Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 19 Dec 2023, 8:09 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 8:09 pm

I'd kill a *** for a pair - so I guess I was being a LITTLE hypocritical. 

Thanks for reaching out, bro.

I'd do it for nothing.

Don't sweat it, homey. It's all good.
 

impartialobserver » 19 Dec 2023, 8:21 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 8:21 pm

had they kept him, a significant portion of their core viewership was going to stop watching that show, NFL Primetime, and went over to CBS or NBC. Actually, the ratings for that show did not increase during Limbaugh's time. They stayed about the same. This tells me that the core viewers simply tolerated him. He offered no actual football insights. I watched that show with him on it and was always amazed that they had him on it.

I also thought he was a bit of a strange choice. They wanted his fan base, he didn't bring it - perhaps his faux pas was their golden ticket to drop him without pissing anyone off except the weirdos and the conflicted. 

I withdraw my critique, sir (if that is how you identify - smirk). 
 

Cannonpointer » 19 Dec 2023, 8:24 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 8:24 pm

I also thought he was a bit of a strange choice. They wanted his fan base, he didn't bring it - perhaps his faux pas was their golden ticket to drop him without pissing anyone off except the weirdos and the conflicted. 

I withdraw my critique, sir (if that is how you identify - smirk).

Tom jackson.. the longtime co-host of that show did not offer all that much insight either. Former players are not always the golden ticket. Some are good, Rodney Harrison and Boomer Esiason, and some are not. 

impartialobserver » 19 Dec 2023, 8:21 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 8:21 pm

had they kept him, a significant portion of their core viewership was going to stop watching that show, NFL Primetime, and went over to CBS or NBC. Actually, the ratings for that show did not increase during Limbaugh's time. They stayed about the same. This tells me that the core viewers simply tolerated him. He offered no actual football insights. I watched that show with him on it and was always amazed that they had him on it.

Then he went back on his show and said they were all liberals that hated the truth. 

impartialobserver » 19 Dec 2023, 8:21 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 8:21 pm

had they kept him, a significant portion of their core viewership was going to stop watching that show, NFL Primetime, and went over to CBS or NBC. Actually, the ratings for that show did not increase during Limbaugh's time. They stayed about the same. This tells me that the core viewers simply tolerated him. He offered no actual football insights. I watched that show with him on it and was always amazed that they had him on it.

I always thought Limbaugh getting involved with the NFL was kinda odd too. I know he was a big fan, but it just never seemed to be a good fit.

If I'm not mistaken his comments cost him partial ownership of a team as well. I can't recall the team but the NFL shot him down on his bid for it because of the ESPN flap.
 

impartialobserver » 19 Dec 2023, 8:28 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 8:28 pm

Tom jackson.. the longtime co-host of that show did not offer all that much insight either. Former players are not always the golden ticket. Some are good, Rodney Harrison and Boomer Esiason, and some are not.

I still think the game is gay. They have top of the line, beautiful women jumping up and down in skimpy outfits shaking their pretties, and all the camera wants to look at is a couple of sweaty dudes in the middle of the field. One guy is reaching under the other one's *** - it's just homoerotic horseplay as far as I can tell. 

He pulls out this huge ball. MUCH bigger than what should be found down there - which I find a bit "on the nose." And EVERYBODY wants this ball. Getting that ball seems to be on the top of everyone's list - like they are lusting after it.

And you notice, those players are always patting each other on the ***. Sorry - gay. 

Not gonna go into the names of the players' positions - okay fine: tight ends and wide receivers (gay). Then you have holders and safeties - probably something planned parenthood provides. And I don't even want to know what a "long snapper" does - I try to keep my innocence. I WILL NOT go to urban dictionary and check on that.

Did you know they have a position called "upback"? It's also called "Personal Protector." I'm not kidding. Do you think for ONE MINUTE that children should be exposed to this sport??? For pete sake, there is a "gunner" and a "jammer" - I do NOT consider myself a prude, but I have lines, mister. 

And their big event? It's called "SEWPER BOWL," and is accompanied by much fanfare and pomp - quite the drag show on every level. I've seen Ru Paul concerts that were less queer. 

Don't get me started on the other big sports - all gay. There are only two verifiably straight sports in america: rassling and bowling. Except in the bowling alley bathrooms - all bets are off. But on the lanes, it's clean. 

Cannonpointer » 19 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm

I still think the game is gay. They have top of the line, beautiful women jumping up and down in skimpy outfits shaking their pretties, and all the camera wants to look at is a couple of sweaty dudes in the middle of the field. One guy is reaching under the other one's *** - it's just homoerotic horseplay as far as I can tell. 

He pulls out this huge ball. MUCH bigger than what should be found down there - which I find a bit "on the nose." And EVERYBODY wants this ball. Getting that ball seems to be on the top of everyone's list - like they are lusting after it.

And you notice, those players are always patting each other on the ***. Sorry - gay. 

Not gonna go into the names of the players' positions - okay fine: tight ends and wide receivers (gay). Then you have holders and safeties - probably something planned parenthood provides. And I don't even want to know what a "long snapper" does - I try to keep my innocence. I WILL NOT go to urban dictionary and check on that.

Did you know they have a position called "upback"? It's also called "Personal Protector." I'm not kidding. Do you think for ONE MINUTE that children should be exposed to this sport??? For pete sake, there is a "gunner" and a "jammer" - I do NOT consider myself a prude, but I have lines, mister. 

And their big event? It's called "SEWPER BOWL," and is accompanied by much fanfare and pomp - quite the drag show on every level. I've seen Ru Paul concerts that were less queer. 

Don't get me started on the other big sports - all gay. There are only two verifiably straight sports in america: rassling and bowling. Except in the bowling alley bathrooms - all bets are off. But on the lanes, it's clean.

