Liberal Forum

Huey » 19 Jan 2024, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 9:51 am

You spend an hour watching The Five....then settle in for Gutfeld..

And PS.  That is actually the reverse of how I watch them.

Go ahead and ask me why....

It's not about the order....it's about the total time spent.

Cretin.
 

Huey » 19 Jan 2024, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 9:50 am

By the time I watch them I have already gone thru the sources listed.

You can stop with the fairy tales and lies.  ANd don't ask.

Bye.

It's about the time invested, lying little loser..

 

R.Suave » 19 Jan 2024, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 9:55 am

It's not about the order....it's about the total time spent.

Cretin.

You had a bad few past days days. 

1. Your pic that you thought was Trump turned out to be Cohn's boyfriend this whole time. You must be going through the 5 stages of grief on that one. 
2. I wouldn't help you with the math because you refused to abide by my two rules. 
3. You knowingly entered a deal where you agreed to prove that you were a dishonest lying sack of ****. 
4. @Huey  @Redheaded Stranger  ​​​​@Cannonpointer  gave you a serious beat down on pretty much every thing. 


You should take some time off and rest. 

R.Suave » 19 Jan 2024, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 9:55 am

It's not about the order....it's about the total time spent.

Cretin.
 

 

No, it is about YOUR comment.  

I watch Gutfeld FIRST, it is the day before.  Meaning any news they do is from the day before.  Plus, moron, it is a light night comedy show.  The number 1 late night show.  

Next, by the time I watch the five I already know what the news is because I went to the sources listed.  You are not very smart.  So there is no way EITHER can be a primary source, idiot. 
 

R.Suave » 19 Jan 2024, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 9:57 am

It's about the time invested, lying little loser..

LMAO!  You're an idiot. 

Huey » 19 Jan 2024, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 10:02 am

No, it is about YOUR comment.  

I watch Gutfeld FIRST, it is the day before.  Meaning any news they do is from the day before.  Plus, moron, it is a light night comedy show.  The number 1 late night show.  

Next, by the time I watch the five I already know what the news is because I went to the sources listed.  You are not very smart.  So there is no way EITHER can be a primary source, idiot.

Your PRIMARY source is the one you spend most time with....you spend 2 hrs steeping in the FOX BDS tub 5 days per week.

You spend, at most, 20 minutes per day reading in total.

R.Suave » 19 Jan 2024, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 10:07 am

Your PRIMARY source is the one you spend most time with....you spend 2 hrs steeping in the FOX BDS tub 5 days per week.

You spend, at most, 20 minutes per day reading in total.



 

Are you dizzy yet with all that spinning and lying?



 
 

Huey » 19 Jan 2024, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 10:10 am

Are you dizzy yet with all that spinning and lying?

Then post your math...

What do you spend more than 2hrs reading each day?
 

R.Suave » 19 Jan 2024, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 10:12 am

Then post your math...

What do you spend more than 2hrs reading each day?
 

 

No need.  A primary source is NOT based on time spent.  It is the first news sources you go to.  By the time I watch either one of them I already have gone to my primary NEWS Sources.

And neither show is a straight NEWS show.  

Sit and Spin, tell some more lies.  

We are done with this discussion. 

Huey » 19 Jan 2024, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 10:24 am

No need. A primary source is NOT based on time spent.  It is the first news sources you go to.  By the time I watch either one of them I already have gone to my primary NEWS Sources.

And neither show is a straight NEWS show.  

Sit and Spin, tell some more lies.  

We are done with this discussion.

Another runner.

 

R.Suave » 19 Jan 2024, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 10:12 am

Then post your math...

What do you spend more than 2hrs reading each day?

Do it yourself...oh wait. You are innumerate. Never mind. 

I am certain he reads books that aren't fill of pictures like you do. Are you still trying to get through "Green Eggs and Ham" by Dr. Seuss?

R.Suave » 19 Jan 2024, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 10:26 am

Another runner.

Try Again.  you line out facts that show you are wrong:

No need. A primary source is NOT based on time spent.  It is the first news sources you go to.  By the time I watch either one of them I already have gone to my primary NEWS Sources.

And neither show is a straight NEWS show.  

Sit and Spin, tell some more lies.  

We are done with this discussion.

R.Suave » 19 Jan 2024, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 10:26 am

Another runner.

More inane questions from you.

Nobody runs from you Rico... they just refuse to play your silly games.

Just the facts ma'am 

Vegas » 19 Jan 2024, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 10:00 am

You had a bad few past days days. 

1. Your pic that you thought was Trump turned out to be Cohn's boyfriend this whole time. You must be going through the 5 stages of grief on that one. 
2. I wouldn't help you with the math because you refused to abide by my two rules. 
3. You knowingly entered a deal where you agreed to prove that you were a dishonest lying sack of ****. 
4. @Huey  @Redheaded Stranger  ​​​​@Cannonpointer  gave you a serious beat down on pretty much every thing. 

You should take some time off and rest.

I think he gets off on the beatings... I mean he must.

It's like a masochist thing.
 

RedheadedStranger » 19 Jan 2024, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 10:37 am

More inane questions from you.

Nobody runs from you Rico... they just refuse to play your silly games.

Just the facts ma'am

Now you can go back to running...

"THEY'RE NOT CAPTIONS.....THEY'RE TAGS!"......(....sob....snot bubble bursts....)

R.Suave » 19 Jan 2024, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 10:48 am

Now you can go back to running...

"THEY'RE NOT CAPTIONS.....THEY'RE TAGS!"......(....sob....snot bubble bursts....)

Don't cry little buddy.

It's gonna be okay.

 
 
 

RedheadedStranger » 19 Jan 2024, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 10:50 am

Don't cry little buddy.

It's gonna be okay.

You lost to a far more detailed photometric analysis.




 
 

RedheadedStranger » 19 Jan 2024, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 10:50 am

Don't cry little buddy.

It's gonna be okay.

 
 
 

 

 

R.Suave » 19 Jan 2024, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 10:51 am

You lost to a far more detailed photometric analysis.

Oh yeah... the Vanity Fair Society page "caption".

 
 

RedheadedStranger » 19 Jan 2024, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jan 2024, 10:57 am

Oh yeah... the Vanity Fair Society page "caption".

https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-h ... on-1862143