Skans » 01 Dec 2023, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Do you seriously NOT understand that Congress is not prosecuting the little cock-sucker for any crime? I mean, is that really the level of your understanding?
Oh, I'd convict you for having such nasty stretch marks. I don't need any other reason to shout GUILTY at the end of your trial. Some people might actually care about your "rights" and your "freedom". I'm just not one of them.murdock » 01 Dec 2023, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Why did you believe what they say? Did they show proof or did they just talk? I'm not taking sides here, just pointing out how full of crap people are. You hear someone talk about it with claims they did this and that and that's proof of guilt? I'd sure hate to be accused of a crime I didn't do and have you on the jury.
You are so F-ing wrong.murdock » 01 Dec 2023, 2:49 pm » wrote: ↑ Damn you scum like to twist **** don't you? I know he's not accused of a crime, but innocent until proven guilty still applies. You can't seem to grasp that. If you accuse some of lying that may not be a crime but they are still either innocent of Lying until it is proven.
Ya gotta love a guy who thinks tuning in to K-Talk in the Morning is "doing research."Skans » 01 Dec 2023, 2:38 pm » wrote: ↑ I listened to an entire radio show outlining what he did. Seriously, go do some research first before you expect me or others to spoon-feed you here.
Z09 makes a good point. I may not agree that it should be used to save Santos' bacon, but she makes a good point regardless.Z09 » 01 Dec 2023, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑ On July 20, 1983, the House voted to censure Studds, by a vote of 420–3.[5] In addition, the Democratic leadership stripped Studds of his chairmanship of the House Merchant Marine Subcommittee. Studds received two standing ovations from supporters in his home district at his first town meeting following his congressional censure.[7]
Studds defended his sexual involvement as a "consensual relationship with a young adult." Dean Hara, whom Studds married in 2004, said after Studds' death in 2006 that Studds had never been ashamed of the relationship.[8] In testimony to investigators, the page described the relationship as consensual and not intimidating.[9]
Although Studds said he disagreed with the committee's findings of improper sexual conduct, he waived his right to public hearings on the allegations in order to protect the privacy of those involved:
"...I have foremost in my mind the need to protect, to the extent it is still possible given the committee's action, the privacy of other individuals affected by these allegations," said Studds. "Those individuals have a right to personal privacy that would be inevitably and irremediably shattered if I were to insist on public hearings...."
Studds said that deciding not to have a hearing "presented me with the most difficult choice I have had to make in my life."[10]
Studds was re-elected to the House six more times after the 1983 censure
Should it REALLY be called a confession?
Skans » 01 Dec 2023, 2:49 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh, I'd convict you for having such nasty stretch marks. I don't need any other reason to shout GUILTY at the end of your trial. Some people might actually care about your "rights" and your "freedom". I'm just not one of them.
Shut up, asshole. When it comes to music, I listen to K-pop. When it comes to news, I listen to the ghost of Art Bell.Cannonpointer » 01 Dec 2023, 2:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Ya gotta love a guy who thinks tuning in to K-Talk in the Morning is "doing research."
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Bro, THANK YOU for getting that cockroach off my ball sac.Skans » 01 Dec 2023, 2:49 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh, I'd convict you for having such nasty stretch marks. I don't need any other reason to shout GUILTY at the end of your trial. Some people might actually care about your "rights" and your "freedom". I'm just not one of them.
Cannonpointer » 01 Dec 2023, 2:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Ya gotta love a guy who thinks tuning in to K-Talk in the Morning is "doing research."
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Yeah.Z09 » 01 Dec 2023, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Let me educate you then...
2 men..
Both having sex with pages.
One ran again and was defeated.
I think I mentioned he resigned.
I do. Every day.murdock » 01 Dec 2023, 2:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Good little nazi. Thank the founders for the second amendment.
Cannonpointer » 01 Dec 2023, 2:28 pm » wrote: ↑ I didn't post any threads about him, but I have praised his comedy every time it came up.
The guy is a regular Andy Kaufman.
#1 Santos: Legend
She makes an even better pie.Skans » 01 Dec 2023, 2:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Z09 makes a good point. I may not agree that it should be used to save Santos' bacon, but she makes a good point regardless.
Cannonpointer » 01 Dec 2023, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑ She makes an even better pie.
I wish she would shut the **** up and get back in the kitchen.
i kind if think push comes to shoves... not a man on HERE? will defend you? NUT...