Liberal Forum

Bidencrimefamily » 01 Jan 2024, 5:19 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jan 2024, 5:19 pm

Yeah I heard the wrestlers said there is no way he didn't  know about the pedo stuff going on.

Sure...but now he's woke.

R.Suave » 01 Jan 2024, 5:24 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jan 2024, 5:24 pm

Sure...but now he's woke.

The wrestlers say he covered for the pedo. 

R.Suave » 01 Jan 2024, 5:22 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jan 2024, 5:22 pm

So **** stupid I despair for the Human Condition.

Read what is written.  The discussion is about violent crime increasing.  Not suicide.  Thanks for you input, troll.

R.Suave » 01 Jan 2024, 5:23 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jan 2024, 5:23 pm

I'm sure there's a rule.

Yes, you have rules for everything.
 
 

Huey » 01 Jan 2024, 5:29 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jan 2024, 5:29 pm

Read what is written.  The discussion is about violent crime increasing.  Not suicide.  Thanks for you input, troll.

THE YELLOW LINE, YOU BRAINLESS ****.

Geebus.

**** moron.
 
 

R.Suave » 01 Jan 2024, 5:35 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jan 2024, 5:35 pm

THE YELLOW LINE, YOU BRAINLESS ****.

Geebus.

**** moron.

You loons keep touting the decrease in violent crime although some of us have pointed out it is not below pre covid levels yet.  You may shut up now, troll.

Huey » 01 Jan 2024, 6:12 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jan 2024, 6:12 pm

You loons keep touting the decrease in violent crime although some of us have pointed out it is not below pre covid levels yet.  You may shut up now, troll.

No.

Stop speaking for non-ammosexuals.

What year set the record for firearms related murders?

First time.


 

R.Suave » 01 Jan 2024, 6:19 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jan 2024, 6:19 pm

No.

Stop speaking for non-ammosexuals.

What year set the record for firearms related murders?

First time.

You can post it.  And make your case.  I stand by what I have posted to this point.

 

Bidencrimefamily » 01 Jan 2024, 5:25 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jan 2024, 5:25 pm

The wrestlers say he covered for the pedo.

The wrestlers? You mean the 22-year-old consenting homosexuals     

Huey » 01 Jan 2024, 6:32 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jan 2024, 6:32 pm

You can post it.  And make your case.  I stand by what I have posted to this point.

No...

You can acknowledge it. It is a fact.

And make your case

I have done so repeatedly..

You have very strict rules about repeating.

I stand by what I have posted to this point.

Of course you do....you're an unapologetic *******...


 

Warcok » 01 Jan 2024, 6:33 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jan 2024, 6:33 pm

The wrestlers? You mean the 22-year-old consenting homosexuals   

Why do your victims always "consent"?

Huey » 01 Jan 2024, 6:12 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jan 2024, 6:12 pm

You loons keep touting the decrease in violent crime although some of us have pointed out it is not below pre covid levels yet.  You may shut up now, troll.

although some of us have pointed out it is not below pre covid levels yet

3.5!

 

R.Suave » 01 Jan 2024, 6:40 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jan 2024, 6:40 pm

No...

You can acknowledge it. It is a fact.

I have done so repeatedly..

You have very strict rules about repeating.

Of course you do....you're an unapologetic *******...

Waiting on your case.

Remember, in the last 3-4 years home gun ownership has reached historic levels and gun sales have also.  Yet, with all these gun owners out there post covid violent crime figures are decreasing.

So the dem talking point is false.  As the number show.  My stand is More firearms bought by law abiding citizens does not equate to higher violent crime numbers.

Make your case it isn't.  And take your stand.

R.Suave » 01 Jan 2024, 6:42 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jan 2024, 6:42 pm

3.5!

Don't really remember what 3.5 is in reference to.  And I guarangodamntee most here don't either.  It appears you have some sort of perceived victory in that empty head of yours.

Huey » 01 Jan 2024, 7:00 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jan 2024, 7:00 pm

Don't really remember what 3.5 is in reference to.  And I guarangodamntee most here don't either.  It appears you have some sort of perceived victory in that empty head of yours.

Naturally....

Huey » 01 Jan 2024, 6:59 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jan 2024, 6:59 pm

Waiting on your case.

Remember, in the last 3-4 years home gun ownership has reached historic levels and gun sales have also.  Yet, with all these gun owners out there post covid violent crime figures are decreasing.

So the dem talking point is false.  As the number show. My stand is More firearms bought by law abiding citizens does not equate to higher violent crime numbers.

Make your case it isn't.  And take your stand.

People are buying guns in the false belief, promoted by your primary source, that violent crime is rising.

But what is actually rising are the predictable pathologies associated with increased number of guns in homes.

As shown by the data.
 

R.Suave » 01 Jan 2024, 8:39 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jan 2024, 8:39 pm

People are buying guns in the false belief, promoted by your primary source, that violent crime is rising.

But what is actually rising are the predictable pathologies associated with increased number of guns in homes.

As shown by the data.

I own firearms because I enjoy shooting above anything else.

I would say half or more of the pieces I own are made specifically for target or small game shooting. The lowly .22lr is probably my favorite cartridge to shoot overall, with the .38/.357 running a close second.

 

R.Suave » 01 Jan 2024, 6:41 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jan 2024, 6:41 pm

Why do your victims always "consent"?

Because that's the only way you can "molest" a grown man who's a professional wrestler is if they consent.  

Are you telling me that grown men in their prime who are professional wrestlers were "molested" against their will by a 70 year old wrestling coach?         



 
 

Huey » 01 Jan 2024, 5:29 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jan 2024, 5:29 pm

Read what is written.  The discussion is about violent crime increasing.  Not suicide.  Thanks for you input, troll.

Suicides are OK in my book.
Especially when they involve Libtards with  no other life  than this forum.     
 
 

Warcok » 01 Jan 2024, 10:36 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Jan 2024, 10:36 pm

Because that's the only way you can "molest" a grown man who's a professional wrestler is if they consent.  

Are you telling me that grown men in their prime who are professional wrestlers were "molested" against their will by a 70 year old wrestling coach?       

Not unless you do it under color of your position as team physician.