The law was changed to state they could sit wherever they wanted too... which was the purpose of the boycott, which was successful.LincolnNebraska » 12 Dec 2023, 6:05 pm » wrote: ↑ The de jure was moot. The de facto was real. If they continued to sit in the back of the bus, then what was successful? A piece of paper?
Midol can help him.Redheaded Stranger » 06 Dec 2023, 2:42 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah, your *** is still stinging for sure.
You might need some max strength salve.
![]()
Circular reasoning 101:RedheadedStranger » 12 Dec 2023, 6:10 pm » wrote: ↑ The law was changed to state they could sit wherever they wanted too... which was the purpose of the boycott, which was successful.
It didn't mean they couldn't still choose to sit in the back if that's where they wanted to sit.
Parks got arrested for not giving up her seat to a white man, because they law at the time required her too.
The boycott meant to change that, and it did.
Sorry... you're still losing.
Keep digging if you want, but nothing you say from this point forward will change the fact that you are wrong.
..
Okay, Cannon Pointer.
Lol, right cocksucker, right. Pray tell, who will I be next week?
Up until this post you have been steadfastly saying that the boycott didn't work... and now you're saying it did.LincolnNebraska » 12 Dec 2023, 6:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Circular reasoning 101:
Did the Montgomery bus boycott achieve it's goal?
Yes, it changed court rulings and statutes.
What did that do?
It helped the boycotters achieve their goal.
By choice, nimrod.LincolnNebraska » 12 Dec 2023, 5:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Not really.
Ever been to Montgomery, Alabama? I have. Ever seen archives or footage of Montgomery in the early 1960s? I have. Do you know blacks were still mostly sitting in the back over five years after the boycott ended?
They're ***. What can we expect?LincolnNebraska » 12 Dec 2023, 5:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Do you know the demands when the boycott started? One of the demands was that black riders wanted the bus drivers to be nice to them. Now where do you hear that safe space talk today? Do you think you can legislate niceness?
The boycotters were way ahead of their time. They scrapped the bus in favor of car pools, bikes, and other supportive measures. They made uber cool decades before it was cool.
But what did they do with their new found uber and other self sufficiency? They traded it back. You got that right. They went back to the very bus system, drivers, and government that despised them.
A credit to their race - I always say that, when your ****** behave well.LincolnNebraska » 12 Dec 2023, 5:44 pm » wrote: ↑ People like Booker T Washington, Farrakhan, and Malcolm X preached self-sufficiency instead of gov enslavement. In that sense, they were great men.
I've been badmouthing that nasty old she-boon for decades.LincolnNebraska » 12 Dec 2023, 5:44 pm » wrote: ↑These self-sufficient guys, however, get short shrift when discussed by academics. Marxists like your drone bf Bippy would rather bestow accolades on MLK and others who get tied to the plantation. MLK sold out "free at last" to government handouts because the gov wanted blacks to shut up. Rosa Parks was a stupid *** tool who sold out and took the path of least resistance.
You don't even know the meaning of circular reasoning.RedheadedStranger » 12 Dec 2023, 6:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Up until this post you have been steadfastly saying that the boycott didn't work... and now you're saying it did.
What changed?
LMAO. The evaluation of success is a matter of opinion, not fact.
I smell youLincolnNebraska » 13 Dec 2023, 7:30 am » wrote: ↑ LMAO. The evaluation of success is a matter of opinion, not fact.
change your photomurdock » 12 Dec 2023, 6:16 pm » wrote: ↑ Lol, right cocksucker, right. Pray tell, who will I be next week?
Is that fact or opinion?
fact
Very good. You are 1 for 1.
FactLincolnNebraska » 13 Dec 2023, 7:34 am » wrote: ↑ Very good. You are 1 for 1.
Success of Montgomery boycott. Fact or opinion?
FactLincolnNebraska » 13 Dec 2023, 7:36 am » wrote: ↑ Incorrect. That is opinion.
Is 1 for 2 success rate good?
Apparently you do.
Bob sometimes lost in English mastery