I wish I was contagious.
Round about aught eleventeen, as I recall.
Cannonpointer » 01 Dec 2023, 1:48 pm » wrote: ↑ But none does. They gave the seat away.
They were butthurt at being brilliantly satirized.
You're right, they gave the seat away. It's a tough call. The guy's a real piece of ****, but he'd probably still vote "R".Cannonpointer » 01 Dec 2023, 1:48 pm » wrote: ↑ But none does. They gave the seat away.
They were butthurt at being brilliantly satirized.
murdock » 01 Dec 2023, 2:18 pm » wrote: ↑ BTW, concerning Santos, what happened to innocent until proven guilty?
it figures that you would defend him/her Z09 » 01 Dec 2023, 2:20 pm » wrote: ↑ Actually he admitted he lied about his college and other points on his resume..
In the private sector he'd be fired.
And I'm glad he was expelled..
I didn't post any threads about him, but I have praised his comedy every time it came up.DeezerShoove » 01 Dec 2023, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑ I agree.
I posted a thread about his being a legend and a hero.
He could have worn a pink fright wig and a Madonna cone tit holder...
Listen douche, you already proved you can't read. Asking what I asked in no ways passes for defending anyone, you disingenuous piece of ****. So what happened to due process? Lol, I know you won't answer with anything other then spew.Mrkelly » 01 Dec 2023, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑it figures that you would defend him/her
![]()
[img]blob:536d4ae6-ae5e-4fb0-b0a5-e9f7ac046f0b[/img]
https://e00-marca.uecdn.es/assets/multi ... 708154.jpg
ARE You worried BOUT THAT? LOLOL YOU FILTHY PIG?murdock » 01 Dec 2023, 2:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Listen douche, you already proved you can't read. Asking what I asked in no ways passes for defending anyone, you disingenuous piece of ****.
Why would you call a brilliant satirist a piece of ****?Skans » 01 Dec 2023, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑ You're right, they gave the seat away. It's a tough call. The guy's a real piece of ****, but he'd probably still vote "R".
Innocent and until proven guilty.Skans » 01 Dec 2023, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑ You're right, they gave the seat away. It's a tough call. The guy's a real piece of ****, but he'd probably still vote "R".
What happened to it? Nothing - it applies to criminal prosecutions. Not members in Congress who committed fraud to get there and fraud (as in grotesque fraud, not just accounting errors or mistakes) in their handling of campaign money. What part of CAMPAIGN MONEY IS NOT YOUR SLUSH FUND is too hard for the stupid spic to understand?murdock » 01 Dec 2023, 2:18 pm » wrote: ↑ BTW, concerning Santos, what happened to innocent until proven guilty?
I listened to an entire radio show outlining what he did. Seriously, go do some research first before you expect me or others to spoon-feed you here.
Skans » 01 Dec 2023, 2:36 pm » wrote: ↑ What happened to it? Nothing - it applies to criminal prosecutions. Not members in Congress who committed fraud to get there and fraud (as in grotesque fraud, not just accounting errors or mistakes) in their handling of campaign money. What part of CAMPAIGN MONEY IS NOT YOUR SLUSH FUND is too hard for the stupid spic to understand?
Do you seriously NOT understand that Congress is not prosecuting the little cock-sucker for any crime? I mean, is that really the level of your understanding?
YOU DO NOT BELONG HERE!
Skans » 01 Dec 2023, 2:38 pm » wrote: ↑ I listened to an entire radio show outlining what he did. Seriously, go do some research first before you expect me or others to spoon-feed you here.
Shut up you and insane **** goddamned bitch!sootedupCyndi » 01 Dec 2023, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑ YOU DO NOT BELONG HERE!
GET OUT.. mental nut! you are our football!
due process is when he confessedmurdock » 01 Dec 2023, 2:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Listen douche, you already proved you can't read. Asking what I asked in no ways passes for defending anyone, you disingenuous piece of ****. So what happened to due process? Lol, I know you won't answer with anything other then spew.