I think the most I ever paid to watch an act was $60 - and I believe that was to see Dick Dale. I liked to see more obscure bands. Even some '90's swing bands - some were really great. This band, Man or Astroman was a good show. Genre is surf-punk.impartialobserver » 07 Dec 2023, 4:30 pm » wrote: ↑ however, to get back to the point.. there is a limit to how much I will spend. Taylor Swift's concert tickets average at about $1000. Way too rich for my blood. Most that I ever paid was $190 but that was to see a band that had not toured in 12 years and may never do it again. This was why I went to NYC. Typically, it needs to be between $40 and $80 and not demand more than a few hours drive. Typically, dovetail it with something else such as camping, climbing a peak, or so.

Skans » 07 Dec 2023, 4:36 pm » wrote: ↑ I think the most I ever paid to watch an act was $60 - and I believe that was to see Dick Dale. I liked to see more obscure bands. Even some '90's swing bands - some were really great. This band, Man or Astroman was a good show. Genre is surf-punk.
Some Bands made the bulk of their money off of Touring ---- The Grateful Dead & KISS are great examples... Others such as Pink Floyd rarely if ever turned a profit from Tours... They made it from Album Sales Merch, Radio Plays and Publishing...impartialobserver » 07 Dec 2023, 2:51 pm » wrote: ↑ CD's changed it but the real game changer was the Internet, Napster, and streaming. Most artists do not make any substantial revenues via streaming. As to why Taylor Swift succeeds on that front.. it is a bit too involved for a discussion forum like this. Just know that she herself (not management, not record executives) is at the root of her amazing success in the streaming arena.
another aspect to the touring game that makes it expensive is that the not-so-savvy artists get screwed on merchandise sales. Venues take a cut where they used to not.
Brian Stelter of the Stray Cats used to tour with his own Big Swing Band production.... I caught one of his shows, it was a blast... The whole joint was up dancing & grooving...Skans » 07 Dec 2023, 4:36 pm » wrote: ↑ I think the most I ever paid to watch an act was $60 - and I believe that was to see Dick Dale. I liked to see more obscure bands. Even some '90's swing bands - some were really great. This band, Man or Astroman was a good show. Genre is surf-punk.
Punch » 07 Dec 2023, 1:53 am » wrote: ↑
The Right is saying this country girl is being weaponized against them.
I like her.
Taylor Swift's ‘Time' Cover Is Breaking Far-Right Brains (msn.com)
Time magazine declared Taylor Swift as 2023's person of the year on Wednesday, and accompanied the announcement with a rare interview from the artist in which she reflected on the year of her career that truly put her on top of the world. Unsurprisingly, right-wing commentators took the opportunity to interpret Swift's well-earned success to launch into a conspiracy theory bender.Swift, who has publicly aligned herself with the pro-choice movement and declared her opposition to former President Donald Trump, has become the ire of a vocal group of conservatives hell-bent on the bizarre notion that the singer is a political weapon aimed at the upcoming presidential election. End of Wokeness, a far-right account with nearly 2 million followers, credited Swift with having enough rizz to convince a "cult-like following" to "drink poisoned Kool Aid for her." In the same post, the account prophesied that the singer-songwriter's next step would be "Politics," adding, "If you don't think the regime has plans to weaponize her just in time for 2024, you clearly have not been paying attention."Echoing the far-right fear-mongering, former Trump immigration adviser Stephen Miller tweeted, "What's happening with Taylor Swift is not organic."

JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Welcome to the psyop.Punch » 07 Dec 2023, 1:53 am » wrote: ↑
The Right is saying this country girl is being weaponized against them.
I like her.
Taylor Swift's ‘Time' Cover Is Breaking Far-Right Brains (msn.com)
Time magazine declared Taylor Swift as 2023's person of the year on Wednesday, and accompanied the announcement with a rare interview from the artist in which she reflected on the year of her career that truly put her on top of the world. Unsurprisingly, right-wing commentators took the opportunity to interpret Swift's well-earned success to launch into a conspiracy theory bender.Swift, who has publicly aligned herself with the pro-choice movement and declared her opposition to former President Donald Trump, has become the ire of a vocal group of conservatives hell-bent on the bizarre notion that the singer is a political weapon aimed at the upcoming presidential election. End of Wokeness, a far-right account with nearly 2 million followers, credited Swift with having enough rizz to convince a "cult-like following" to "drink poisoned Kool Aid for her." In the same post, the account prophesied that the singer-songwriter's next step would be "Politics," adding, "If you don't think the regime has plans to weaponize her just in time for 2024, you clearly have not been paying attention."Echoing the far-right fear-mongering, former Trump immigration adviser Stephen Miller tweeted, "What's happening with Taylor Swift is not organic."
