Why would I try to prove a thing I disagree with? I'm the one calling the punk by name and you're the one trying to save him from censure. The pretense that I am saying reagan was a shot caller is ****. He was an empty suit.GHETTOBLASTER » 03 Dec 2023, 8:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Just show me your proof that Reagan was calling the shots instead of the other way around.
Cannonpointer » 03 Dec 2023, 8:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Why would I try to prove a thing I disagree with? I'm the one calling the punk by name and you're the one trying to save him from censure. The pretense that I am saying reagan was a shot caller is ****. He was an empty suit.
CARTER was a **** shot caller - and they got him out after four years, and created anti-Carter narratives that affect your thinking. I've done a deep dive on Carter. You haven't. That's we're having this set-to.
Ghettoblaster's original quote..."Almost every article I've ever read about Carter's positive achievements was written or else sponsored by the [[[JWO]]]Cannonpointer » Today, 2:46 pm » wrote: ↑
Today, 2:46 pm
Carter's tenure was the high point of the American middle class. It began shrinking under reagan and never stopped...btw
1. Your links are to a dot org - not the msm.GHETTOBLASTER » 03 Dec 2023, 9:16 pm » wrote: ↑
Ghettoblaster's original quote..."Almost every article I've ever read about Carter's positive achievements was written or else sponsored by the [[[JWO]]]
https://www.counterpunch.org/2023/03/02 ... inal-then/
https://greenandredpodcast.org/2020/11/ ... inal-then/
https://greenandredpodcast.org/2023/03/ ... al-then-2/
https://afflictthecomfortable.org/2023/02/19/5549/
https://youtu.be/krp2XygLxgo?si=cZ1VnJz7bpXvV1-4
Ghettoblaster's original quote..."Almost every article I've ever read about Carter's positive achievements was written or else sponsored by the [[[JWO]]]Cannonpointer » 03 Dec 2023, 9:21 pm » wrote: ↑ 1. Your links are to a dot org - not the msm.
2. Your links are to hit pieces for him being a conservative - not love letters.
What do these links say, in YOUR view, that backs your claims or refute mine?
And you think those were positive articles? The ones calling him a neoliberal criminal, and mockingly referring to him as saint jimmy?GHETTOBLASTER » 03 Dec 2023, 9:38 pm » wrote: ↑ Ghettoblaster's original quote..."Almost every article I've ever read about Carter's positive achievements was written or else sponsored by the [[[JWO]]]
This is what I said..not what YOU said I said.
Now link to some articles that prove otherwise.
Those articles provide Carter's whole timeline of ups and downs for reference...you never haveCannonpointer » 03 Dec 2023, 9:45 pm » wrote: ↑ And you think those were positive articles? The ones calling him a neoliberal criminal, and mockingly referring to him as saint jimmy?
And you think that dotorg source is the jwo-sponsored MSM?
Seriously - you are totally confusing me here. It LOOKS like you're mad at yourself, and you're not putting up with it anymore. You're taking yourself behind the woodshed.
You mean you declined my multiple offers to do so. And no, they really don't. They mostly complain that he did not follow the democrat agenda, like reagan did. He was a conservative dixiecrat.GHETTOBLASTER » 03 Dec 2023, 9:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Those articles provide Carter's whole timeline of ups and downs for reference...you never have
Half a century out, as he approaches death, Carter is getting some sympathetic press. Okay - tour de force.GHETTOBLASTER » 03 Dec 2023, 9:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Those articles point to the fact that Carter is now portrayed as a saint in spite of his misdeeds.
Yeah, the Gipper - the Great Communicator - the biggest spender since FDR. Poor guy was horribly mistreated by the MSM. It's almost like they didn't run cover on a dozen different scandals.GHETTOBLASTER » 03 Dec 2023, 9:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Reagan doesn't get the nearly same amount of "absence makes the heart grow fonder" treatment.
Let's see...you say I declined your offer to provide Carter's timeline right after I submit Carter's timeline............Cannonpointer » 03 Dec 2023, 9:56 pm » wrote: ↑ You mean you declined my multiple offers to do so. And no, they really don't. They mostly complain that he did not follow the democrat agenda, like reagan did. He was a conservative dixiecrat.
Half a century out, as he approaches death, Carter is getting some sympathetic press. Okay - tour de force.
Yeah, the Gipper - the Great Communicator - the biggest spender since FDR. Poor guy was horribly mistreated by the MSM. It's almost like they didn't run cover on a dozen different scandals.
I'm pretty sure as he approached death, the press weren't running hit pieces. And I'm going to be honest. I think desperately using the fact that Carter is getting some sympathetic press on his damned death bed as evidence of your **** thesis is kind of slimy. It's cheap, bro.
