The first day Putin said they had 2 objectives:GHETTOBLASTER » 28 Nov 2023, 8:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Exactly.
What I'm seeing now is a 90 degree pivot from "Why Russia is losing"...to "How Russia is both winning and losing"
He's farther left than homewrecker Mika. He's Liz Cheney conservative.golfboy » 28 Nov 2023, 9:27 pm » wrote: ↑ Clearly this makes Mornin' Joe a Right Wing Conspiracy Theorist.
russia did the mathGHETTOBLASTER » 28 Nov 2023, 8:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Now let's wonder why the [[[JWO]]] controlled MSM would do such a thing...?
Wrecking lives runs in her diseased family tree.Cannonpointer » 28 Nov 2023, 9:32 pm » wrote: ↑ He's farther left than homewrecker Mika. He's Liz Cheney conservative.
I wonder what all of this will do to birth rates ...from now on...?jerrab » 28 Nov 2023, 9:48 pm » wrote: ↑ russia did the math
---------------------------------From August 2021 to the present, President Joe Biden has used presidential drawdown authority under Section 506(a)(1) of the 1961 Foreign Assistance Act and congressional authority to authorize the transfer of roughly $23.7 billion worth of US defense equipment and weapons to Ukraine. (This $23.7 billion figure includes congressional authorizations that are still funding drawdowns.) This has dwarfed total US security aid to Ukraine in all previous years, which has hovered between $150 and $450 million annually since Russia’s 2014 invasion of Crimea.What the United States has provided has shifted over time, according to detailed lists of defense items sent to Ukraine which the Department of Defense began releasing in March. From December to February, roughly $550 million worth of Javelin anti-tank guided missiles, other anti-armor systems, body armor, munitions, and helicopters were transferred to Ukraine. This probably reflected Washington’s realization that Russia’s troop buildup was a prelude to a land invasion, against which Javelin anti-tank weapons would be useful.
Russia's troop buildup was not only preparation for war. It was also intended to get Ukraine to the table.jerrab » 28 Nov 2023, 9:48 pm » wrote: ↑ russia did the math
---------------------------------From August 2021 to the present, President Joe Biden has used presidential drawdown authority under Section 506(a)(1) of the 1961 Foreign Assistance Act and congressional authority to authorize the transfer of roughly $23.7 billion worth of US defense equipment and weapons to Ukraine. (This $23.7 billion figure includes congressional authorizations that are still funding drawdowns.) This has dwarfed total US security aid to Ukraine in all previous years, which has hovered between $150 and $450 million annually since Russia’s 2014 invasion of Crimea.What the United States has provided has shifted over time, according to detailed lists of defense items sent to Ukraine which the Department of Defense began releasing in March. From December to February, roughly $550 million worth of Javelin anti-tank guided missiles, other anti-armor systems, body armor, munitions, and helicopters were transferred to Ukraine. This probably reflected Washington’s realization that Russia’s troop buildup was a prelude to a land invasion, against which Javelin anti-tank weapons would be useful.
They're sending women to the front. I guess it depends on how long they keep that up. But there's also the millions who've fled. Then there are the casualties. Less people certainly means less babies. Less food means less babies. Vaccinations for covid means less babies. More poverty means less babies. Continued (certainly predictable) emigration means less babies.GHETTOBLASTER » 28 Nov 2023, 11:39 pm » wrote: ↑ I wonder what all of this will do to birth rates ...from now on...?
AND THE MEDIA!Cannonpointer » 28 Nov 2023, 7:31 pm » wrote: ↑ By redefining victory, of course.
Sound crazy?
Then you're forgotten they redefined woman. They redefined vaccine. They redefined racism. They get to make any word mean anything they want, because they own the fact checkers.
Also..once the people feel like they are helpless pawns being used to sacrifice their kids to an endless and hopeless war effort, then that should discourage the desire to have childrenCannonpointer » 29 Nov 2023, 12:25 am » wrote: ↑ They're sending women to the front. I guess it depends on how long they keep that up. But there's also the millions who've fled. Then there are the casualties. Less people certainly means less babies. Less food means less babies. Vaccinations for covid means less babies. More poverty means less babies. Continued (certainly predictable) emigration means less babies.
I'd say ukraine is gonna have a **** of a lot less babies for a **** of a long time to come. It's sad, because they are lovely people.
It was way too white and poor to be left standing. It was a source of handsome white children for europe's wealthy pedophiles. Now it's just a nightmare that can't wake up. And believe it or not, there are still MILLIONS and MILLIONS of Americans who believe that Ukraine is winning. And even after their media admits that Ukraine is not winning, they will STILL be told that Russia is losing, too.
Imagine BRAGGING that there are no winners, and treating that lie as a salve. The devil is loose, folks.

Well, ACKSHULLY... they kill more of their babies than any other demographic. They're number one by a country mile, followed by hispanics, "others," then whites.GHETTOBLASTER » 29 Nov 2023, 3:06 am » wrote: ↑ Also..once the people feel like they are helpless pawns being used to sacrifice their kids to an endless and hopeless war effort, then that should discourage the desire to have children
Oh wait what am I saying...this same scenario sure hasn't discouraged our Americanized Africans from pooping out more than their fair share of de chillrens 'nsheet.
Never mind.
Yes...!Cannonpointer » 29 Nov 2023, 3:10 am » wrote: ↑ Well, ACKSHULLY... they kill more of their babies than any other demographic. They're number one by a country mile, followed by hispanics, "others," then whites.
Black mummies are just shy of three times more likely than white women to abort.
Texas and several other states are about to find out the hard way.GHETTOBLASTER » 29 Nov 2023, 3:15 am » wrote: ↑ Yes...!
Without easy peasy abortion for the past several years we might have 80 MILLION ****** IN THE USA instead of "only" 40 million.
Now let that sink in...
Cannonpointer » 29 Nov 2023, 3:21 am » wrote: ↑ Texas and several other states are about to find out the hard way.
Texas is so huge that it's going to hit there the hardest. If you live in Mississippi, Tennessee is a short car ride away. If you live in Texas, Texas and more Texas is a long car ride away. The logistics of interstate travel for an abortion are above the capacities - mental and financial - of the average ghetto queen.
A generation of street-raised apes is only 15 years away...
