NO QUSTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
NO QUSTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
NO QUSTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
US sanctions currently specify that once Russian crude oil is transported to a third country and refined into another product (diesel, gasoline, jet fuel), that product is no longer considered of Russian origin –R.Suave » 22 Nov 2023, 7:49 am » wrote: ↑ US oil output has increased this year by about 700,000 to 800,000 barrels a day more than initially expected
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... nd=premium
Isn't it great to be so great again?
We're pumping record amounts of oil, cage free eggs are 2.00/dz, Pootie is getting his grapes stomped, and Israeli hostages are being released.
MAGA!
It's inevitable....oil is a fungible commidity...Majik » 04 Jan 2024, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑ US sanctions currently specify that once Russian crude oil is transported to a third country and refined into another product (diesel, gasoline, jet fuel), that product is no longer considered of Russian origin –
The U.S. is still buying Russian oil and oil products ....Idiot.
Blowing up the Nordstream pipeline might have necessitated the purchase of more deisel in all of Europe, to power the natural gas-starved nations. That would certainly create more demand - and more atmospheric C02.R.Suave » 04 Jan 2024, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑
But that doesn't explain why our exports are at considerably higher levels than at any time during the Grifty Pretzelduncy.
Paranoid twaddle but, to your credit, almost coherent in its logic.Cannonpointer » 04 Jan 2024, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑ Blowing up the Nordstream pipeline might have necessitated the purchase of more deisel in all of Europe, to power the natural gas-starved nations. That would certainly create more demand - and more atmospheric C02.
If the orange menace had been more willing to engage in state terrorism, he could have posted bettter numbers.
Why are we importing Russian oil... if as you say there is considerably higher levels of oil to export ....?R.Suave » 04 Jan 2024, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑ It's inevitable....oil is a fungible commidity...
But that doesn't explain why our exports are at considerably higher levels than at any time during the Grifty Pretzelduncy.
Nice try....R.Suave » 04 Jan 2024, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑ It's inevitable....oil is a fungible commidity...
But that doesn't explain why our exports are at considerably higher levels than at any time during the Grifty Pretzelduncy.
Majik » 04 Jan 2024, 12:09 pm » wrote: ↑ Nice try....
but ....The Pentagon Is Buying Fuel Made with Russian OilThe DOD awarded nearly $1B to a Greek refinery that imports Russian oil. It could help fuel Putin's invasion.
Nov 14, 2023
Jason Paladino
https://www.pogo.org/investigations/the-pentagon-is-buying-fuel-made-with-russian-oil
So, Idiot why is the Pentagon buying Russian oil if as you claim we have considerably higher levels of oil for export ?
You fell for this Administration's lies .....
They aren't.why is the Pentagon buying Russian oil
You fell for another Drudge headline.You fell for this Administration's lies
December 4, 2023 at 5:00 a.m. ESTR.Suave » 04 Jan 2024, 1:35 pm » wrote: ↑ They aren't.
You fell for another Drudge headline.
Ask me why..
They aren't "buying russian oil".Majik » 04 Jan 2024, 1:52 pm » wrote: ↑ December 4, 2023 at 5:00 a.m. EST
The Pentagon is facing congressional pressure to stop the flow of Russian oil into its supply chain after a Washington Post examination revealing that shipments of the forbidden fuel have been making their way to a refinery that serves the U.S. military.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business ... s-defense/
So, why is the Pentagon buying Russian oil and defying their own sanctions if as you say we have all of this excess oil to export?
And you are now in check.
They are circumventing their own sanctions with a technicality ......
They are buying REFINED PRODUCT from the refinery most proximate to where they need it.Majik » 04 Jan 2024, 2:09 pm » wrote: ↑ They are circumventing their own sanctions with a technicality ......
admit it ....
You are a lying idiot. eat a dog turd and choke.Nostradamus' omh » 03 Jan 2024, 5:32 pm » wrote: ↑ this so called mindless babbler got you to say yes twice to the question of your reality imploding.
Easy to name call. I notice you don't say what is paranoid ABOUT it - because you know you can't defend it. So you just gripe.R.Suave » 04 Jan 2024, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑ Paranoid twaddle but, to your credit, almost coherent in its logic.
Take what you're given and stop mewling.Cannonpointer » 04 Jan 2024, 4:00 pm » wrote: ↑ Easy to name call. I notice you don't say what is paranoid ABOUT it - because you know you can't defend it. So you just gripe.
The C02 from deisel generators is in fact much greater than the C02 from municipal power plants, skidmark. You can spit vitriol - ya just cannot challenge me on the facts.
Because I hear 20 or more presentations by oil producers every year...
Right - let your pabulum slide.