Very likely.Sumela » 26 Nov 2023, 11:39 am » wrote: ↑ Recall Obama had the NSA spy on AP journalists and the Senate foreign affairs committee.
Nobody cared. You are right sir, they spy and own most of ****. Hell, they likely
set them up with honeypots, blackmail. The big question is who OWNS the NSA and CIA....who is
calling the shots. Mossad and Pissrael? MIC?
Just checking in, here. You DO understand that the intelligence community is who's pushing ukraine and israel suckage - yes?RedheadedStranger » 26 Nov 2023, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑ A rare instance where Schumer tells the truth about the Intel Community.
Those who yowl for american interventions are in bed with them.RedheadedStranger » 26 Nov 2023, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑ Sounds like he has been in bed with them for decades.
Just about everyone that's been in DC for more than a decade is in bed with them... and most of the ones that have been there less want to be in bed with them, but haven't earned enough chips yet.Cannonpointer » 26 Nov 2023, 1:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Those who yowl for american interventions are in bed with them.
You DO understand this - yes?
Yeah that much I already knew you got.RedheadedStranger » 26 Nov 2023, 2:00 pm » wrote: ↑ Just about everyone that's been in DC for more than a decade is in bed with them... and most of the ones that have been there less want to be in bed with them, but haven't earned enough chips yet.
They have to prove their loyalty before they get to play ball.
Sure... and even some that don't.Cannonpointer » 26 Nov 2023, 2:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah that much I already knew you got.
I'm not talking about that.
Those REGULAR FOLKS who yowl for american interventions are in bed with them.
You DO understand this - yes?
No, I don't.RedheadedStranger » 26 Nov 2023, 2:07 pm » wrote: ↑ Sure... and even some that don't.
You understand that too - yes?
You've been talking to Smello again haven't you.Cannonpointer » 26 Nov 2023, 2:09 pm » wrote: ↑ No, I don't.
In the matter of opposing american interventions, they are opposing the deep state that you support.
I know that the deep state wants american intervention in israel and ukraine, like you.RedheadedStranger » 26 Nov 2023, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑ You've been talking to Smello again haven't you.
You know he has a thing for prepubescent girls right?
You skipped your meds this morning didn't you?Cannonpointer » 26 Nov 2023, 2:17 pm » wrote: ↑ I know that the deep state wants american intervention in israel and ukraine, like you.
Those who yowl for american interventions are in bed with the deep state..
You DO understand this - yes?
It's a pretty stright forward, Y/N question - don't you think?
I don't believe it is the QUESTION you are ducking. I think it's the answer. You don't like the answer.
Was the answer yes, or no?RedheadedStranger » 26 Nov 2023, 2:18 pm » wrote: ↑ You skipped your meds this morning didn't you?
I already answered your question like 10 minutes ago.
Especially the NSA and alphabet agencies, they influence. not control!Majik » 26 Nov 2023, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑ Every politician has skeletons in their closet and the intel agencies and the CIA have been domestically spying on Americans for decades .
Including spying on Congress .....
I said "sure" and then followed it up with a question of my own... that you even answered yourself.Cannonpointer » 26 Nov 2023, 2:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Was the answer yes, or no?
Or did you do one of those politician things, where you hit reply but answer a different question?
This isn't anything new. Step out of line and they'll suicide or cause undiagnosed medical problems.Majik » 26 Nov 2023, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑ So, it seems nobody on here agrees with Tucker ....huh?
Except me ....
I was looking for this ..RedheadedStranger » 26 Nov 2023, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑ A rare instance where Schumer tells the truth about the Intel Community.
https://youtu.be/6OYyXv2l4-I?si=vDcu-OngWyEGdTDt
"The Intel community has six ways from Sunday at getting back at you"...
Sounds pretty unbiased huh?
Yes, you said "sure," as if you were not admitting that you support the deep state - and then you rushed past it with a distraction.RedheadedStranger » 26 Nov 2023, 2:42 pm » wrote: ↑ I said "sure" and then followed it up with a question of my own... that you even answered yourself.
Slow down... breathe... concentrate...
I can't help it if you don't like my answer.Cannonpointer » 26 Nov 2023, 3:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes, you said "sure," as if you were not admitting that you support the deep state - and then you rushed past it with a distraction.
It was not an answer - it was a skip-to-the-****-loo followed by a lookie-there.
An ANSWER would be you taking responsibility for the fact that YOUR position supports the deep state and those who oppose your position oppose the deep state.
It would look like you manning up - an aha moment. A come to Jesus. An honest yes answer would be attended by a commitment to stop supporting the deep state,.
You gave no honest answer.
I will keep asking from time to time until I get an honest answer. Put that in your pipe and smoke it, sneaky pete.
I can't help it if you fake-answer like an unaccountable girl.RedheadedStranger » 26 Nov 2023, 3:18 pm » wrote: ↑ I can't help it if you don't like my answer.
That's on you, not me.
Cannonpointer » 26 Nov 2023, 3:36 pm » wrote: ↑ I can't help it if you fake-answer like an unaccountable girl.
That's on you, not me.
www.dictionary.com/unaccountablelittlebitch/redhe...