You were wrong about Carter being given easy treatment by the media. And you're wrong about big government Reagan being treated unfairly
Give us an example.GHETTOBLASTER » 04 Dec 2023, 3:30 am » wrote: ↑ Let's see...you say I declined your offer to provide Carter's timeline right after I submit Carter's timeline............![]()
Once again I'll post what I said instead of continuing to let you comment on what you think I said....
Ghettoblaster's original quote..."Almost every article I've ever read about Carter's positive achievements was written or else sponsored by the [[[JWO]]]
Still having reading comprehension difficulties I see. Actually I think you simply refuse to admit that this is the case.Cannonpointer » 04 Dec 2023, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑ Give us an example.
I think you are lying when you pretend that hastily googled blog is just "something you read about carter." You're lying to yourself when you pretend it's friendly to him. The first headline reads, "Jimmy Carter is a liberal saint now, he was a war criminal then." The article shreds him. IT'S NOT NICE AT ALL. And right now, as he dies, is when he is getting the best press ever. That's how things work. The press of his day did everything they could to diminish him.
When you prove the MSM was overly nice to Carter by posting negative stuff from a non-MSM source, you merely convey confusion. It is evidence of nothing. It fits neither of our narratives. It doesn't help you, nor is it anything that I can turn around on you, because it isn't even in the category of JWO/MSM that we are arguing about.
Oh - and neither of us provided a timeline. That was a meaningless phrase you threw out like chaff. What I CAN show is Carter's numbers from his presidency: his spending, his cutting, his deficits, his borrowing - the jobs created on his watch. I then contrast those with reagan's numbers to show you who the liberal is. I believe you have seen it before, and that is why you declined my offer.
Are they supposed to swim?Z09 » 02 Dec 2023, 9:04 am » wrote: ↑ Anyone see the illegals coming in on boats off the coast of California?...
Thank you Democrats...
Great job Joe Biden...
Sorry - posting anti-carter, non msm articles doesn't back that silliness up. Would you like to try again?GHETTOBLASTER » 04 Dec 2023, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑Still having reading comprehension difficulties I see. Actually I think you simply refuse to admit that this is the case.Cannonpointer » 04 Dec 2023, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑ Give us an example.
I think you are lying when you pretend that hastily googled blog is just "something you read about carter." You're lying to yourself when you pretend it's friendly to him. The first headline reads, "Jimmy Carter is a liberal saint now, he was a war criminal then." The article shreds him. IT'S NOT NICE AT ALL. And right now, as he dies, is when he is getting the best press ever. That's how things work. The press of his day did everything they could to diminish him.
When you prove the MSM was overly nice to Carter by posting negative stuff from a non-MSM source, you merely convey confusion. It is evidence of nothing. It fits neither of our narratives. It doesn't help you, nor is it anything that I can turn around on you, because it isn't even in the category of JWO/MSM that we are arguing about.
Oh - and neither of us provided a timeline. That was a meaningless phrase you threw out like chaff. What I CAN show is Carter's numbers from his presidency: his spending, his cutting, his deficits, his borrowing - the jobs created on his watch. I then contrast those with reagan's numbers to show you who the liberal is. I believe you have seen it before, and that is why you declined my offer.
Ghettoblaster's original quote..."Almost every article I've ever read about Carter's positive achievements was written or else sponsored by the [[[JWO]]]
Cannonpointer » 04 Dec 2023, 11:02 am » wrote: ↑ Sorry - posting anti-carter, non msm articles doesn't back that silliness up. Would you like to try again?
GHETTOBLASTER » 04 Dec 2023, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑ Here let me help you......
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bibliogra ... mmy_Carter
Now that I've given you a stock pile of Jew author and publisher based publications to sift through I'm not surprised to see you back down.
You gave me a dot org called counter punch that raged against carter.GHETTOBLASTER » 04 Dec 2023, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑ Now that I've given you a stock pile of Jew author and publisher based publications to sift through I'm not surprised to see you back down.
Hi, I'm Greta.GHETTOBLASTER » 04 Dec 2023, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑ Now that I've given you a stock pile of Jew author and publisher based publications to sift through I'm not surprised to see you back down.
Cannonpointer » 04 Dec 2023, 11:16 am » wrote: ↑ You gave me a dot org called counter punch that raged against carter.
And somehow you thought that proved your claim that the JWO-MSM was his buddy.
I'm going to have to get someone more your speed to take it from here.
Admit this is gay, please.^GHETTOBLASTER » 04 Dec 2023, 11:41 am » wrote: ↑
Just read through that list of Jew Written and Jew Published books
Get him, tiger! Get him!GHETTOBLASTER » 04 Dec 2023, 11:41 am » wrote: ↑ Still having a problem with telling the truth I see.
Looks like I need to repost what I actually said for the 4th time now...?
Just read through that list of Jew Written and Jew Published books that I went to the trouble to furnish you.....oh wait..if you did that then you would be forcing yourself to prove that I am correct.
Nevermind.