Why the **** don't you get out?
Shut the **** up.....the Swamp DC Estab Creeper.
So video of some portion of the crowd conclusively proves that no one in the crowd broke through barriers?golfboy » 18 Nov 2023, 9:50 pm » wrote: ↑ You're a liar. I showed you the video of the crowd doing NOTHING, and the cops firing tear gas, CAUSING the people in front to surge forward to escape the gas.
But you have no honor. You don't care about the truth.
All you care about is advancing your ignorant agenda.
IMAGINE NOT SEEING THE VIDEOS OF CAPITOL POLICE WITHOUT DURESS REMOVING BARRIERS TO ALLOW PROTESTORS TO ENTER THE CAPITOL.maineman » 18 Nov 2023, 5:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Imagine that there had been hundreds of different video cameras recording the events of the day in Dealey Plaza in Dallas, TX on November, 22nd, 1963. Thousands of hours of video showing tens of thousands of happy Texans excited about seeing their president. I guess the mere volume of innocuous videotape would be proof positive that nothing horrific could have possibly happened that day. And if some sharp investigative journalist had uncovered thousands of MORE hours of videotape years later, that would have further proven the absolute innocence of that day in American history. That makes perfect sense… right?
his loyalties lie in both Russia and China, in that order. and obsessively.
As I said, your lies were debunked a LONG time ago.maineman » 18 Nov 2023, 10:05 pm » wrote: ↑ So video of some portion of the crowd conclusively proves that no one in the crowd broke through barriers?
Is that level of stupidity a willful act or is it contrived?
Conclusively proves it wasn't a pervasively violent insurrection as advertised. Proves the media showed the most violent offenders on a loop while they avoided showing similar outbursts of violence during the George Floyd love riots.maineman » 18 Nov 2023, 10:05 pm » wrote: ↑ So video of some portion of the crowd conclusively proves that no one in the crowd broke through barriers?
Is that level of stupidity a willful act or is it contrived?
What is the biggest takeaway?
But,but BLM!!!!!Neo » 18 Nov 2023, 10:45 pm » wrote: ↑ Conclusively proves it wasn't a pervasively violent insurrection as advertised. Proves the media showed the most violent offenders on a loop while they avoided showing similar outbursts of violence during the George Floyd love riots.
Here's the problem. If people who were present at Dealey Plaza that day, cheering and waving flags while the presidential motorcade went past (or just standing and watching), suddenly had found themselves arrested and imprisoned for insurrection and assassination of a president - it would perhaps be a somewhat more fitting analogy. However, that didn't happen, and I don't think there's anyone on this side of the psych-ward doors, who'd think such a development would be anything other than downright predatory and evil.maineman » 18 Nov 2023, 9:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Nobody in government promoted violence.
After the barriers had been breached by an overwhelming insurrectionist force, LEO’s stood down,
Who cares. Most of the folks in Dealey Plaza were peaceful on 11/22/63.
There was no loop. They wrongly believed they could act like antifa or blm and get treated gently. They made the presumption the treatment would be equally under the law. They also went to a rally supporting a republican in Washington DC called stop the steal, expecting their presence would change the outcome of the election. Not dealing with America's brightest.Squatchman » 18 Nov 2023, 11:17 pm » wrote: ↑ But,but BLM!!!!!
. Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.
A lot of trump supporters going to prison for their part in it. Were all of them in that "loop?"
One just got convicted. Looking at 20 years for 7 felonies accrued that day.
Sweet justice.
I wouldn't be so sure of that..Squatchman » 18 Nov 2023, 11:17 pm » wrote: ↑ But,but BLM!!!!!
. Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.
A lot of trump supporters going to prison for their part in it. Were all of them in that "loop?"
One just got convicted. Looking at 20 years for 7 felonies accrued that day.
Sweet justice.
I don’t lie and you have debunked nothing.golfboy » 18 Nov 2023, 10:26 pm » wrote: ↑ As I said, your lies were debunked a LONG time ago.
But for some reason, you always repeat your debunked lies, as though you hadn't had them shoved up your fat ***.
I love how you can claim to be able to determine individual’s motivations by watching videotape of them.golfboy » 18 Nov 2023, 9:50 pm » wrote: ↑ You're a liar. I showed you the video of the crowd doing NOTHING, and the cops firing tear gas, CAUSING the people in front to surge forward to escape the gas.
But you have no honor. You don't care about the truth.
All you care about is advancing your ignorant agenda.
maineman » 18 Nov 2023, 9:36 pm » wrote: ↑ in the crowd? Thank God they were.
Starting it? No evidence of that.
J6’rs were filmed smashing through windows And breaking through barriers.
None off those assholes Were innocent.

But,but BLM!!Z09 » 19 Nov 2023, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑ Interesting...
BLM were smashing, setting fires and breaking through barriers...
And then looting..
And it was all over the country..
Tell us....
How many of those people went to jail?
BUTWHATABOUT is all he/she ever has