He threatened the CIA ...and the Deepstate ...
Of course he had a handler....
This^ is very typical of the progressive neocon right. They INSIST that the people who run their **** are "stupid," and they are, themselves, too stupid to understand that in declaring such, they are admitting that they are even stupider than the "stupid" people who run their **** - the "stupid" people who tell them which side of their bread to butter and how much butter to apply.Z09 » 13 Nov 2023, 5:56 am » wrote: ↑ No he wasn't...
You really think all these organizations got together and planned a murder?
They couldn't keep the planning stage a secret for 5 minutes.
He declared himself a patsy in his only opportunity to speak to the press, and was never allowed to speak another word in public - having been executed in police custody by a mob connected terminal cancer patient.Z09 » 13 Nov 2023, 5:56 am » wrote: ↑ Every bit of evidence points to Oswald who right after the shooting fled and tried to hide.
Evidence of an innocent man?
Possibly over what was happening in Vietnam.
Google "intersectionalism," twat (rhymes with hat).Z09 » 13 Nov 2023, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑ And after 60 years every investigation leads to one shooter.
Oswald
The most remarkable thing about all these crazy theories is that they contradict each other....
I just read it was LBJ, Nixon and Bush that did it...
There's another poster Xavier that claims the Secret Service killed JFK..
It goes on and on
Again....Z09 » 13 Nov 2023, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑ And after 60 years every investigation leads to one shooter.
Oswald
The most remarkable thing about all these crazy theories is that they contradict each other....
I just read it was LBJ, Nixon and Bush that did it...
There's another poster Xavier that claims the Secret Service killed JFK..
It goes on and on
oSWALD'S HANDLER WAS GEORGE de mORENORENSCHILT fact!Majik » 13 Nov 2023, 12:52 pm » wrote: ↑ That's where your logic is totally broken....
you seem to think that multiple Agencies needed to be privy ......
when the only people that needed to know the truth was Oswald's CIA handler , Ruby's CIA handler and the Dulles Cabal that ordered the assassination ......
Of course there is no evidence ....Z09 » 13 Nov 2023, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Tools of disinformation?
There's been government and independent investigations on the crime.
Hundreds of books...
And after 60 years still there's no evidence there was anyone but Oswald.
Possibilities of other scenarios?
Sure!
But no evidence
A good bet....
Hello friend.The4thReich » 12 Nov 2023, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑ John F Kennedy was assassinated Nov 22 1963.
Who killed him?
Was he killed by Israel because he didn't want them having a nuclear bomb?
Was he killed by Israel because he wanted AIPAC to register as a foreign agent?
Friend,
You believe Oswald was brainwashed into Assassinating JFK ----- then tried to get caught ---- and finally assassinated himself by Jack Ruby?Majik » 13 Nov 2023, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑ Not if he was meant to be caught in the first place and assassinated. ..
The CIA for 20 years prior was engaged in all forms of brainwashing techniques trying to create sleeper assassins who could be imbedded in any country and who could be used merely by calling them on a phone and using a code word to activate them.
why is it so implausible that Oswald wasn't one of them ?
Considering even today the CIA is shrouded in secrecy and has no true oversight by our Government and is heavily compartmentalized to such an extent they routinely tell Congress to pump sand ....
How many people have 6 CIA connections .....go?Kobia2 » 13 Nov 2023, 6:22 pm » wrote: ↑ You believe Oswald was brainwashed into Assassinating JFK ----- then tried to get caught ---- and finally assassinated himself by Jack Ruby?
Don't you think had that been the end game, he have just shot himself up there on the 6th floor of the School Book Depository after killing Kennedy?
I mentioned in a previous post there were scores of individuals, groups and organizations who would have had motive to assassinate JFK... Some of these theories seem plausible --- others ridiculous.. I'm going with the best hard evidence we have --- and that points to Oswald...
She's a low brow. The white noise paralyzes her - as intended.Majik » 13 Nov 2023, 1:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Again....
what investigations?
The Warren Commission was a joke .....and a show trial by LBJ ....
anybody who actually knows how the CIA operates knows full well that politicians and presidents have no jurisdiction over the CIA which operates with no oversight like it has from the very beginning ....
They lie constantly to Congress ....
JFK saw that the CIA was a rogue agency back then and threatened their power .....
and it cost him his life ....
oh and by the way the other theories you have mentioned contradict each other because many are simply tools of disinformation to distort .....
No evidence, the stupid hor insists - yet there were actual INDICTMENTS and a criminal trial.Z09 » 13 Nov 2023, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Tools of disinformation?
There's been government and independent investigations on the crime.
Hundreds of books...
And after 60 years still there's no evidence there was anyone but Oswald.
Possibilities of other scenarios?
Sure!
But no evidence
Less than three - while dying of cancer.
No ****, dumb ***. He agreed to take out the patsy because he didn't expect to live more than 6 months.
Of course you are, midwit. Of course you are.Kobia2 » 13 Nov 2023, 6:22 pm » wrote: ↑ You believe Oswald was brainwashed into Assassinating JFK ----- then tried to get caught ---- and finally assassinated himself by Jack Ruby?
Don't you think had that been the end game, he have just shot himself up there on the 6th floor of the School Book Depository after killing Kennedy?
I mentioned in a previous post there were scores of individuals, groups and organizations who would have had motive to assassinate JFK... Some of these theories seem plausible --- others ridiculous.. I'm going with the best hard evidence we have --- and that points to Oswald...