maineman » 29 Nov 2023, 11:11 pm » wrote: ↑
so...you did not read the court filing that I provided the link to?
get back to me when you do.
until then, STFU.
I did read it, son. And I understand why you will not quote it.
Here is what I see. I see trump arguing that if he is wrong to say what he said, then the plaintiff needs to explain why the same language in the 2016 ICA was not wrong.
That's what I see.
And I suspect that is why you refuse to post any quote of Trump or his lawyers to back your claim - because you are not relying on what Trump actually said. You are relying on what your masters TELL YOU IT MEANS.
If Trump made the claim that the russia hoax was real, POST HIM DOING SO.
I cannot post what does not exist - and neither, apparently, can you. You are relying on your cult controllers - not on the evidence.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?