Liberal Forum

Huey » 15 Dec 2023, 11:25 am » wrote: ↑

15 Dec 2023, 11:25 am

Ain't on this thread.

Didn't think you had the balls to post your list.

you can't read...

Each of us was to take turns listing occasions where each took ONE clear stand and was subsequently validated by events.

I've done so, now run.
 

R.Suave » 15 Dec 2023, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑

15 Dec 2023, 11:28 am

you can't read...

Each of us was to take turns listing occasions where each took ONE clear stand and was subsequently validated by events.

I've done so, now run.

You do this **** all the time. I can read.  We were talking about candidates and here is your bait and switch.

Sorry, not interested, coward.

Huey » 15 Dec 2023, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑

15 Dec 2023, 11:29 am

You do this **** all the time. I can read.  We were talking about candidates and here is your bait and switch.

Sorry, not interested, coward.

No we weren't.

As I said at the outset, run.
 

R.Suave » 15 Dec 2023, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑

15 Dec 2023, 11:32 am

No we weren't.

As I said at the outset, run.

if THAT is what you want to discuss go start a water cooler thread, Bait and Switch .

The New Murican-Zionist Flag...

or how the world sees MurKKKa now...

https://twitter.com/i/status/1735430497512144923
 

R.Suave » 15 Dec 2023, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑

15 Dec 2023, 10:41 am

Little Cornhole,

Do you want to go through a list?

I'll post one of mine, then you can post one of yours.

Deal?

The old bait and switch at work.  

R.Suave » 15 Dec 2023, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑

15 Dec 2023, 11:11 am

No...you opine on matters about which you know nothing.

Because you're a narcissist.

LOL> Could your projection be anymore blatant?     

Huey » 15 Dec 2023, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑

15 Dec 2023, 11:36 am

if THAT is what you want to discuss go start a water cooler thread, Bait and Switch .

No, lying little controlly...

R.Suave » 15 Dec 2023, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑

15 Dec 2023, 11:47 am

No, lying little controlly...

You may speak to yourself on this diversion, Bait and Switch.

Huey » 15 Dec 2023, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑

15 Dec 2023, 11:44 am

The old bait and switch at work.

are these your words?

Not really...that would mean you have to take a stand.  We all know how your feel about doing that....

Do you recall what you meant?

R. » wrote:

29 Jan 1970, 1:06 am

Huey » 15 Dec 2023, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑

15 Dec 2023, 10:00 am

Actually, I hope public sentiment carries thru the year for Nikki Haley.

Another stand, Toady?

 

 

R. » wrote:

29 Jan 1970, 1:06 am

Huey » 15 Dec 2023, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑

15 Dec 2023, 10:07 am

LMAO!  I see you are simmering before the daily meltdown because you really don't have anything.

Been a Nikki booster all along, Toady?

 

 

R. » wrote:

29 Jan 1970, 1:07 am

Huey » 15 Dec 2023, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑

15 Dec 2023, 10:28 am

She was on the list from the get go.  I don't settle on one person in these situations until we start the primaries.  As you implied earlier, it is too far out.  

Carry on.

As far as  you we know your stand is to support whomever the left decides to run.

She was on the list from the get go.  I don't settle on one person 

unbelievable....

You rejected 2ndBesty in favor of BetterThan2ndBesty, until BT2B crashed and burned.

Now you'll have 2ndBesty tearing into 2ndBetterThan2ndBesty, Toady.

Where will you run?

 

 

R. » wrote:

29 Jan 1970, 1:07 am

Huey » 15 Dec 2023, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑

15 Dec 2023, 10:39 am

LMAO!            Alleged stand you won't defend or answer questions about.

LMAO!  That is why they call it election season, T5J.  

Pepper Spray, this post of yours simply proves you are only here to instigate, (start ****), troll, and try to piss people off.  You are not very good at it, my puppet.

Little Cornhole,

Do you want to go through a list?

I'll post one of mine, then you can post one of yours.

Deal?
 

 

Next time be clear on what you want to list.  

R.Suave » 15 Dec 2023, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑

15 Dec 2023, 11:49 am

are these your words?

Do you recall what you meant?

Make your point.  And if the my screen name is on the snapback that answer your question.

Now, I told you I am not interested.  

Huey » 15 Dec 2023, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑

15 Dec 2023, 11:48 am

You may speak to yourself on this diversion, Bait and Switch.

Don't run from your words again...

It isn't manly.

Huey » 15 Dec 2023, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑

15 Dec 2023, 11:52 am

Make your point.  And if the my screen name is on the snapback that answer your question.

Now, I told you I am not interested.

Answer the question, little runny.


The point is obvious.

Z09 » 15 Dec 2023, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑

15 Dec 2023, 11:53 am

Rumors?

7% interest rates are only "rumors"...??

If Biden is still in office, and he and America continue to spend, why is inflation plummeting?

R.Suave » 15 Dec 2023, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑

15 Dec 2023, 11:54 am

Answer the question, little runny.

The point is obvious.

I have already shown what the discussioin was about.  And I told you I am not interested in your diversion.  

You rread this, right?

Make your point.  And if the my screen name is on the snapback that answer your question.

Now, I told you I am not interested.  

R.Suave » 15 Dec 2023, 11:56 am » wrote: ↑

15 Dec 2023, 11:56 am

If Biden is still in office, and he and America continue to spend, why is inflation plummeting?

More bait and switch.

Huey » 15 Dec 2023, 11:57 am » wrote: ↑

15 Dec 2023, 11:57 am

I have already shown what the discussioin was about.  And I told you I am not interested in your diversion.  

You rread this, right?

Make your point.  And if the my screen name is on the snapback that answer your question.

Now, I told you I am not interested.

I just posted your words..

You're too **** to acknowledge them.

Ask me why..

Huey » 15 Dec 2023, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑

15 Dec 2023, 11:58 am

More bait and switch.

Shut the **** up, Controlly...you're running from your words.

I'm making a case.
 

R.Suave » 15 Dec 2023, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑

15 Dec 2023, 11:58 am

I just posted your words..

You're too **** to acknowledge them.

Ask me why..

So why are you asking if they are my words instead of just making your point?  You are not a lawyer, or an investigator nor is this a court of law.  And as I said, I am not interested in your games.

I told you, you can go start a thread about your diversion in the water cooler section.  Make your case plain and concise, with no wiggle room.   Then I will CONSIDER playing your game.

I was in here discussing interest rates and election choices, T5J.