Bud Light News - Billy Busch Jr. Sells $5M Mansion Cuz NO ONE IS BUYING BUDWEISER...

User avatar
By Skans
6 Dec 2023 7:45 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 13 14 15 16 17
User avatar
*rippy38
13 Dec 2023 1:49 pm
User avatar
CYNICAL OLD CUSS
13,058 posts
ExogenousEllipsis » 13 Dec 2023, 2:40 pm » wrote: Yeah, no kidding, genius. Image    But you asked why I changed my name.  You certainly checked by now.  You're glued to me like a Kim K fan.
What is there to "check"?

For some reason between last night and this morning you decided to change your name from Lincoln Nebraska to ExogenousEllipsis... and I was just curious why.

I'm thinking you just a ******* that didn't realize the name wouldn't change in previously quoted replies.

:rofl:  
​​​
 
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
User avatar
Imperial Wizard
13 Dec 2023 1:51 pm
User avatar
BUTT HURT AND SQUAWLING
2,422 posts
RedheadedStranger » 13 Dec 2023, 2:49 pm » wrote: What is there to "check"?

For some reason between last night and this morning you decided to change your name from Lincoln Nebraska to ExogenousEllipsis... and I was just curious why.

I'm thinking you just a ******* that didn't realize the name wouldn't change in previously quoted replies.

Image  
​​​
Of course you're curious.  You hang on my every action, post, and word.  I'm your forum Kim K!
 
User avatar
Cannonpointer
13 Dec 2023 3:42 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
46,731 posts
ExogenousEllipsis » 13 Dec 2023, 9:49 am » wrote: Technically, yes.  Practically, no.

That's the difference between de jure and de facto.  At least one person getting off the bus was beaten after the boycott.  There was other violence.  Does this sound like the boycotters demand of niceness was met?  Their other demand of black bus drivers was not really meant.

All of this goes into anyone's judgment of the boycott's success.
People should just lay down and accept the unacceptable - that seems to be your message.

I will continue to boycott anyone who offends me. :)
 
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Cannonpointer
13 Dec 2023 3:46 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
46,731 posts
ExogenousEllipsis » 13 Dec 2023, 9:50 am » wrote: Why do you badmouth Rosa Parks?
Hobby.

Also, I know that it wasn't a spontaneous act - that she was an actor. Which is fine, unless ya try to mislead. ****** have a compulsion to fabricate and dissemble.
ExogenousEllipsis » 13 Dec 2023, 9:50 am » wrote: What is your opinion of WEB DuBois?
That's a horse of another color. He was much of a man, deserving of all respect.

He was the negro Putin.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Imperial Wizard
13 Dec 2023 3:48 pm
User avatar
BUTT HURT AND SQUAWLING
2,422 posts
Cannonpointer » 13 Dec 2023, 4:42 pm » wrote: People should just lay down and accept the unacceptable - that seems to be your message.

I will continue to boycott anyone who offends me. Image
Not hardly my message.  Rosa and Co. had it right leaving the dumb buses of Montgomery.  They car pooled, biked, and helped each other out.  They had uber decades before uber was cool.  But then they blew it when they went back to the buses, bus driver, gov, and the very people who despised them.  Self sufficiency is the message, not gov bootlicking.  
User avatar
murdock
13 Dec 2023 3:50 pm
User avatar
FLAGRANT HOMOSEXUAL, CHILD DANGER
6,452 posts
SOCK SAVINGS » 13 Dec 2023, 1:23 pm » wrote: change your photo fatso

Bob
 
Do

Suck my dick with your mom's ***

Loop until cum blows out her ears.
He's dead Jim!
User avatar
Imperial Wizard
13 Dec 2023 3:51 pm
User avatar
BUTT HURT AND SQUAWLING
2,422 posts
Cannonpointer » 13 Dec 2023, 4:46 pm » wrote: Hobby.

Also, I know that it wasn't a spontaneous act - that she was an actor. Which is fine, unless ya try to mislead. ****** have a compulsion to fabricate and dissemble.

That's a horse of another color. He was much of a man, deserving of all respect.

He was the negro Putin.
I ask about Dubois because academics often compare him with Booker T Washington.  Booker preached self-reliance, and DuBois was sometimes at odds with that.  Just like Malcolm X preached self reliance, and MLK sold out to the gov.  

