What is there to "check"?ExogenousEllipsis » 13 Dec 2023, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah, no kidding, genius.But you asked why I changed my name. You certainly checked by now. You're glued to me like a Kim K fan.
Of course you're curious. You hang on my every action, post, and word. I'm your forum Kim K!RedheadedStranger » 13 Dec 2023, 2:49 pm » wrote: ↑ What is there to "check"?
For some reason between last night and this morning you decided to change your name from Lincoln Nebraska to ExogenousEllipsis... and I was just curious why.
I'm thinking you just a ******* that didn't realize the name wouldn't change in previously quoted replies.
![]()
People should just lay down and accept the unacceptable - that seems to be your message.ExogenousEllipsis » 13 Dec 2023, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑ Technically, yes. Practically, no.
That's the difference between de jure and de facto. At least one person getting off the bus was beaten after the boycott. There was other violence. Does this sound like the boycotters demand of niceness was met? Their other demand of black bus drivers was not really meant.
All of this goes into anyone's judgment of the boycott's success.
Hobby.
That's a horse of another color. He was much of a man, deserving of all respect.
Not hardly my message. Rosa and Co. had it right leaving the dumb buses of Montgomery. They car pooled, biked, and helped each other out. They had uber decades before uber was cool. But then they blew it when they went back to the buses, bus driver, gov, and the very people who despised them. Self sufficiency is the message, not gov bootlicking.Cannonpointer » 13 Dec 2023, 4:42 pm » wrote: ↑ People should just lay down and accept the unacceptable - that seems to be your message.
I will continue to boycott anyone who offends me.
Do
I ask about Dubois because academics often compare him with Booker T Washington. Booker preached self-reliance, and DuBois was sometimes at odds with that. Just like Malcolm X preached self reliance, and MLK sold out to the gov.Cannonpointer » 13 Dec 2023, 4:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Hobby.
Also, I know that it wasn't a spontaneous act - that she was an actor. Which is fine, unless ya try to mislead. ****** have a compulsion to fabricate and dissemble.
That's a horse of another color. He was much of a man, deserving of all respect.
He was the negro Putin.
Oh, you're a COLLEGE BOY, huh?ExogenousEllipsis » 13 Dec 2023, 4:51 pm » wrote: ↑ I ask about Dubois because academics often compare him with Booker T Washington. Booker preached self-reliance, and DuBois was sometimes at odds with that. Just like Malcolm X preached self reliance, and MLK sold out to the gov.
But agian, academics favor MLK over Malcolm X and they favor DuBois over Washington. That was my experience in school and I went much more recently than you.
Booker T. Washington was an honorable man. Its a shame that he was not the model for Blacks going forward. He accomplished a lot in his relatively short lifetime. He was married 3 times, but not due to divorce. Two of his wives died before him (or he killed them). I look back on Booker T's life, and can't help but wonder what the F- went wrong with the evolution of Backs in America? This guy set them on the right path, but at some point they strayed off of that path and went down the gutter-hole to the Devil's lair.ExogenousEllipsis » 13 Dec 2023, 4:51 pm » wrote: ↑ I ask about Dubois because academics often compare him with Booker T Washington. Booker preached self-reliance, and DuBois was sometimes at odds with that. Just like Malcolm X preached self reliance, and MLK sold out to the gov.
But agian, academics favor MLK over Malcolm X and they favor DuBois over Washington. That was my experience in school and I went much more recently than you.
Suck my dick with your mother's ***.
Suck my dick with your mother's ***.
FLAGRANT HOMOSEXUAL
Guess it depends on your perspective. I see Washington as a guy supporting self-sufficiency. He was for black business. Washington was from the south.Cannonpointer » 13 Dec 2023, 4:57 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh, you're a COLLEGE BOY, huh?
I ain't got much book learnin. I've got a lot of COMMIN SENSE.![]()
Anyway, I am surprised to learn that DuBois was preferred over Booker T. I had been under the impression that DuBois was bigger on self reliance than was Booker T. It was my understanding that Booker T. was more willing to work with the white man, and DuBois was more of a separatist/black nationalist.
I would have traced MLK back more to Booker T. and Malcom back more to the W.E.B. DuBois school of thought.
So that is NOT correct?
The difference between BTW (Booker T. Washington) and frederick Douglas was this: BTW thought that blacks should improve their lives by effort, hardwork, and doing so via agriculture and in doing so would achieve self sufficiency. Douglas was of the mind that they should do so by education and not letting past grievances go. You should hold the "offender" accountable. BTW's ways did not resonate apparently with the majority and so they moved away from the South to some degree and opted to not be involved in agriculture.Skans » 13 Dec 2023, 5:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Booker T. Washington was an honorable man. Its a shame that he was not the model for Blacks going forward. He accomplished a lot in his relatively short lifetime. He was married 3 times, but not due to divorce. Two of his wives died before him (or he killed them). I look back on Booker T's life, and can't help but wonder what the F- went wrong with the evolution of Backs in America? This guy set them on the right path, but at some point they strayed off of that path and went down the gutter-hole to the Devil's lair.
What part do you no understand? N or O?
Suck my dick with your mothers asshole.
Suck my dick with your mothers asshole.
Suck my dick with your mothers asshole.
Suck my dick with your mothers asshole.