Liberal Forum

R.Suave » 02 Jan 2024, 8:36 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2024, 8:36 am

"******!"


Thank you, Tiny....very good.....here's a biscuit.

 

No, numbers.  I said nothing of race.  You go ahead and run from the numbers.  And cry racism.  Even you vaunted CNN breaks it down by race. Are you complainiing to them?

Huey » 02 Jan 2024, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2024, 8:23 am

Cherry picking?  We go from destroying your argument on overall firearm homicides decreasing in general to you CHERRY PICKING a sub set.  I accept your surrender.

 

"Subset"...."cherry picking"

 

.This is the first time the national firearm homicide rate has fallen since a sharp increase was recorded from 2019 to 2020, amid the Covid-19 pandemic, according to the CDC.Between 2019 and 2020, the overall firearm homicide rate increased by about 35%, from 4.4 deaths per 100,000 people nationwide in 2019 to 5.8 in 2020. That rate was the highest it had been relative to the previous 20 years, only to increase again in 2021 to 6.3 deaths per 100,000 people.


 

R.Suave » 02 Jan 2024, 8:09 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2024, 8:09 am

Stop the tiny cherry picking. ******* bitch.

Gun homicides and suicides in US children and teens are at a record high

https://www.cnn.com/2023/10/02/us/gun-h ... index.html

From your link:

Black children more likely to die by firearms than kids of other races

Seventeen out of every 100,000 Black children and teens died by gunfire in 2021. That's nearly six times the rate that White children died.

Is your primary source racist?
 
 

R.Suave » 02 Jan 2024, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2024, 8:40 am

 

"Subset"...."cherry picking"

 

.This is the first time the national firearm homicide rate has fallen since a sharp increase was recorded from 2019 to 2020, amid the Covid-19 pandemic, according to the CDC.Between 2019 and 2020, the overall firearm homicide rate increased by about 35%, from 4.4 deaths per 100,000 people nationwide in 2019 to 5.8 in 2020. That rate was the highest it had been relative to the previous 20 years, only to increase again in 2021 to 6.3 deaths per 100,000 people.


 

 

And yet it dropped. 

Huey » 02 Jan 2024, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2024, 8:42 am

And yet it dropped.

You're a **** idiot...


We've seen a PRECIPITOUS rise in firearms related homicides, concurrent with an increase in gun sales and a drop in the overall violent crime rate.


 

Huey » 02 Jan 2024, 8:06 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2024, 8:06 am

ANd more:After years of increases, the rate of firearm-related homicides in the United States decreased in 2022, according to data published Thursday by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.This is the first time the national firearm homicide rate has fallen since a sharp increase was recorded from 2019 to 2020, amid the Covid-19 pandemic, according to the CDC.Between 2019 and 2020, the overall firearm homicide rate increased by about 35%, from 4.4 deaths per 100,000 people nationwide in 2019 to 5.8 in 2020. That rate was the highest it had been relative to the previous 20 years, only to increase again in 2021 to 6.3 deaths per 100,000 people.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/10/20/health/f ... index.html

From your primary source.  You may go now. 

 

@R. Suave  

Try that again.

NOte, it is your primary source.   Argue with them.  
 

Huey » 02 Jan 2024, 8:51 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2024, 8:51 am

@R. Suave  

Try that again.

NOte, it is your primary source.   Argue with them.

I see and understand the bolded text.


What cherry picking point are you trying to make?

 

R.Suave » 02 Jan 2024, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2024, 8:54 am

I see and understand the bolded text.


What cherry picking point are you trying to make?

 

 

You went all bat **** crazy when I posted the 4 democrat controlled cities with strict gun laws that show child/teen firearm death rates have doubled.  You  implied I was being racist.

Yet your primary source points out the high rate for black kids.  

I already won the overall point and now addressing your reframe. 
 

Huey » 02 Jan 2024, 8:57 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2024, 8:57 am

You went all bat **** crazy when I posted the 4 democrat controlled cities with strict gun laws that show child/teen firearm death rates have doubled.  You  implied I was being racist.

Yet your primary source points out the high rate for black kids.  

I already won the overall point and now addressing your reframe.

Post this "crazy".

In my words.
 

R.Suave » 02 Jan 2024, 9:04 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2024, 9:04 am

Post this "crazy".

In my words.
 

 

You can read.  It seems we are done with this discussion.

