Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Illegals now coming in on boats....Great way to run a country...
Illegals now coming in on boats....Great way to run a country...
By Deezer Shoove
2 Dec 2023 8:09 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
3 Dec 2023 5:22 pm
I look forward to day robot replaces union members and surgeons and nurses and electricians and plumbersGHETTOBLASTER » 03 Dec 2023, 6:10 pm » wrote: ↑ The technonology required to replace a plumber or a surgeon with a fully autonomous robot in an economically feasible way is well beyond what you think it is
AI is smarter than you
https://www.nibib.nih.gov/news-events/n ... human-help
https://youtu.be/urUEJ0t-ywE
3 Dec 2023 5:25 pm
Sergei » 03 Dec 2023, 6:22 pm » wrote: ↑ I look forward to day robot replaces union members and surgeons and nurses and electricians and plumbers
AI is smarter than you
https://www.nibib.nih.gov/news-events/n ... human-help
https://youtu.be/urUEJ0t-ywE
Well you're a troll and trollin' is what trolls do on any given sunday afternoon
3 Dec 2023 5:29 pm
I accept your surrenderGHETTOBLASTER » 03 Dec 2023, 6:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Well you're a troll and trollin' is what trolls do on any given sunday afternoon
Sergei
3 Dec 2023 5:34 pm
First, your claim that "a massive MIC driven budget expansion" was "going to happen regardless of who the CIC was?" Who the **** told you THAT?GHETTOBLASTER » 03 Dec 2023, 6:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Carter correctly and very honestly described the treatment of Arabs by Israelis as APERTHEID and then was forced by the [[[JWO]]] to recant.
Other than that...the [[[JWO / MSM]]] praises everything that a Democrat does and visa versa with Repubs
You blame Reagan for a massive MIC driven budget expansion that was going to happen regardless of who the CIC was.
Second, your pretense that there are all these **** fluff pieces on JIMMY CARTER has to be one of the most outlandish, unsupportable fantasies I have seen on this board. NOBODY supports carter. There is one class of people and one only that supports carter - free thinkers unaligned with either party.
The official narrative is, "He was a great fella, but he sucked as a president." That's it - that's the narrative, and you're not gonna show us anything different.
All these fantasy world puff pieces lionizing carter as a great president live only in your mind, sir. I make THAT statement with nary a concern that you will refute it with any of these fantasy puff pieces you have invented from whole cloth.
Yes, the press favors the democrat party. No, they do not shill for Carter. They shill for reagan, because he was a big spending democrat, where carter was a small government conservative dixiecrat.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
3 Dec 2023 5:50 pm
Go ahead and link all you want to articles that 'Slam Carter" and "Shill for Reagan". There is a Reagan Foundation that "shills for him"...but show me others.Cannonpointer » 03 Dec 2023, 6:34 pm » wrote: ↑ First, your claim that "a massive MIC driven budget expansion" was "going to happen regardless of who the CIC was?" Who the **** told you THAT?
Second, your pretense that there are all these **** fluff pieces on JIMMY CARTER has to be one of the most outlandish, unsupportable fantasies I have seen on this board. NOBODY supports carter. There is one class of people and one only that supports carter - free thinkers unaligned with either party.
The official narrative is, "He was a great fella, but he sucked as a president." That's it - that's the narrative, and you're not gonna show us anything different.
All these fantasy world puff pieces lionizing carter as a great president live only in your mind, sir. I make THAT statement with nary a concern that you will refute it with any of these fantasy puff pieces you have invented from whole cloth.
Yes, the press favors the democrat party. No, they do not shill for Carter. They shill for reagan, because he was a big spending democrat, where carter was a small government conservative dixiecrat.
3 Dec 2023 5:54 pm
GHETTOBLASTER » 03 Dec 2023, 6:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Go ahead and link all you want to articles that 'Slam Carter" and "Shill for Reagan". There is a Reagan Foundation that "shills for him"...but show me others.
The gipper
The great communicator
These^ are names THE PRESS gave him. Get a clue, son. You are meandering into a minefield like a drunken soldier.
