NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 4:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Name an economist who has done better over the past 25 years.
Here's a list of the top 10% of economic authors, where your idiot placed number 40.R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 4:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Name an economist who has done better over the past 25 years.
Yeah, and it's the system that's used by politicians to make the most horrible economic statics look less severe by not including items where prices are more volatile. Except that now the price of food continues to escalate, and gas and other energies haven't come within 90% of the cost of gas under Trump IN 3 YEARS NOW!R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 4:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Inflation has been quoted this way for more than 20 years.
If you had even the vaguest notion, this might be interesting.
And in one fell swoop you demolished his hero.Zeets2 » 19 Dec 2023, 6:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Here's a list of the top 10% of economic authors, where your idiot placed number 40.
I'd rely on any of them to follow before I believe a proven dunce like Krugman!
https://ideas.repec.org/top/top.person.all.html
Let us know when this translates to lower grocery bills, lower home energy bills, and lower bills in general.R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 8:43 am » wrote: ↑ VICTORY LAP!
Beware Economists Who Won’t Admit They Were Wrong
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/18/opin ... mists.html
From an economic point of view, 2023 will go down in the record books as one of the best years ever — a year in which inflation came down amazingly fast at no visible cost, defying the predictions of many economists that disinflation would require years of high unemployment....
How amazing has the economy been? As recently as March, the Federal Reserve committee that sets monetary policy projected that we’d end this year with 4.5 percent unemployment and with the Fed’s preferred “core” measure of inflation running at 3.6 percent. Last week, the same group projected year-end unemployment of only 3.8 percent and core inflation at only 3.2 percent. But actually the news is even better, because that last number is inflation for the year as a whole; over the six months ending in October, core inflation was running at 2.5 percent, and most analysts I follow believe that when November data come in later this week, it will show inflation down to around 2 percent, which is the Fed’s long-run target.
"Nooooooooo......7....6....3.5!"
In a rational universe this would occasion a Silence of The Influencers...where they fall, by the herd, never to be heard again.
But that grossly misunderestimates the vast Reservoir of Credulity and Innumeracy that is The Angry White Man and The Hole who serves him.
On a nominal, or relative, basis?Huey » 19 Dec 2023, 7:42 pm » wrote: ↑ Let us know when this translates to lower grocery bills, lower home energy bills, and lower bills in general.
At that point you elitist arrogant wannabes can tell Americans what to think.
On a real basis, **** idiot.
Ps. you should thank god you live in America. Your right to be stupid is protected in this country.
Please never presume to explain anything.Zeets2 » 19 Dec 2023, 6:59 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah, and it's the system that's used by politicians to make the most horrible economic statics look less severe by not including items where prices are more volatile. Except that now the price of food continues to escalate, and gas and other energies haven't come within 90% of the cost of gas under Trump IN 3 YEARS NOW!
So how is it that a wise sage like you thinks that those items that are conveniently left out of the formula are irrelevant for the average American who has seen nothing but higher prices, lower wages, astronomical interest rates, and unaffordable mortgage rates?
Answer the question.Huey » 19 Dec 2023, 8:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Ps. you should thank god you live in America. Your right to be stupid is protected in this country.
You don’t give a **** about anything but your own personal bottom line, old man.
On a real basis the lowest quintiles of wage earners are GAINING.Huey » 19 Dec 2023, 8:12 pm » wrote: ↑ On a real basis, **** idiot.
you arrogant elitist walk street dumbasses are so out of touch with Main Street it is incredible.
What is that ranking based on?Zeets2 » 19 Dec 2023, 6:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Here's a list of the top 10% of economic authors, where your idiot placed number 40.
I'd rely on any of them to follow before I believe a proven dunce like Krugman!
https://ideas.repec.org/top/top.person.all.html
How so?
Again, Wall Street, Main Street ain’t feeling your success. And your elitist arrogant *** doesn’t give a **** because you are profiting.R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 8:30 pm » wrote: ↑ On a real basis the lowest quintiles of wage earners are GAINING.
When was the last time NOMINAL prices fell?
Son, I **** own you on the forums, in real life issues, and on what it takes to be a man. Remember, daddy’s lil coward, I traveled over 600 miles to be in Boston for a few ball games.
You stopped 30 miles short?Huey » 19 Dec 2023, 8:45 pm » wrote: ↑ Son, I **** own you on the forums, in real life issues, and on what it takes to be a man. Remember, daddy’s lil coward, I traveled over 600 miles to be in Boston for a few ball games.
After all your threats, your braggart BS on how tough you are, less than 30 miles turned you into a ******. You aren’t **** as man, as your dad knew.
Im out. You know where to find me, ******. Now go change your depends. You got insurance?