why? How did they become so apathetic to natural evolving? Hope, faith, charity, power, wealth, fame from pretending now isn't eternity.
impartialobserver » 07 Dec 2023, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Have fun at the show. Have recently been checking off boxes on the concert bucket list and been having a great time
Isn't Keith Richards' hands crippled by arthritis, so when going to see 70+ year olds trying to recapture their youth like watching a Rocky VIII movie.Imgreatagain » 08 Dec 2023, 6:57 am » wrote: ↑ which shows? I’ve seen Depeche Mode and Taylor swift this year. The stones next year
Stray Cats - I used to like that band!Kobia2 » 07 Dec 2023, 6:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Brian Stelter of the Stray Cats used to tour with his own Big Swing Band production.... I caught one of his shows, it was a blast... The whole joint was up dancing & grooving...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGhwVUUO-Dk
So she's just another leftist moron. Dime a dozen.Punch » 07 Dec 2023, 1:53 am » wrote: ↑
The Right is saying this country girl is being weaponized against them.
I like her.
Taylor Swift's ‘Time' Cover Is Breaking Far-Right Brains (msn.com)
Time magazine declared Taylor Swift as 2023's person of the year on Wednesday, and accompanied the announcement with a rare interview from the artist in which she reflected on the year of her career that truly put her on top of the world. Unsurprisingly, right-wing commentators took the opportunity to interpret Swift's well-earned success to launch into a conspiracy theory bender.Swift, who has publicly aligned herself with the pro-choice movement and declared her opposition to former President Donald Trump, has become the ire of a vocal group of conservatives hell-bent on the bizarre notion that the singer is a political weapon aimed at the upcoming presidential election. End of Wokeness, a far-right account with nearly 2 million followers, credited Swift with having enough rizz to convince a "cult-like following" to "drink poisoned Kool Aid for her." In the same post, the account prophesied that the singer-songwriter's next step would be "Politics," adding, "If you don't think the regime has plans to weaponize her just in time for 2024, you clearly have not been paying attention."Echoing the far-right fear-mongering, former Trump immigration adviser Stephen Miller tweeted, "What's happening with Taylor Swift is not organic."
Imgreatagain » 08 Dec 2023, 6:57 am » wrote: ↑ which shows? I’ve seen Depeche Mode and Taylor swift this year. The stones next year
Punch » 07 Dec 2023, 1:53 am » wrote: ↑
The Right is saying this country girl is being weaponized against them.
I like her.
Taylor Swift's ‘Time' Cover Is Breaking Far-Right Brains (msn.com)
Time magazine declared Taylor Swift as 2023's person of the year on Wednesday, and accompanied the announcement with a rare interview from the artist in which she reflected on the year of her career that truly put her on top of the world. Unsurprisingly, right-wing commentators took the opportunity to interpret Swift's well-earned success to launch into a conspiracy theory bender.Swift, who has publicly aligned herself with the pro-choice movement and declared her opposition to former President Donald Trump, has become the ire of a vocal group of conservatives hell-bent on the bizarre notion that the singer is a political weapon aimed at the upcoming presidential election. End of Wokeness, a far-right account with nearly 2 million followers, credited Swift with having enough rizz to convince a "cult-like following" to "drink poisoned Kool Aid for her." In the same post, the account prophesied that the singer-songwriter's next step would be "Politics," adding, "If you don't think the regime has plans to weaponize her just in time for 2024, you clearly have not been paying attention."Echoing the far-right fear-mongering, former Trump immigration adviser Stephen Miller tweeted, "What's happening with Taylor Swift is not organic."
I remember seeing on you tube- her melting down over conservatives.... Crying- that was the day- I lost all respect for her? another Robert DeNiro?jerrab » 08 Dec 2023, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑ that really really is not the best picture of swift. I have seen better pictures of her at the games.
You don't see she is trying to look like someone from the 40's or 50's on the front cover. She is impersonating the Susan Hayward type look.jerra b » 08 Dec 2023, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑ that really really is not the best picture of swift. I have seen better pictures of her at the games.
When she was young- angel- she trailed Bob Hope? He groomed her! look him up.Nostradamus'omh » 08 Dec 2023, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑ You don't see she is trying to look like someone from the 40's or 50's on the front cover. She is impersonating the Susan Hayward type look.
why? I was just saying the look she created for that photo on the cover was looking like. Everyone says she is smart so when she was told she would be on the cover, she wanted to appeal to the older generations this time.sooted up Cyndi » 08 Dec 2023, 2:05 pm » wrote: ↑ When she was young- angel- she trailed Bob Hope? He groomed her! look him up. :lol: