Cannonpointer » 17 Dec 2023, 6:12 pm » wrote: ↑ A nation that cannot house its people has no business playing empire games.
If so many people are just sorry pieces of **** that homelessness is all their fault, why don't other nations have roughly the same percentage of homelessness?
And if these homeless people are NOT just sorry pieces of ****, then who is? If they did not make themselves homeless, who did?
Cannonpointer » 17 Dec 2023, 6:12 pm » wrote: ↑ A nation that cannot house its people has no business playing empire games.
If so many people are just sorry pieces of **** that homelessness is all their fault, why don't other nations have roughly the same percentage of homelessness?
And if these homeless people are NOT just sorry pieces of ****, then who is? If they did not make themselves homeless, who did?
The deep state. Bankers, CIA, others with incentives. Kids in school are marked (and marketed to) to become druggies. They make the choices that ruin them before they are old enough to contract. The parents are bypassed by the school system.DeezerShoove » 17 Dec 2023, 7:18 pm » wrote: ↑ I guess I'm just tired of it all.
People taking drugs that they know will ruin them just because they're available.
That has become an American culture. So, it's a good question: Who did it?
Well, I would say a lot of them are battered women (often with kids) and surplus males. If you look at a male child born to a she-boon, chances are a life of crime, or a life of poverty (or both), are his inheritance.DeezerShoove » 17 Dec 2023, 7:18 pm » wrote: ↑ The other part of homelessness (non-druggies), the people who truly want to be pulled out of that...
Do we even know who those are? A minority of the total, I'd reckon.
They probably weren't born homeless.
So what put them there? Does any "help" cure whatever that problem was?
It goes back to "teach them to fish, not just give them a free Fishwich."
Yikes....thats predator who used to post
That is a sad story.DeezerShoove » 17 Dec 2023, 8:06 pm » wrote: ↑ Mitch Snyder caused a lot of bums and vagrants to become homeless.
They didn't even know they got a new title...![]()
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/ ... 8a7649209/
WORD.Cannonpointer » 17 Dec 2023, 6:12 pm » wrote: ↑ A nation that cannot house its people has no business playing empire games.
If so many people are just sorry pieces of **** that homelessness is all their fault, why don't other nations have roughly the same percentage of homelessness?
And if these homeless people are NOT just sorry pieces of ****, then who is? If they did not make themselves homeless, who did?
This is what I tell defenders of capitalism who retreat to "That's CRONY capitalism." I'm like, no son. Never let an adjective distract ya from the noun.
If I recall correctly, it was the Socialists that pushed FDR to into the Social Security program,Cannonpointer » 17 Dec 2023, 8:38 pm » wrote: ↑ This is what I tell defenders of capitalism who retreat to "That's CRONY capitalism." I'm like, no son. Never let an adjective distract ya from the noun.
I don't care if its midnight capitalism, jayhawk capitalism, or bellula capitalism - it's **** capitalism. Cronyism is certainly a feature of capitalism, and every other **** ism. That's why free trade is the answer - it's not a **** ism. It's just people doing what God intended - and with no special help or hindrance from the state.
Another thing I like to point out to the tards is that socialism is a feature and outgrowth of capitalism. It doesn't result from free trade (which they incorrectly collapse with capitalism, notwithstanding the two are polar opposites). Socialism is what saves capitalism from riots and blood in the streets. The socialism of FDR hauled capitalism up a **** cliff face in the midst of a free fall.
Imagine how the conjobs - the same ones who curse FDR for the massive public infrastructure projects he undertook - would have panty-pranced if Trump had undertaken great public works projects. For example, retention ponds in the midwest capturing annual flood waters and a pipeline over the rockies to deliver those nuisance waters to the arid and thirsty southwest. He would be the greatest ever - and the cognitive dissonance would just be another lump beside that jism they just swallowed.Sumela » 17 Dec 2023, 8:46 pm » wrote: ↑ If I recall correctly, it was the Socialists that pushed FDR to into the Social Security program,
as well as other public spending policies. Some like Hinkle and Haz, believe the
Socialists then laid down too easily instead of continuing to push.
This is how my sister tells it.....,

WORD. Or If like Russia and China, they round up the homeless, the few that exist,Cannonpointer » 17 Dec 2023, 8:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Imagine how the conjobs - the same ones who curse FDR for the massive public infrastructure projects he undertook - would have panty-pranced if Trump had undertaken great public works projects. For example, retention ponds in the midwest capturing annual flood waters and a pipeline over the rockies to deliver those nuisance water to the arid and thirsty southwest. He would be the greatest ever - and the cognitive dissonance would just be another lump beside that jism they just swallowed.
Cannonpointer » 17 Dec 2023, 8:24 pm » wrote: ↑ That is a sad story.
Self hatred'll kill ya.
That's why I practice self love if it lobsters me.
''''It's probably always a record high...'''DeezerShoove » 17 Dec 2023, 9:54 pm » wrote: ↑ **** admitted propagandist and druggie.
More pathetic than sad...
Like your self love.![]()
btw
Is there a census on the number of homeless?
How the hell do they count those folks? Gotta be some weird extrapolation.
Sidewalk turds per block.
Ratio of "squeegees" to "this sucks" signs dozing next to a cup. (Working bum vs lazy bum.)
It's probably always a record high...
**** if I know, bro. I only pretend to care when it is politically expedient. The rest of the time, I change routes to avoid the stinky ****.DeezerShoove » 17 Dec 2023, 9:54 pm » wrote: ↑ **** admitted propagandist and druggie.
More pathetic than sad...
Like your self love.![]()
btw
Is there a census on the number of homeless?
How the hell do they count those folks? Gotta be some weird extrapolation.
Sidewalk turds per block.
Ratio of "squeegees" to "this sucks" signs dozing next to a cup. (Working bum vs lazy bum.)
It's probably always a record high...
Right! I mean, what's the big deal - Joe Biden pinched a little girl's nipples. She probably liked it. Wanted more, right?Bidencrimefamily » 16 Dec 2023, 10:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Don't care if they believe the truth or not. Jesus told me to tell the truth no matter what and so I do.
Nothing more misogynistic than a leftist. Walking mommy issues is what those *** are.Skans » 18 Dec 2023, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑ Right! I mean, what's the big deal - Joe Biden pinched a little girl's nipples. She probably liked it. Wanted more, right?
if tRump did what he said he was gonna do (in the beginning)Cannonpointer » 17 Dec 2023, 8:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Imagine how the conjobs - the same ones who curse FDR for the massive public infrastructure projects he undertook - would have panty-pranced if Trump had undertaken great public works projects. For example, retention ponds in the midwest capturing annual flood waters and a pipeline over the rockies to deliver those nuisance waters to the arid and thirsty southwest. He would be the greatest ever - and the cognitive dissonance would just be another lump beside that jism they just swallowed.
No no - it has a MAGNIFICENT profit margin. But that margin unfolds over generations - and in case you had not noticed, **** the unborn right in the *** is the american way. Repukes and Democ rats agree on that universally.Mrkelly » 18 Dec 2023, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑ if tRump did what he said he was gonna do (in the beginning)
he could have had a shot at Mount Rushmore
my dad took one of those jobs that FDR offered
he joined the CCC
and he was grateful
If it wasn’t for that
he might have ended up being one of those low life homeless people
or a bum or a hobo as the kids said back then
A program like that could go a long way today
but sadly
It has a low profit margin
how many capitalists would even consider a profit that “unfolds over generations “Cannonpointer » 18 Dec 2023, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑ No no - it has a MAGNIFICENT profit margin. But that margin unfolds over generations - and in case you had not noticed, **** the unborn right in the *** is the american way. Repukes and Democ rats agree on that universally.
FDR thought a century out. These guys care only about next quarter.
Indeed. The want the blessing to accrue to THEM and **** posterity.Mrkelly » 18 Dec 2023, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑ how many capitalists would even consider a profit that “unfolds over generations “
a rhetorical question obviously