But agian, academics favor MLK over Malcolm X and they favor DuBois over Washington.  That was my experience in school and I went much more recently than you.  
 
User avatar
Cannonpointer
13 Dec 2023 3:57 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
46,731 posts
ExogenousEllipsis » 13 Dec 2023, 4:51 pm » wrote: I ask about Dubois because academics often compare him with Booker T Washington.  Booker preached self-reliance, and DuBois was sometimes at odds with that.  Just like Malcolm X preached self reliance, and MLK sold out to the gov.  

But agian, academics favor MLK over Malcolm X and they favor DuBois over Washington.  That was my experience in school and I went much more recently than you.
Oh, you're a COLLEGE BOY, huh?

I ain't got much book learnin. I've got a lot of COMMIN SENSE. :)  

Anyway, I am surprised to learn that DuBois was preferred over Booker T. I had been under the impression that DuBois was bigger on self reliance than was Booker T. It was my understanding that Booker T. was more willing to work with the white man, and DuBois was more of a separatist/black nationalist.

I would have traced MLK back more to Booker T. and Malcom back more to the W.E.B. DuBois school of thought.

So that is NOT correct?
 
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Skans
13 Dec 2023 4:04 pm
User avatar
      
15,413 posts
ExogenousEllipsis » 13 Dec 2023, 4:51 pm » wrote: I ask about Dubois because academics often compare him with Booker T Washington.  Booker preached self-reliance, and DuBois was sometimes at odds with that.  Just like Malcolm X preached self reliance, and MLK sold out to the gov.  

But agian, academics favor MLK over Malcolm X and they favor DuBois over Washington.  That was my experience in school and I went much more recently than you.
Booker T. Washington was an honorable man.  Its a shame that he was not the model for Blacks going forward. He accomplished a lot in his relatively short lifetime.  He was married 3 times, but not due to divorce.  Two of his wives died before him (or he killed them).  I look back on Booker T's life, and can't help but wonder what the F- went wrong with the evolution of Backs in America?  This guy set them on the right path, but at some point they strayed off of that path and went down the gutter-hole to the Devil's lair.
 
User avatar
murdock
13 Dec 2023 4:22 pm
User avatar
FLAGRANT HOMOSEXUAL, CHILD DANGER
6,453 posts
SOCK SAVINGS » 13 Dec 2023, 1:23 pm » wrote: change your photo fatso

Bob
 
Suck my dick with your mother's ***.
He's dead Jim!
User avatar
murdock
13 Dec 2023 4:22 pm
User avatar
FLAGRANT HOMOSEXUAL, CHILD DANGER
6,453 posts
SOCK SAVINGS » 13 Dec 2023, 7:32 am » wrote: change your photo

Bob
 
Suck my dick with your mother's ***.
He's dead Jim!
User avatar
*SOCK SAVINGS
13 Dec 2023 5:20 pm
User avatar
FORUM BANKER
1,019 posts
murdock » 13 Dec 2023, 5:22 pm » wrote: Suck my dick with your mother's ***.
FLAGRANT HOMOSEXUAL
Change your photo

Bob
 
User avatar
Imperial Wizard
13 Dec 2023 5:35 pm
User avatar
BUTT HURT AND SQUAWLING
2,422 posts
Cannonpointer » 13 Dec 2023, 4:57 pm » wrote: Oh, you're a COLLEGE BOY, huh?

I ain't got much book learnin. I've got a lot of COMMIN SENSE. Image  

Anyway, I am surprised to learn that DuBois was preferred over Booker T. I had been under the impression that DuBois was bigger on self reliance than was Booker T. It was my understanding that Booker T. was more willing to work with the white man, and DuBois was more of a separatist/black nationalist.

I would have traced MLK back more to Booker T. and Malcom back more to the W.E.B. DuBois school of thought.

So that is NOT correct?
Guess it depends on your perspective.  I see Washington as a guy supporting self-sufficiency.  He was for black business.  Washington was from the south.

DuBois was from the north.  I see him as emphasizing politics rather than blacks being merchants.

That's a simplistic view and there's lots of complexities,  but this really mirrors what is happening today and with Rosa Parks, MLK, Malcolm X, etc.  MLK and Parks sought political change.  Malcolm X didn't trust white devils and thought--to a certain extent--that blacks did better in their own community.

