Liberal Forum

Anyone else notice that embarrassed **** talks to me without tagging me, because she had her *** handed to her?

Z09 » 16 Jan 2024, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 8:32 am

Sorry Cannon..
The laws are very clear..
You can renounce your US citizenship and still come back to the US...
Just like Oswald did...

After renouncing US citizenship, your ability to enter the US will be like any other foreign national. You will need the appropriate visa for travel and staying in the US.Jun 21, 2023



https://www.quora.com/Can-you-renounce- ... -few-years

Yes the laws are very clear, they typecast ancestry all the time. Bigotry, biases, prejudices, superior, inferior, master, slave, mentalities all come from pretending genetics doesn't equally displace the lifetimes evolving as displaced by the moment here living has always been equally adapt or become extinct.

There is nothing fair about natural balancing time changing the population left alive now never same ancestors twice inception to extinction of a species and its ancestral lineages arriving one conception at a time until dead not same order of arrival as departing.

Z09 » 16 Jan 2024, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 9:06 am

I'm just arguing your points

People that denounced their US citizenship CAN come back in the US...
As long as they do it legally..

Name one.

Ten thousand people renounced their citizenship and were never allowed to return.

I can name one - oswald. The state department even paid for his ticket.

Okay, your turn.

Name another.

Z09 » 16 Jan 2024, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 9:06 am

And Hunt's "deathbed" confession was seriously questioned by his widow that claims her sons were saying that for financial gains

Yet it exists, mouth of the south.

You said it didn't.

The more you talk, the more you step in it.

You don't know ****, and you lack the quality of being teachable.

Z09 » 16 Jan 2024, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 9:06 am

Also, Oswald worked at the TSBD for 5 weeks...
And the parade route was announced a couple days before JFK arrived

After it was changed by the secret service, dummy.

Z09 » 16 Jan 2024, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 9:06 am

Are you saying saying someone called Oswald and told them to get hired at this place and then they changed the parade route so JFK would drive by?

I am saying he was put where he was put so that they could use him as a patsy. He was CLEARLY involved with american intelligence. NO ONE denies that connection. How could they? The man declared his citizenship null and void, and in the same declaration where he renounced his citizenship, he expressed his intention of telling the soviets everything he had learned through his service in the marines.

He was also being funded invisibly - such that he could make bail and hire workers with no obvious source of income. He was active with both nazis and communists - CLEARLY on behalf of american intelligence agencies.

Now, I dunno what value his information had to the soviets (likely very little), but in the 60s you didn't defect without becoming known to american intelligence agencies - and you sure as **** did not RETURN without their say-so,

So, give us that one name, huh. Just one. Other than Oswald. Go.
 

Sumela » 15 Jan 2024, 10:43 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Jan 2024, 10:43 pm

I remember we were promised

flying cars.

Lying MuggFuggas.

  You reminded me of one of my favs

https://youtu.be/r1SCu9yiBlo?si=HOMU6mXHNk--YxiY
 
 

Mrkelly » 16 Jan 2024, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 10:23 am

  You reminded me of one of my favs

https://youtu.be/r1SCu9yiBlo?si=HOMU6mXHNk--YxiY

Hells yes bro.  I remember that tune  
 

Cannonpointer » 16 Jan 2024, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 8:35 am

Anyone else notice that embarrassed **** talks to me without tagging me, because she had her *** handed to her?

that’s what the BUTWHATABOUT bitch does 

I thought this this was interesting 

you probably already saw it

https://thegrayzone.com/2023/11/22/jfk- ... -cia-plot/
 

Z09 » 16 Jan 2024, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 10:09 am

Is your argument that no one that denounced their citizenship were ever allowed back in the US again?

I've already showed you that the privilege exists.
Just as Oswald used the privilege.

I showed you quote that it does exist.

Simply because he's the most famous person that used the law doesn't mean others haven't or couldn't.

The privilege exists.
It's law.

So you cannot name one - and you're still running your cow hole without tagging me, hoping to avoid me seeing your ****. 

He renounced citizenship - and he is the only one ever to do so and be allowed back in.

His services were needed for patsy service, you loud mouthed, bring-nothing chump. 
 

