You were taken apart, so now you've re-written your *******, to qualify it with yet more *******.Vegas » 18 Dec 2023, 12:43 pm » wrote: ↑ @Huey just as predicted. He got his *** stomped again, so his response is to strike through![]()
![]()
He sucks at even the most fundamental of mathematics.
R.Suave » 18 Dec 2023, 12:46 pm » wrote: ↑ You were taken apart, so now you've re-written your *******, to qualify it with yet more *******.
It is what you do.
Ask me why.
Can you explain the difference between a "factor" and an "order of magnitude"...
You want me to savage your re-write?Vegas » 18 Dec 2023, 12:47 pm » wrote: ↑ LOL! Another lie ^^^
You are on a roll with your lies today. Are you having a meltdown?
And rule, idiot. **** your demands.
Do you want it done, you ******?Vegas » 18 Dec 2023, 12:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Through your own rewrite?
Yeah, okay. I surely trust a habitual liar like you.
R.Suave » 18 Dec 2023, 12:44 pm » wrote: ↑ So what?
You always do when caught saying Stupid ****.
But we are looking at two specific pieces of Stupid **** that contradict each other.
These pieces of Stupid **** stand on their own. Context will not change the meaning of either.
R.Suave » 18 Dec 2023, 12:48 pm » wrote: ↑ Can you explain the difference between a "factor" and an "order of magnitude"...
That's what I thought.
So why are you yapping?
We are talking about your second stab at math, Crackhead.Vegas » 18 Dec 2023, 12:56 pm » wrote: ↑ If you can prove the correct claim. Sure.
Show where I agreed to your judges.
I don't give two **** about your opinion of your judges regarding their fake abilities to read. Prove where I agreed to them.
Good luck.
Then how the **** would you know who got "spanked", lying little *******?Huey » 18 Dec 2023, 1:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Don't really care. You came in here to troll and got spanked.
That's not what you said. You are already lying and evading. @Huey I would have won if we bet. LOLR.Suave » 18 Dec 2023, 1:03 pm » wrote: ↑ We are talking about your second stab at math, Crackhead.
Focus.
No, it is..Vegas » 18 Dec 2023, 1:06 pm » wrote: ↑ That's not what you said. You are already lying and evading. @Huey I would have won if we bet. LOL
You are not intelligent enough to even grasp what the word 'proportionate' means.
You didn't even read it.
No, it isn't...R.Suave » 18 Dec 2023, 1:08 pm » wrote: ↑ No, it is..
Don't tell me what I meant.
Do you want me to humiliate you again?
Say "please".
Are these your words?Huey » 18 Dec 2023, 1:02 pm » wrote: ↑ THere was only ONE stand. You had to edit one of the posts by separating. You were busted. So where I your stand?
Are these your words?More guns do not necessarily equate to more violent crime
Is it "not necessarily" true, or is it "false"?So the talking point that more guns equates to more crime is false
If you weren't humiliated in the first instance, why did you humiliate yourself again?Vegas » 18 Dec 2023, 1:12 pm » wrote: ↑ No, it isn't...
Someone has to tell you what you meant...you never know what the hell you are talking about.
I am still waiting for the first time to be humiliated.
You don't need my permission, *******. If you have something, then **** say it.
R.Suave » 18 Dec 2023, 1:13 pm » wrote: ↑ Are these your words?
Are these your words?
Is it "not necessarily" true, or is it "false"?
R.Suave » 18 Dec 2023, 1:15 pm » wrote: ↑ If you weren't humiliated in the first instance, why did you humiliate yourself again?