Well that's the beauty of the channel selector. You can select the channel you want to watch and not see gay. I do it everyday. 

Bidencrimefamily » 19 Dec 2023, 9:03 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 9:03 pm

Well that's the beauty of the channel selector. You can select the channel you want to watch and not see gay. I do it everyday.

Yeah sure you do. 

The lady doth protest too much methinks. 
 

Cannonpointer » 19 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm

Yeah sure you do. 

The lady doth protest too much methinks.

Don't know what to say about that. 

RedheadedStranger » 19 Dec 2023, 8:56 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 8:56 pm

I always thought Limbaugh getting involved with the NFL was kinda odd too. I know he was a big fan, but it just never seemed to be a good fit.

If I'm not mistaken his comments cost him partial ownership of a team as well. I can't recall the team but the NFL shot him down on his bid for it because of the ESPN flap.

The team was the st. Louis rams. The nfl did block him but two owners really led the charge, Jim irsay of the colts, and Lamar hunt of thr kansas city chiefs

Cannonpointer » 19 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm

I still think the game is gay. They have top of the line, beautiful women jumping up and down in skimpy outfits shaking their pretties, and all the camera wants to look at is a couple of sweaty dudes in the middle of the field. One guy is reaching under the other one's *** - it's just homoerotic horseplay as far as I can tell. 

He pulls out this huge ball. MUCH bigger than what should be found down there - which I find a bit "on the nose." And EVERYBODY wants this ball. Getting that ball seems to be on the top of everyone's list - like they are lusting after it.

And you notice, those players are always patting each other on the ***. Sorry - gay. 

Not gonna go into the names of the players' positions - okay fine: tight ends and wide receivers (gay). Then you have holders and safeties - probably something planned parenthood provides. And I don't even want to know what a "long snapper" does - I try to keep my innocence. I WILL NOT go to urban dictionary and check on that.

Did you know they have a position called "upback"? It's also called "Personal Protector." I'm not kidding. Do you think for ONE MINUTE that children should be exposed to this sport??? For pete sake, there is a "gunner" and a "jammer" - I do NOT consider myself a prude, but I have lines, mister. 

And their big event? It's called "SEWPER BOWL," and is accompanied by much fanfare and pomp - quite the drag show on every level. I've seen Ru Paul concerts that were less queer. 

Don't get me started on the other big sports - all gay. There are only two verifiably straight sports in america: rassling and bowling. Except in the bowling alley bathrooms - all bets are off. But on the lanes, it's clean.

I admire your sense of humor. Anyways, I like the sport but more specifically, the strategy on and off the field. For example, why have the Detroit Lions never been to a Super Bowl. With the league's socialist policies such as the salary cap, the draft, and free agency.. most teams eventually get to a super bowl or even win. That is what interests me. As for the other sports.. I follow and occasionally watch the NBA and NHL. MLB.. just not my thing. 

The one position that has ZERO Whities is Cornerback. The last starting whitey
CB I can recall was Jason Sehorn for the NYG. That was 20 years ago.

White guys are much better at putting homes on wheels

than black guys.

impartialobserver » 20 Dec 2023, 12:56 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2023, 12:56 pm

I admire your sense of humor. Anyways, I like the sport but more specifically, the strategy on and off the field. For example, why have the Detroit Lions never been to a Super Bowl. With the league's socialist policies such as the salary cap, the draft, and free agency.. most teams eventually get to a super bowl or even win. That is what interests me. As for the other sports.. I follow and occasionally watch the NBA and NHL. MLB.. just not my thing.

I am strictly a packers fan. 

When that team does well, an American city benefits - not some cocksucker who is pushing trans on children.

Cannonpointer » 20 Dec 2023, 1:13 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2023, 1:13 pm

I am strictly a packers fan. 

When that team does well, an American city benefits - not some cocksucker who is pushing trans on children. 

  Packers

I see what you did there

Cannonpointer » 20 Dec 2023, 1:13 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2023, 1:13 pm

I am strictly a packers fan. 

When that team does well, an American city benefits - not some cocksucker who is pushing trans on children.

I do not have an NFL team that I root for in particular. My only two teams in sports are Boise state Broncos and the Calgary Flames of the NHL. 

Mrkelly » 20 Dec 2023, 1:18 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2023, 1:18 pm

  Packers

I see what you did there

I'm serious. That's my team. 

I mean, I don't FOLLOW the sport. But if the packers are looking good, I'm happy - and likely to catch a game. 

The money has changed the sport. Primarily.. players, coaches, and GM's have became very risk averse. Hence, why we no longer see teams that are predicated on running between the tackles and throwing inside. That style of play which dominated the sport from its inception until Bill Walsh (49ers) changed the sport in the early 80''s does not work if you want your highly paid star to last. Today's defensive players are bigger and faster. In 1985.. only two players could run a 40 meter dash in less than 5 seconds that did not play WR or CB. Now, it is virtually necessary if you do not play DT (Defensive Tackle).

BTW...the two players were Lawrence Taylor and Carl Banks.


unsolicited and all but I predict that we see SF vs. MIA in the Super bowl with SF winning due to superior DL and LB play. As for next season.. we could see DET finally make a super bowl if they can figure out how to get better players at Inside LB and Free Safety. 

Mrkelly » 20 Dec 2023, 1:18 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2023, 1:18 pm

  Packers

I see what you did there

 
 

impartialobserver » 20 Dec 2023, 1:22 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2023, 1:22 pm

I do not have an NFL team that I root for in particular. My only two teams in sports are Boise state Broncos and the Calgary Flames of the NHL.

Islanders, Baby!