Liberal Forum

murdock » 12 Dec 2023, 3:24 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Dec 2023, 3:24 pm

Who is that you are with?

You KNOW it can't be me....

I have enviable T levels....

R.Suave » 12 Dec 2023, 3:01 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Dec 2023, 3:01 pm

How many families, how many designs....

NO QUESTIONS DICK SUCKER!
 

RedheadedStranger » 12 Dec 2023, 3:41 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Dec 2023, 3:41 pm

I see you still have nothing.

When you rebleat TinyThings, you are staring nothing in its reeking brown eye....

R.Suave » 12 Dec 2023, 3:41 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Dec 2023, 3:41 pm

You KNOW it can't be me....

I have enviable T levels....

T for tranny, I'm sure - ya gender confused simp.
 

R.Suave » 12 Dec 2023, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Dec 2023, 3:42 pm

When you rebleat TinyThings, you are staring nothing in its reeking brown eye....

I would have liked to record your post-to-questions/demands ratio just on this thread alone. However, we are like 36 pages in or something like that. I'll wait to expose your cowardice on another thread. 

R.Suave » 12 Dec 2023, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Dec 2023, 2:58 pm

**** unbelievable.

You said I started this thread.  And the link you provided in the post leads back to a post on this thread.

@Vegas  this ******* thinks I started this thread and won't man up and admit he was wrong.

R.Suave » 12 Dec 2023, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Dec 2023, 3:42 pm

When you rebleat TinyThings, you are staring nothing in its reeking brown eye....

If I remember right, you argument about that AR-15 was that is shouldn't be in civilian hands because it was designed as a "weapon of war"... correct?

What about these?


  
 They were designed as "weapons of war" as well.


​​​​​​
 

R.Suave » 12 Dec 2023, 3:01 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Dec 2023, 3:01 pm

Too stupid to be fed.

the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design

How many families, how many designs....

Any designs.  If you wish I will bump the threads that explains it to you.  No need to do it on any thread you desire.

Huey » 12 Dec 2023, 3:44 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Dec 2023, 3:44 pm

You said I started this thread.  And the link you provided in the post leads back to a post on this thread.

@Vegas  this ******* thinks I started this thread and won't man up and admit he was wrong.

He's as full of **** as he ever was for sure.

Lol
 

Huey » 12 Dec 2023, 3:44 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Dec 2023, 3:44 pm

You said I started this thread.  And the link you provided in the post leads back to a post on this thread.

@Vegas  this ******* thinks I started this thread and won't man up and admit he was wrong.

Did you expect him to? Cowards will be cowards. 
 

RedheadedStranger » 12 Dec 2023, 3:44 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Dec 2023, 3:44 pm

If I remember right, you argument about that AR-15 was that is shouldn't be in civilian hands because it was designed as a "weapon of war"... correct?

What about these?


  
 They were designed as "weapons of war" as well.


​​​​​​

He is too hard headed to admit he is wrong.  I told him if he wishes to discuss this I will be more than happy to bump one of the old threads.  They still show up in profile under the threads I started.

RedheadedStranger » 12 Dec 2023, 3:45 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Dec 2023, 3:45 pm

He's as full of **** as he ever was for sure.

Lol

He never changes.  He is here just to troll.

RedheadedStranger » 12 Dec 2023, 3:44 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Dec 2023, 3:44 pm

If I remember right, you argument about that AR-15 was that is shouldn't be in civilian hands because it was designed as a "weapon of war"... correct?

What about these?


  
 They were designed as "weapons of war" as well.


​​​​​​

You ask that as if you think I care what ammosexuals tell themselves when confronted with facts.

R.Suave » 12 Dec 2023, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Dec 2023, 3:54 pm

You ask that as if you think I care what ammosexuals tell themselves when confronted with facts.

I don't care what you think... I'm just pointing out how ridiculous your original argument was in the first place.

 
 

R.Suave » 12 Dec 2023, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Dec 2023, 3:54 pm

You ask that as if you think I care what ammosexuals tell themselves when confronted with facts.

He just confronted you with facts.  Using your failed argument those weapons need to go.

I am going to bump one of those old threads.  I am not reposting all of it for you.

R.Suave » 12 Dec 2023, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Dec 2023, 3:54 pm

You ask that as if you think I care what ammosexuals tell themselves when confronted with facts.

You gave no facts. The only fact that you ever gave is that you are a child groomer and sexual predator. 

Huey » 12 Dec 2023, 3:56 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Dec 2023, 3:56 pm

He just confronted you with facts.  Using your failed argument those weapons need to go.

I am going to bump one of those old threads.  I am not reposting all of it for you.

There is no need, because there is no argument.

One family, one design.

 I am not reposting all of it for you.

You're going to cherry pick..

Of course....

 

R.Suave » 12 Dec 2023, 3:59 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Dec 2023, 3:59 pm

There is no need, because there is no argument.

One family, one design.

You're going to cherry pick..

Of course....

You may address this topic with me on the thread I just bumped.  

As far as cherry picking goes, the link you provide show multiple designs.

Eat those cherries, gunophobe

R. Suave » 12 Dec 2023, 3:41 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Dec 2023, 3:41 pm

You KNOW it can't be me....

I have enviable T levels....

You're a floating pile.

murdock » 12 Dec 2023, 4:06 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Dec 2023, 4:06 pm

You're a floating pile.

No...a strapping mansicle.