And even then.if it wasn't for democratic votes George Santos wouldn't of gotten removed.Bidencrimefamily » 17 Dec 2023, 9:14 pm » wrote: ↑ I thought that you don't remove a republican till he is indicted like Santos guys.
He insists it's ok, cause he made a sex tape of the incident.Bidencrimefamily » 17 Dec 2023, 9:14 pm » wrote: ↑ I thought that you don't remove a republican till he is indicted like Santos guys.
I really don't believe this women. I'm having a hard time believing her at this point. This makes me wonder why the Republicans are folding on the guy after holding on to Santos for so long. Is it because the women was getting bi.R.Suave » 17 Dec 2023, 10:14 pm » wrote: ↑ He insists it's ok, cause he made a sex tape of the incident.
BFC's a mental midget...michaelf » 18 Dec 2023, 5:16 am » wrote: ↑ There's a difference between a party employee and an elected legislator...the difference, of course, being that one is hired and the other is elected by the people they represent. If one is hired they can be fired. The usual way of getting rid of one who is elected is by voting them out. Those who did the hiring also do the firing.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom He makes up for it by sucking hard.
a bowling ball through a garden hose level...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom michaelf » 18 Dec 2023, 5:16 am » wrote: ↑ There's a difference between a party employee and an elected legislator...the difference, of course, being that one is hired and the other is elected by the people they represent. If one is hired they can be fired. The usual way of getting rid of one who is elected is by voting them out. Those who did the hiring also do the firing.
Santos is simply a better comedian than you are competent to comprehend.Bidencrimefamily » 17 Dec 2023, 7:11 pm » wrote: ↑ https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/flo ... -105727326
It must be serious if the republican party is hammering him for this.
I mean the republican congress held on to Santos for over a year.
His wife is the leader of the women for liberty and Christian and his wife had hot 3 somes with this lady. I guess his wife is bi.
Santos is a congenital, pathological, untalented liar. I have seldom seen a person with less character. Now Trump is a great liar. Hyperbolic.Cannonpointer » 18 Dec 2023, 7:20 pm » wrote: ↑ Santos is simply a better comedian than you are competent to comprehend.
Satire is not in the wheelhouse of the lowbrows. I think slapstick is more your speed.
He had enough talent to get himself elected - but not enough to keep himself from being exposed. So of course, you are technically correct. But you have let the truth get in the way of a punchline. And that makes you a killjoy piss-pot. Hope you're happy with yourself.Punch » 18 Dec 2023, 9:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Santos is a congenital, pathological, untalented liar. I have seldom seen a person with less character. Now Trump is a great liar. Hyperbolic.
What’s your opinion on Menendez?Cannonpointer » 18 Dec 2023, 7:20 pm » wrote: ↑ Santos is simply a better comedian than you are competent to comprehend.
Satire is not in the wheelhouse of the lowbrows. I think slapstick is more your speed.
I think he's meskin.