report either until the trial. Now I think a lot more of it than I did before."[58]
Careful. The dick suckers and hors will call you a "conspiracy theorist."Hank » 16 Nov 2023, 9:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Oswald claimed to be a pasty until Ruby shot him down,
Ruby went into a state of psychosis after being visited by Louis Jolyon West.
Louis Jolyon West, "a CIA psychiatrist" who worked extensively on the mk ultra program. Why did West even visit Ruby ?
Everyone who knew Oswald, Ruby or West that chose to speak up in one way or another died shortly after speaking up.
Evidence presented by who ?Z09 » 13 Nov 2023, 5:56 am » wrote: ↑ No he wasn't...
You really think all these organizations got together and planned a murder?
They couldn't keep the planning stage a secret for 5 minutes.
Every bit of evidence points to Oswald who right after the shooting fled and tried to hide.
Evidence of an innocent man?
18 years earlier, they had kept the DDAY invasion a secret from the entire world - with state intelligence agencies spending fortunes to find them out.Z09 » 13 Nov 2023, 5:56 am » wrote: ↑ No he wasn't...
You really think all these organizations got together and planned a murder?
They couldn't keep the planning stage a secret for 5 minutes.
Every bit of evidence points to Oswald who right after the shooting fled and tried to hide.
Evidence of an innocent man?
Of course they were celebrating, they had plenty of reasons to want Kennedy dead...Z09 » 15 Nov 2023, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑ So Bush Sr, LBJ and Nixon all celebrated when JFK was shot...?
And you base this on what?

Every alternate reality supporting humanity has one common link to the different ways people believe eternity is beyond the moment here. Every relative time intellectual contextual fact defies the natural way evolving happens in plain sight.Cannonpointer » 16 Nov 2023, 9:27 pm » wrote: ↑ Careful. The dick suckers and hors will call you a "conspiracy theorist."
They seem to view that as a bad thing. It never occurs to them that they are mouthpieces for the same establishment that tells them boys are girls and the earth has too MUCH atmospheric carbon when in fact it is so critically short on that trace gas that most of our vegetables require a carbon enhanced environment just to produce.
Yawn... A jury of Louisiana coon asses did not convict someone...Z09 » 17 Nov 2023, 5:37 am » wrote: ↑ We've have hundreds of research and investigations by our government and independent researchers.
We've also had a trial that came back empty in New Orleans.
The man charged was found not guilty after 54 minutes of discussion.
Anyone can start an investigation anytime they want.
Who escalated the Vietnam war?Z09 » 17 Nov 2023, 5:42 am » wrote: ↑ There's on poster in this topic that claims Bush Sr, LBJ, and Nixon helped planned the assassination and was celebrating the night before...
How dumb is that?
The Nation magazine, in its current issue, quotes a memo of Nov. 29, 1963, from J. Edgar Hoover, the bureau's Director at the time, to the State Department about the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.In the memo, according to the magazine, Mr. Hoover stated that the bureau had briefed ''Mr. George Bush of the Central Intelligence Agency'' on the reaction of Cuban exiles in Miami to the assassination.
They knew neither when nor WHERE, trollop. In spite of trying. Do you have ANY IDEA how many people had to keep that secret? And for far more than "five minutes," you stupid ****-tooth. Your breath stinks of ignorance.Z09 » 17 Nov 2023, 5:28 am » wrote: ↑ First, the invasion was known but not when.
There were weather conditions and the date was change numerous times.
Keep sniveling, you gay *** hor - you ignorant misguided slut.Z09 » 17 Nov 2023, 5:28 am » wrote: ↑ Second, since you can't have a grown up debate without calling someone a whore, slut, *** or using the N word perhaps you should move on..
You obviously aren't mature enough to keep up
I never argued that numerous agencies did any such thing. I say the CIA did it and the other agencies stayed out of their way rather than fatally colliding, ya stupid trollop.Z09 » 17 Nov 2023, 5:28 am » wrote: ↑ And third...
You actually believe numerous agencies and people planned the murder of a president and have kept it quiet for 60 years?