Mrkelly » 16 Jan 2024, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 11:12 am

that’s what the BUTWHATABOUT bitch does 

I thought this this was interesting 

you probably already saw it

https://thegrayzone.com/2023/11/22/jfk- ... -cia-plot/

I had not - but thank you.

Now, if you will excuse me, I have a **** to attend to. Mille grazie.
 

Z09 » 16 Jan 2024, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 10:09 am

Is your argument

Just STFU. You said no death bed confession. I gave you one. You said no evidence - as if an indictment and trial did not verify that such existed. Here is some MORE, no top of that.

The House Select Committee on Assassinations says your full of ****, you stooge. They say there IS evidence of a conspiracy, no matter how much you moo. Here are their findings, you unruly trollop:

https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/s ... tee-report

I. Findings of the Select Committee on Assassination in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy

• I.A. Lee Harvey Oswald fired three shots at President John F. Kennedy. The second and third shots he fired struck the President. The third shot he fired killed the President
• I.B. Scientific acoustical evidence establishes a high probability that two gunmen fired at President John F. Kennedy. Other scientific evidence does not preclude the possibility of two gunmen firing at the President. Scientific evidence negates some specific conspiracy allegations
• I.C. The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that President John F. Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy. The committee was unable to identify the other gunmen or the extent of the conspiracy

@Kobia2  , you midwit moron, get you some of this. ^

Cannonpointer » 16 Jan 2024, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 11:17 am

I had not - but thank you.

Now, if you will excuse me, I have a **** to attend to. Mille grazie.

good luck

The4thReich » 12 Nov 2023, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑

12 Nov 2023, 10:43 am

John F Kennedy was assassinated Nov 22 1963.  

Who killed him?

Was he killed by Israel because he didn't want them having a nuclear bomb?

Was he killed by Israel because he wanted AIPAC to register as a foreign agent?

Bernadine Dohrn did it.
 

Hank » 12 Nov 2023, 9:16 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Nov 2023, 9:16 pm

JFK was killed by a collaborated effort by the CIA FBI and the Italian Mafia. 

Like you media fed imbeciles know anything about anything. STFU!

The 4th Reich » 12 Nov 2023, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑

12 Nov 2023, 10:43 am

John F Kennedy was assassinated Nov 22 1963.  


 

I was in second grade at Greenwood elementary being subjected to some totally unappealing music during "music appreciation", in Hot Springs Ark., when the principle, Mr. Mosher, came in and told us Kennedy had been shot. We didn't understand it all at that young age.

Z09 » 16 Jan 2024, 4:54 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 4:54 pm

And Cannon...
Hunt's widow says her sons lied for financial gain...

And another claim is some guy from France killed JFK....He was the gassy knoll shooter
The problem is the French government said the guy was in prison on November 23 1963..

Deathbed confession" of involvement in Kennedy assassination
After Hunt's death, Howard St. John Hunt and David Hunt stated that their father had recorded several claims about himself and others being involved in a conspiracy to assassinate John F. Kennedy.[4][74] Notes and audio recordings were made. In the April 5, 2007, issue of Rolling Stone, St. John Hunt detailed a number of individuals purported to be implicated by his father, including Lyndon B. Johnson, Cord Meyer, David Atlee Phillips, Frank Sturgis, David Morales, Antonio Veciana, William Harvey, and an assassin he termed "French gunman grassy knoll" who many presume is Lucien Sarti.[4][75] The two sons alleged that their father cut the information from his memoirs to avoid possible perjury charges.[74] According to Hunt's widow and other children, the two sons took advantage of Hunt's loss of lucidity by coaching and exploiting him for financial gain and furthermore falsified accounts of Hunt's supposed confession.[74] The Los Angeles Times said they examined the materials offered by the sons to support the story and found them to be "inconclusive".[74]

Why don’t you use the quote button ?

this is what ankle biters do   
 

Z09 » 16 Jan 2024, 5:34 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 5:34 pm

Is this your new complaint?

  I’ll be damned

you do know how to use it   

so quit being a lil bitch

use it 

idiot
 

Z09 » 16 Jan 2024, 12:41 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 12:41 pm

The State Department paid for his ticket.
Correct!
With the understanding that Oswald paid back the loan....
Which he did....!!!