Don't make me set a nuke off under your ***.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
3 Dec 2023 5:56 pm
yawnCannonpointer » 03 Dec 2023, 6:54 pm » wrote: ↑
The gipper
The great communicator
These^ are names THE PRESS gave him. Get a clue, son. You are meandering into a minefield like a drunken soldier.
Don't make me set a nuke off under your ***.
I really DO have paint drying right now
3 Dec 2023 5:58 pm
You arta let it dry, then. Your silly narrative that carter got a pass and reagan was treated unfairly is a non starter.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
3 Dec 2023 6:00 pm
Cannonpointer » 03 Dec 2023, 6:58 pm » wrote: ↑ You arta let it dry, then. Your silly narrative that carter got a pass and reagan was treated unfairly is a non starter.
still waiting
3 Dec 2023 6:03 pm
you're the guy who thinks [[[Casper Weinberger]]] worked for Reagan and not visa versa...!!!Cannonpointer » 03 Dec 2023, 6:58 pm » wrote: ↑ You arta let it dry, then. Your silly narrative that carter got a pass and reagan was treated unfairly is a non starter.
3 Dec 2023 6:23 pm
Keep waiting - you made the claim of all these love letters the MSM wrote carter.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
3 Dec 2023 6:31 pm
No, that appears to be you. I'm not a reagan defender.GHETTOBLASTER » 03 Dec 2023, 7:03 pm » wrote: ↑ you're the guy who thinks [[[Casper Weinberger]]] worked for Reagan and not visa versa...!!!
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
3 Dec 2023 6:35 pm
No..I'm the one who claims the MIC was in charge of Reagan and you are the one who ridiculed that notionCannonpointer » 03 Dec 2023, 7:31 pm » wrote: ↑ No, that appears to be you. I'm not a reagan defender.
Try to be consistent.
3 Dec 2023 6:35 pm
3 Dec 2023 6:43 pm
I ridiculed your claim that the give-away to the MIC needed to be done and would have been done under any CIC. I know full well reagan was their tool. I questioned your pretense that he is not to blame for it.GHETTOBLASTER » 03 Dec 2023, 7:35 pm » wrote: ↑ No..I'm the one who claims the MIC was in charge of Reagan and you are the one who ridiculed that notion
Try to be consistent.
Try to stop deflecting.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
3 Dec 2023 6:47 pm
The MIC build up after losing Vietnam was inevitable.Cannonpointer » 03 Dec 2023, 7:43 pm » wrote: ↑ I ridiculed your claim that the give-away to the MIC needed to be done and would have been done under any CIC. I know full well reagan was their tool. I questioned your pretense that he is not to blame for it.
Try to stop deflecting.
DO YOU REALLY THINK THAT WAS REAGAN'S CALL...?
The massive buildup benefitted more Americans than you are aware of too.
3 Dec 2023 6:57 pm
Yes, I think it was reagan's call - and no, I don't think it was necessary or inevitable.GHETTOBLASTER » 03 Dec 2023, 7:47 pm » wrote: ↑ The MIC build up after losing Vietnam was inevitable.
DO YOU REALLY THINK THAT WAS REAGAN'S CALL...?
The massive buildup benefitted more Americans than you are aware of too.
Nor do I believe the buildup benefitted a great many americans. I believe it benefitted reagan's bosses - and I know that carter refused to do them that solid - which is why they replaced him. The MIC deliberately sabotaged his hostage rescue, and made a deal with the ayatollah to provide them with missile technology in exchange for keeping the hostages until inauguration day.
The amount of dirty **** done under reagan was probably unprecedented - and the complete lack of dirty **** pulled when carter was at the helm was equally so. Carter put a full stop to the shenanigans and worked for the american people under extremely adverse circumstances. He retired bureaucrats - reagan hired them, Carter shrunk government - reagan radically expanded it.
You want numbers? I have them handy. Just ax.
