I'll kick in. ^^^
§2383. Rebellion or insurrection Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.golfboy » 28 Nov 2023, 10:06 pm » wrote: ↑ Once again, mainbitch makes an absurd claim, and can't back it up.
Why am I not surprised.
golfboy » 28 Nov 2023, 10:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Just look around you, *******.
Those people are NOT laughing WITH you.
Cannonpointer » 28 Nov 2023, 10:11 pm » wrote: ↑ So you're willing to make up crimes but you won't make up sentences?
I think **** likes you, but he's retarded, too.
Like I said. You're willing to make up crimes.
Cannonpointer » 29 Nov 2023, 3:48 pm » wrote: ↑ Like I said. You're willing to make up crimes.
Mouth **** all you want. 2nd Amendment advocates did NOT, as you insist, attempt an insurrection and forget their guns at home, you stewpid, brain-**** goon.
Yeah yeah - a bunch of fat, fox-fed fools were pulling a "bloodless coup" - from the outside. 3/4 of the "revolutionaries" were on heart meds, you jaggov.
Oh, yes, yes, queer boi - the due process has been RIGHT by the book. It has been the most transparent and well run criminal prosecution in this nation's herstory.maineman » 29 Nov 2023, 4:08 pm » wrote: ↑I didn't "make up" any crimes. J6ers have been charged, tried, and convicted by juries of their peers for committing real crimes.
When you mouth-**** think-tank slop, you presumptuous jackanape, grandiloquent invective is de rigueur.maineman » 29 Nov 2023, 4:08 pm » wrote: ↑ And why don't we try to raise the bar of our discussions and dial back the gratuitous insults?
Just a thought.
Well done mainbitch!maineman » 29 Nov 2023, 8:29 am » wrote: ↑ §2383. Rebellion or insurrection Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
§2384. Seditious conspiracy If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
Once again, I don't need to. You do this to yourself, Room Temp.
There has never been an unarmed insurrection in the history of the world.Cannonpointer » 29 Nov 2023, 4:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah yeah - a bunch of fat, fox-fed fools were pulling a "bloodless coup" - from the outside. 3/4 or the "revolutionaries" were on heart meds, you jaggov.
Oh, yes, yes, queer boi - the due process has been RIGHT by the book. It has been the most transparent and well run criminal prosecution in this nation's herstory.
When you mouth-**** think tank slop, you presumptuous jackanape, grandiloquent invective is de rigueur.
THAYUH. Ah raised the tone. ^
golfboy » 29 Nov 2023, 7:31 pm » wrote: ↑ Once again, I don't need to. You do this to yourself, Room Temp.
golfboy » 29 Nov 2023, 7:32 pm » wrote: ↑ There has never been an unarmed insurrection in the history of the world.
Except in the mind of idiots like mainbitch.
golfboy » 29 Nov 2023, 7:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Well done mainbitch!
Did you call your daughter and beg her to bail you out?
A bloodless coup by street rabble is absolute fiction. It is preposterous and girly to even suggest such.maineman » 29 Nov 2023, 11:07 pm » wrote: ↑ golfboi thinks that a "bloodless coup" is a complete fiction.
Cannonpointer » 30 Nov 2023, 1:50 am » wrote: ↑ A bloodless coup by street rabble is absolute fiction. It is preposterous and girly to even suggest such.
Name us one. Take your time and google up. Perhaps your fu is superior to mine.
Name a bloodless coup pulled off by street rabble. Ever. In the history of herstory.
Name a bloody destruction of people denying now is eternity stop people from never accepting genetics eternally separates the numbers here now, one at a time.Cannonpointer » 30 Nov 2023, 1:50 am » wrote: ↑ A bloodless coup by street rabble is absolute fiction. It is preposterous and girly to even suggest such.
Name us one. Take your time and google up. Perhaps your fu is superior to mine.
Name a bloodless coup pulled off by street rabble. Ever. In the history of herstory.
yawn...Cannonpointer » 30 Nov 2023, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Okay, Bluffy McBluffenstuff. YOUR OWN LINK calls them revolutions - not COUPS.
There has NEVER been a bloodless coup pulled off by street rabble. Your cite of the Philippines is hilarious, since we all lived through that and we all know that tens of millions - not a few dozen - were involved in PRESSURING THE SYSTEM to remove a sick old dictator that the U.S. was propping up.
That was an uprising - just as YOUR OWN LINK states. It was ANYTHING but a coup, you dissembling fruitcake. Had it been a coup, dictator b would have replaced dictator a.
You need to do some more googling - but this time, go here: www.dictionary.com