Oh!

Well, then - mystery solved. 

The mystery being whether you would name ONE MORE PERSON out of the 10,000 who renounced and moved to Russia that got to come back. 

You can't. Yet Oswald was not only let back in, the state department paid his way. ON LOAN. Very important - very very important. ON LOAN. That's a game changer, right there. 

Let's review the **** you have spewed, shall we, tard? No evidence - the House Select Committee on Assassinations strongly disagrees. The grand jury, judge and prosecutor in the criminal trial alleging a conspiracy say you're full of ****. No deathbed confession. E. Howard Hunt's heirs and assigns say you're full of ****. I say you're full of ****. Anyone with a brain reading this thread says you're full of ****. 

You are a complacent mop-girl who thinks she knows stuff and runs her head like she knows stuff but doesn't know stuff. And @Kobia2  is your male doppelganger. Midwits and mouth-runners with no reverse gear. 

Nothing wrong with getting it wrong - plenty wrong with unearned arrogance, you garden vermin.

All doo respect.  

 
 

Z09 » 16 Jan 2024, 12:40 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 12:40 pm

Cannon
You seem to think calling someone ***, slut, **** or whore makes you right.
It actually shows that you can't handle an honest debate

Answering some sloppy bar hor with an appropriate **** you isn't a debate.

Z09 » 16 Jan 2024, 12:40 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 12:40 pm

Can you denouce your citizenship and then come back to the US like Oswald?
Yes
100%
The law and the procedure is all over the internet.
Simply because Oswald is the most famous person that did it, it doesn't mean others haven't.

First, it's REnounded not denounced. Second, can you name ONE OTHER PERSON who was allowed?
No.
100%.

I can name many who BEGGED and were denied.

Z09 » 16 Jan 2024, 12:40 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 12:40 pm

Just because Oswald is the most famous person that did it that doesn't mean others haven't.

You have GOOGLE.

Name one.

Z09 » 16 Jan 2024, 12:40 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 12:40 pm

Also, the State Department gave Oswald the funds to travel back to the US.
And he repaid the loan.

Inorite? Not only is he the exception - they PAID to get their patsy back stateside.

Z09 » 16 Jan 2024, 12:40 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 12:40 pm

Oswald first went to the US Embassy on October 31, 1959, to renounce his US citizenship and met with US Consul Richard Snyder. Snyder thought of him as a naive, misguided individual who would change his mind. Snyder sent him on his way without acting on his request.

SEE, you cow?

I TOLD you that you have google.

Now give us ONE OTHER PERSON who was allowed back after "denouncing" their citizenship. GO!
 

Z09 » 16 Jan 2024, 7:07 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 7:07 pm

Cannon..
Question..
You're saying Oswald was the only person that ever denounced his citizenship and was allowed to return correct?

If you say so, trollop. 

What I have ACTUALLY done is challenge you to name another. 

I'm guessing you found one, since you worked up the nerve to tag me this time, ignoramus.

So, **** the name. Let's see it. 
 

Z09 » 16 Jan 2024, 7:15 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 7:15 pm

Listen..
IM trying to have a honest debate..

But if you're going to call people ***, sluts and **** I rather just not answer 

Try growing up

So that's a no, then. 

You STILL cannot find a name, after all that googling. 

Very interesting. But STUPIT.
 

Z09 » 16 Jan 2024, 7:05 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 7:05 pm

Hunts own wife said her own children were doing it out of financial gain..
How do you explain that?

I don't, retard. And I don't have to. It's EXISTENCE proves you were full of **** when you blithely mouthed, "no deathbed confession."

If you're too stupid to understand that people can be leaned on, who am I to wake up the herd?

Z09 » 16 Jan 2024, 7:05 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2024, 7:05 pm

So Hunt claims Lyndon Johnson was behind the assassination?
I simply don't believe that.

And more important
Where's the evidence?

Wait. Are you REALLY trying to argue the MERITS of a deathbed confession you just got through denying exists?

So, you were full of ****, then, yes? Why would I even CONSIDER arguing the merits of a deathbed confession that we have not even agreed EXISTS?

I swear, if you have one honest bone in your body, you tricked the fella who put it there.