1.  Violent crime is down.  To include homicide.

2.  While homicide by firearms is above pre pandemic levels it is down in 2022.

3.  Child homicide by firearm is up and is driven by the 4 cities mentioned above.

IF you have anything concerning those 4 concise bullet points let me know.  I am not interested in your whiny reframes and diversions. 
 

Huey » 02 Jan 2024, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2024, 9:06 am

You can read.  It seems we are done with this discussion.

1.  Violent crime is down.  To include homicide.

2.  While homicide by firearms is above pre pandemic levels it is down in 2022.

3.  Child homicide by firearm is up and is driven by the 4 cities mentioned above.

IF you have anything concerning those 4 concise bullet points let me know.  I am not interested in your whiny reframes and diversions.

Which of those words are mine?

How can that POSSIBLY satisfy the request?


 

R.Suave » 02 Jan 2024, 8:47 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2024, 8:47 am

You're a **** idiot...

We've seen a PRECIPITOUS rise in firearms related homicides, concurrent with an increase in gun sales and a drop in the overall violent crime rate.

Can you explain gun deaths by name?

Statistics say Jamaal has a 99% chance of dying from gun fire than a guy named Joe.

As a learned scholar, do you feel baby mama's should have a prescibed list of names to pick from?
 

Huey » 02 Jan 2024, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2024, 9:06 am

You can read.  It seems we are done with this discussion.

1.  Violent crime is down.  To include homicide.

2.  While homicide by firearms is above pre pandemic levels it is down in 2022.

3.  Child homicide by firearm is up and is driven by the 4 cities mentioned above.

IF you have anything concerning those 4 concise bullet points let me know.  I am not interested in your whiny reframes and diversions.

And another city with an increase:

More than 90 percent of the killings through Dec. 27 were by gunfire, police said. Of the 75 cases in which they had made an arrest by late November, they said, the motive in nearly half was an “argument.” At least 12 of the 75 cases stemmed from domestic disputes, eight were attributed to robberies and five to neighborhood conflicts.

No fewer than 106 children and teenagers were hit by bullets, and 16 of them were killed (while two others were beaten to death and another was fatally stabbed). Sixteen juveniles also were slain by gunfire in 2022, compared with eight the year before. And more youngsters pulled triggers in 2023 than in the past. In the first nine months of the year, for example, police reported making 458 arrests of juveniles for robbery, homicide or assault with a dangerous weapon — a 10 percent increase from the same period in 2022.The killings in 2023 started about 6 p.m. on Jan. 3 and continued through the last days of the year.

2023 was District’s deadliest year in more than two decades

https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va ... -violence/
 
 

Huey » 14 Dec 2023, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Dec 2023, 12:14 pm

As far as what I read I check Drudge, the NY Post, CNN and MSNBC in the morning to see all sides take on any new issue.

So, no need to ever ask again, Meltdown Legacy Boy.  Put in your sig box if you need to remember it.  

Acknowledge you have received this.  

 

@R. Suave  

Staple it to your forehead. 

Huey » 19 Jan 2024, 9:39 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 9:39 am

@R. Suave  

Staple it to your forehead.

Even if he did, he would still ask for it again...

 

RedheadedStranger » 19 Jan 2024, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 9:41 am

Even if he did, he would still ask for it again...

Sometimes I like to publicly embarrass him.  
 

Huey » 19 Jan 2024, 9:39 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 9:39 am

@R. Suave  

Staple it to your forehead.

You spend an hour watching The Five....then settle in for Gutfeld..

You don't spend 15 minutes on any other source....unless you pledged to read the entire cover of the NYPost in one shot.

Nod.

Huey » 19 Jan 2024, 9:42 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 9:42 am

Sometimes I like to publicly embarrass him.

He does that to himself all the time... he certainly doesn't need any extra help.

 

 

R.Suave » 19 Jan 2024, 9:43 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 9:43 am

You spend an hour watching The Five....then settle in for Gutfeld..

You don't spend 15 minutes on any other source....unless you pledged to read the entire cover of the NYPost in one shot.

Nod.

 

By the time I watch them I have already gone thru the sources listed.

You can stop with the fairy tales and lies.  ANd don't ask.

Bye.

R.Suave » 19 Jan 2024, 9:43 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 9:43 am

You spend an hour watching The Five....then settle in for Gutfeld..

You don't spend 15 minutes on any other source....unless you pledged to read the entire cover of the NYPost in one shot.

Nod.

 

You spend an hour watching The Five....then settle in for Gutfeld..

And PS.  That is actually the reverse of how I watch them.

Go ahead and ask me why....