Tempest62 » 30 Nov 2023, 7:09 pm » wrote: ↑
Banning something is boorish and unimpressive. Any squat little **** dickless dictator can pull that. Like the American left. It’s ****** and lazy.
What needs to happen in America is to win the ground war with the had work and power of shame and embarrassment. This is self enforcing by society itself. Very cheap. Far more powerful than some **** head 2 bit govt edict that requires more big govt to enforce it.
Banning people from gaying up children isn't big government. It's good government.
I think size is less important than quality. If you visited a foreign land and their government buildings were grand and palatial and their roads were manicured, it would impress you. If you visited another land and their government buildings were mud huts on unpaved roads, you would SCOFF at that country - at its small government.
A government that lets perverts prey on your children and protects those perverts from your wrath is no better for being smaller than a government that protects your children. The entire concept of big vs. small is based on words that mean different things to everyone. People who want to ban abortion and fight drug wars and field massive armies insist they are for small government. Many who are against banning abortion and prohibiting drugs and fielding massive armies believe in big government, with socialized health care and higher education.
Tell me - is EITHER group for small government? The one that wants more freedom and liberty also wants government to manage more things for them. But the ones who advocate for smaller government are the ones writing checks on their grandchildren's credit.
I say it's not the size or even the scope of government, but the JOB of governments which matters - and that is to look to the welfare of their citizens. And pardon my saying, I think a government that lets predators access children in schools is less useful - whatever its size - than a government that protects its citizens' children. Likewise, a government that lets men invade women's safe spaces should bow its head to a government that punishes sex pests and protects women's dignity -
whatever those respective governments' size and scope.
No American is in any position to pass judgment on ANY government, living as he does in the fattest, sickest, most bellicose, most perverse and most fiscally profligate country on earth - a country that is exporting sexual deviancy and punishing all who will not sign onto its alphabet agenda.
Take note that the VERY FIRST FLAG the israelis raised in Gaza was a pride flag. Do not think for a moment that was happenstance. It was theater, symbolism - it was a mission statement and a policy declaration. The alphabet people who march under that flag have told us
precisely their intentions: "We're here, we're queer, we're coming for your children." Do you REALLY think a government should allow that, based on an ideological template which was written by men who could never have foreseen this blasphemy against the natural order? For that matter,
the template in question prevented **** like that for the first 200 years of our history - did it not? The Russians aren't doing anything we did not do, under OUR Constitution,
in your lifetime.
Whoever is shutting down the *** is doing the work of the angels. Not MY fault its Putin. Or maybe it is. Let's let Putin deal with HIS *** HIS way, while we continue to coddle, protect, and feed innocent children to ours - see who comes out ahead.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?