Liberal Forum

Crime data is one that demands some context and life experience to really draw the meaning out of.

Huey » 18 Dec 2023, 2:09 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Dec 2023, 2:09 pm

Nah.  It is you anal, arrogant persona that is the problem.  You can't stand being wrong.  And it has not been a good two days for you.  Now, ifyou have nothing to say on the violent crime rate I am done curbstomping you.

Tiny,

Take the L.

Crawl under the porch.

Add it to your vast collection.
 

No...that's the wonder of words.

They mean things..

Nah.

Portrait of a MAGAt

R.Suave » 18 Dec 2023, 2:17 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Dec 2023, 2:17 pm

Tiny,

Take the L.

Crawl under the porch.

Add it to your vast collection.
 

 

No reason to take an L.  You never quoted the the post.  Let me know when you do.  

Huey » 18 Dec 2023, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Dec 2023, 2:25 pm

No reason to take an L.  You never quoted the the post.  Let me know when you do.

Literally repeatedly.

Z09 » 18 Dec 2023, 2:17 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Dec 2023, 2:17 pm

The Atlantic?

They're the rag that quotes "anonymous sources"...

"They have credibility"

Post your sources, dear...

You're very quiet about them.

And do it the first time...
 

R.Suave » 18 Dec 2023, 2:29 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Dec 2023, 2:29 pm

Literally repeatedly.

No, you chopped one post into two different quote boxes.  I'll show you how it is done.  

Huey » 18 Dec 2023, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑

18 Dec 2023, 11:49 am

Where is yours?  

I don't know what rock you have been living under the past few months but there has been report after report that violent crime is down across the nation.  

It is also fact that since COVID we have seen some of the highest monthly and annual firearm sales ever.  

So the talking point that more guns equates to more crime is false.  

 

@R. Suave  

Every post before it and every post after it contains 'violent crime".  So I left it out of ONE SENTENCE.  

This is how a man does it, Pepper Spray.  No need to edit and supplies a link.  Tattoo that L on your forhead.  And do it backwards so when you look in the mirror you understand it. 

Huey » 18 Dec 2023, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Dec 2023, 2:32 pm

No, you chopped one post into two different quote boxes.  I'll show you how it is done.

No...I took two sentences from two of your posts, on the same thread.

Never again ask why I must make you acknowledge your words.
 

Huey » 18 Dec 2023, 2:34 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Dec 2023, 2:34 pm

@R. Suave  

Every post before it and every post after it contains 'violent crime".  So I left it out of ONE SENTENCE.  

This is how a man does it, Pepper Spray.  No need to edit and supplies a link.  Tattoo that L on your forhead.  And do it backwards so when you look in the mirror you understand it.

Tiny,

It's not about every other word you've posted. It's about the two particular assertions that are in unambiguous conflict.

And that is entirely ignoring the fact that murders with firearms have nearly doubled since 2012.
 

R.Suave » 18 Dec 2023, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Dec 2023, 2:35 pm

No...I took two sentences from two of your posts, on the same thread.

Never again ask why I must make you acknowledge your words.

Keep whining....

I have reposted them numerous times.  In full, in context, and with a link.  Unlike you.  That means I acknowledged, idiot.  

R.Suave » 18 Dec 2023, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Dec 2023, 2:40 pm

Tiny,

It's not about every other word you've posted. It's about the two particular assertions that are in unambiguous conflict.

And that is entirely ignoring the fact that murders with firearms have nearly doubled since 2012.
 

 

Not ignoring anything.  I gave you three bullet points.  Now make your case.  

Huey » 18 Dec 2023, 2:42 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Dec 2023, 2:42 pm

Not ignoring anything.  I gave you three bullet points.  Now make your case.

No.

It is...

I've made my case.

There is nothing in the OP that bears on the gun control debate.
 

Z09 » 18 Dec 2023, 2:44 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Dec 2023, 2:44 pm

The Atlantic was told that Trump called dead soldiers "losers"...
The editor was asked where they heard that and was told it was "anonymous"..
But the ran the story anyway.

Journalism 2020

https://www.cnn.com/2023/10/02/politics ... index.html


post your sources.
 

R.Suave » 18 Dec 2023, 2:44 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Dec 2023, 2:44 pm

No.

It is...

I've made my case.

There is nothing in the OP that bears on the gun control debate.

Nobody mentioned gun control and as usual, you made no case.   You lose, again.  

 

Huey » 18 Dec 2023, 2:48 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Dec 2023, 2:48 pm

Nobody mentioned gun control and as usual, you made no case.   You lose, again.

Then go ahead and translate this gibberish...it was your first contribution.

While I won't tie the decrease if violent crime to more firearm ownership I will say that more guns apparently DO NOT equate to more violent crime.  And that has been the talking point of the gunophobes.

 

R.Suave » 18 Dec 2023, 2:51 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Dec 2023, 2:51 pm

Then go ahead and translate this gibberish...it was your first contribution.


 

 

2nd time:

Here are the facts of the discussion before you attempted to hijack.

1.  Violent crime is down.  

2.  Firearm sales have been at a record pace.

3.  To this point the theory that more firearms means more violent crime is false at this time.  

viewtopic.php?p=2444256#p2444256

Please pay attention.  This constant reposing is like dealing with a spoiled princess.

when and if you try to correlate gun control laws and ups/down in crime.. the usual issue is that they do not incorporate a long enough time in their series. It takes time for laws to filter into society's actions. The second issue is that income levels matter.. a lot. Lower income levels are not as well versed in the law and so are largely ignorant of it until multiple arrests have been made.

Huey » 18 Dec 2023, 2:54 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Dec 2023, 2:54 pm

2nd time:

Here are the facts of the discussion before you attempted to hijack.

1.  Violent crime is down.  

2.  Firearm sales have been at a record pace.

3.  To this point the theory that more firearms means more violent crime is false at this time.  

viewtopic.php?p=2444256#p2444256

Please pay attention.  This constant reposing is like dealing with a spoiled princess.

We're looking at your actual words...

No one cares about your narrative.