Carter was a clean and righteous man, and his days have been long on the earth. Reagan lived into his 80s I believe - but with dementia. Carter was a better man on monday that reagan was all week - and I'm happy to provide evidence of that. Chasing articles, no. Documenting facts - yes.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
3 Dec 2023 7:13 pm
Cannonpointer » 03 Dec 2023, 7:57 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes, I think it was reagan's call - and no, I don't think it was necessary or inevitable.
Nor do I believe the buildup benefitted a great many americans. I believe it benefitted reagan's bosses - and I know that carter refused to do them that solid - which is why they replaced him. The MIC deliberately sabotaged his hostage rescue, and made a deal with the ayatollah to provide them with missile technology in exchange for keeping the hostages until inauguration day.
The amount of dirty **** done under reagan was probably unprecedented - and the complete lack of dirty **** pulled when carter was at the helm was equally so. Carter put a full stop to the shenanigans and worked for the american people under extremely adverse circumstances. He retired bureaucrats - reagan hired them, Carter shrunk government - reagan radically expanded it.
You want numbers? I have them handy. Just ax.
Carter was a clean and righteous man, and his days have been long on the earth. Reagan lived into his 80s I believe - but with dementia. Carter was a better man on monday that reagan was all week - and I'm happy to provide evidence of that. Chasing articles, no. Documenting facts - yes.
Well I provide a timeline of cause and effect and you provide your feelings
3 Dec 2023 7:22 pm
Actually, you **** mouthed generalities about the media that you UTTERLY misapplied, you got corrected, you deflected, then I told you EXACTLY how the **** it was and offered PROOF, and you danced the **** that I am responding to now.GHETTOBLASTER » 03 Dec 2023, 8:13 pm » wrote: ↑Well I provide a timeline of cause and effect and you provide your feelings
YOU are the one who puked your "feelings" about how the press treats democ rats onto the board, and I am the one who said no, that is not correct, that did NOT happen with carter - or reagan. And you have been defending your FEELINGS ever since - up to and including this post.
What I said I can back up. You're pouting. You have not researched anything that you are claiming. You are operating off UNQUESTIONED NARRATIVES. I am telling you that those narratives are demonstrably false - and I am telling you again that I have numbers to prove it.
So before you try to **** anyone that I am the one operating off feelings - and before you pretend that you have offered anything RESEMBLING evidence - including whatever you mean by a purported "time line of cause and effect," at least have the decency to either
1. let it go, or
2. ask to see the proofs of my "feelings" that I offered to show you.
Heads up. It's kind of a timeline - of cause and effect. So if ya DO request it, you will find out what one of those looks like.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
3 Dec 2023 7:40 pm
Just show me your proof that Reagan was calling the shots instead of the other way around.Cannonpointer » 03 Dec 2023, 8:22 pm » wrote: ↑ Actually, you **** mouthed generalities about the media that you UTTERLY misapplied, you got corrected, you deflected, then I told you EXACTLY how the **** it was and offered PROOF, and you danced the **** that I am responding to now.
YOU are the one who puked your "feelings" about how the press treats democ rats onto the board, and I am the one who said no, that is not correct, that did NOT happen with carter - or reagan. And you have been defending your FEELINGS ever since - up to and including this post.
What I said I can back up. You're pouting. You have not researched anything that you are claiming. You are operating off UNQUESTIONED NARRATIVES. I am telling you that those narratives are demonstrably false - and I am telling you again that I have numbers to prove it.
So before you try to **** anyone that I am the one operating off feelings - and before you pretend that you have offered anything RESEMBLING evidence - including whatever you mean by a purported "time line of cause and effect," at least have the decency to either
1. let it go, or
2. ask to see the proofs of my "feelings" that I offered to show you.
Heads up. It's kind of a timeline - of cause and effect. So if ya DO request it, you will find out what one of those looks like.
Who is online
In total there are 5373 users online :: 8 registered, 13 bots, and 5352 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, ROG62, RebelGator, FJB, Beekeeper, nefarious101
Bots: NING, GPTBot, DuckDuckBot, ADmantX, CriteoBot, Mediapartners-Google, YandexBot, facebookexternalhit, Applebot, curl/7, Googlebot, proximic, bingbot