Look how it applies to the Mont. bus boycott.  Parks and her group were seeking political change.  She ended up going back to the bus and the very bus system and government that despised her and her group.  Look at what happened during the boycott.  Blacks formed car pools, biked, and supported each other.  Again, a modern day Uber.  I think Washington would have been proud of those people.  Du Bois would have rejected that.

Read academics' view of Washington.  They generally disparage him and tout Du Bois.  Malcolm is disparaged (or ignored) while MLK is lionized.  Now, look at blacks who strike out on their own and tell marxists to stick it.  They're off the plantation, according to libs.  Libs want to emphasize that political change nonsense and act like blacks supporting one another in their own communities is somehow sucking up to the white man. 
 
User avatar
some leftist homo
13 Dec 2023 5:37 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
1,348 posts
Skans » 13 Dec 2023, 5:04 pm » wrote: Booker T. Washington was an honorable man.  Its a shame that he was not the model for Blacks going forward. He accomplished a lot in his relatively short lifetime.  He was married 3 times, but not due to divorce.  Two of his wives died before him (or he killed them).  I look back on Booker T's life, and can't help but wonder what the F- went wrong with the evolution of Backs in America?  This guy set them on the right path, but at some point they strayed off of that path and went down the gutter-hole to the Devil's lair.
The difference between BTW (Booker T. Washington) and frederick Douglas was this: BTW thought that blacks should improve their lives by effort, hardwork, and doing so via agriculture and in doing so would achieve self sufficiency.  Douglas was of the mind that they should do so by education and not letting past grievances go. You should hold the "offender" accountable. BTW's ways did not resonate apparently with the majority and so they moved away from the South to some degree and opted to not be involved in agriculture. 
 
User avatar
murdock
13 Dec 2023 5:47 pm
User avatar
FLAGRANT HOMOSEXUAL, CHILD DANGER
6,453 posts
SOCK SAVINGS » 13 Dec 2023, 6:20 pm » wrote: FLAGRANT HOMOSEXUAL
Change your photo

Bob
 

 Suck my dick with your mother's asshole.
He's dead Jim!
User avatar
*SOCK SAVINGS
13 Dec 2023 6:01 pm
User avatar
FORUM BANKER
1,019 posts
murdock » 13 Dec 2023, 6:47 pm » wrote:  Suck my dick with your mother's asshole.
What part do you no understand?  N or O?

Bob





 
 
User avatar
murdock
13 Dec 2023 6:31 pm
User avatar
FLAGRANT HOMOSEXUAL, CHILD DANGER
6,453 posts
SOCK SAVINGS » 13 Dec 2023, 6:20 pm » wrote: FLAGRANT HOMOSEXUAL
Change your photo

Bob
 
Suck my dick with your mothers asshole.
He's dead Jim!
User avatar
murdock
13 Dec 2023 6:32 pm
User avatar
FLAGRANT HOMOSEXUAL, CHILD DANGER
6,453 posts
SOCK SAVINGS » 13 Dec 2023, 1:23 pm » wrote: change your photo fatso

Bob
 
Suck my dick with your mothers asshole.
He's dead Jim!
User avatar
murdock
13 Dec 2023 6:32 pm
User avatar
FLAGRANT HOMOSEXUAL, CHILD DANGER
6,453 posts
SOCK SAVINGS » 13 Dec 2023, 1:23 pm » wrote: change your photo fatso

Bob
 
Suck my dick with your mothers asshole.
He's dead Jim!
User avatar
murdock
13 Dec 2023 6:33 pm
User avatar
FLAGRANT HOMOSEXUAL, CHILD DANGER
6,453 posts
SOCK SAVINGS » 13 Dec 2023, 7:32 am » wrote: change your photo

Bob
 
Suck my dick with your mothers asshole.
He's dead Jim!
1 13 14 15 16 17

Who is online

In total there are 5116 users online :: 2 registered, 12 bots, and 5102 guests
Registered users: LowIQTrash, SouthernFried
Bots: LCC, MicroMessenger, YandexBot, GPTBot, DuckDuckBot, CriteoBot, curl/7, Mediapartners-Google, bingbot, Applebot, Googlebot, facebookexternalhit
Updated 1 minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search