Liberal Forum

R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm

There isn't a thing in the world you can "explain" to me.

oh, you're that **** stupid? duly noted....
 

ROG62 » 20 Dec 2023, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2023, 10:01 am

oh, you're that **** stupid? duly noted....

Rog,

Don't yap...you're a moron.
 

Z09 » 19 Dec 2023, 3:56 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 3:56 pm

Yep..

They all predicted a market collapse under Trump ..

MSM went balls out on that one in the weeks up to his inauguration...and just like everything else they pounded out in the media for the next 4 yrs, it fizzled like the drizzle dicks they were...
 

Zeets2 » 20 Dec 2023, 9:43 am » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2023, 9:43 am

You're just pissed because I kick your *** every time a dope like you chooses to engage me.

You were applauded by Tiny D. Bitter.

Tiny can't tell the difference between a factor and an order of magnitude. He doesn't know why he cries "3.5!".

He's a clinical imbecile.

If there's a rule about answering questions, post it....along with your stipulation to abide by it.

Then we can get started on your flensing...
 

ROG62 » 20 Dec 2023, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2023, 10:09 am

MSM went balls out on that one in the weeks up to his inauguration...and just like everything else they pounded out in the media for the next 4 yrs, it fizzled like the drizzle dicks they were...

So, when all was said and done, how did Grifty do?

By the numbers...
 

ROG62 » 20 Dec 2023, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2023, 9:59 am

The **** also cherry-picked one quarter during height of Covid lockdown as the "worst GDP evah!"

He tried to get away doing that with gas prices under Trump vs Biden. He does stupid **** like that. 

Vegas » 20 Dec 2023, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2023, 11:13 am

He tried to get away doing that with gas prices under Trump vs Biden. He does stupid **** like that. 

 

That was hilarious.  He isn't that bright. 

Huey » 20 Dec 2023, 11:25 am » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2023, 11:25 am

That was hilarious.  He isn't that bright.

I can't imagine living my life like him. 

Vegas » 20 Dec 2023, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2023, 11:31 am

I can't imagine living my life like him. 

 

Imagine having no friends, no wife or woman in your life, and living in a 5 story, 3,000 sq ft condo x.  Not really much space per floor.  
 

R.Suave » 20 Dec 2023, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2023, 10:29 am

You were applauded by Tiny D. Bitter.

Tiny can't tell the difference between a factor and an order of magnitude. He doesn't know why he cries "3.5!".

He's a clinical imbecile.

If there's a rule about answering questions, post it....along with your stipulation to abide by it.

Then we can get started on your flensing...

Speak English, son. Who or what the hell is Tiny D. Bitter and why should I care who applauds me?
I've answered your idiotic question about which economists I admire who are all far better than the idiot Krugman you swear by, no matter how many times he's proven wrong!

So naturally, it's time for you to change the subject rather than admit your own ignorance.
Guess nothing's changed by you acquiring a new name, huh?
Or were you trying to fool everyone here who has previously kicked your ignorant *** by coming up with a name that's even dumber than the last one?

Care to confirm that's the reason you felt it necessary to use a new pseudonym or are you admitting you took the new name off your shampoo bottle? 
 

Huey » 20 Dec 2023, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2023, 11:34 am

Imagine having no friends, no wife or woman in your life, and living in a 5 story, 3,000 sq ft condo x.  Not really much space per floor.

And blaming everybody else for your misery. 

Vegas » 20 Dec 2023, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2023, 11:31 am

I can't imagine living my life like him. 

 

I left out posting about 150 time a day.  202 last Friday.  

Huey » 20 Dec 2023, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2023, 11:36 am

I left out posting about 150 time a day.  202 last Friday.

And probably 95% of those posts were questions/demands. 

Zeets2 » 20 Dec 2023, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2023, 11:34 am

Speak English, son. Who or what the hell is Tiny D. Bitter and why should I care who applauds me?
I've answered your idiotic question about which economists I admire who are all far better than the idiot Krugman you swear by, no matter how many times he's proven wrong!

So naturally, it's time for you to change the subject rather than admit your own ignorance.
Guess nothing's changed by you acquiring a new name, huh?
Or were you trying to fool everyone here who has previously kicked your ignorant *** by coming up with a name that's even dumber than the last one?

Care to confirm that's the reason you felt it necessary to use a new pseudonym or are you admitting you took the new name off your shampoo bottle?

This is part of the problem.

Your tiny working vocabulary makes it a challenge to edify you.

If you can't demonstrate the truth of what you assert, don't assert it.

Now post the rule, your stipulation and let's get going...
 

ROG62 » 20 Dec 2023, 6:47 am » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2023, 6:47 am

swavee is the poster child for libtardothink 101...

Libtardothink 101
Black Veg thinks the USA would be a better place if all the Conservative White Men [who used to beat him up as a kid] were replaced with ****** and Spics [who also used to beat him up as a kid]


 

R.Suave » 20 Dec 2023, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2023, 11:38 am

This is part of the problem.

Your tiny working vocabulary makes it a challenge to edify you.

If you can't demonstrate the truth of what you assert, don't assert it.

Now post the rule, your stipulation and let's get going...

I've given you no "rules" that you need to follow, dickhead!
You asked for the economists that I think are better than your favorite idiot Krugman, and I gave you 4 of them that have been correct with far more regularity than the loser you genuflect before because you honor the useless and meaningless "prizes" your fawning liberal media anointed him with.

So explain your stupid reference to a Tiny D. Bitter, or are we expected to recognize what idiot pseudonym your cluttered brain creates from day to day here?

 

Zeets2 » 20 Dec 2023, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2023, 2:30 pm

I've given you no "rules" that you need to follow, dickhead!
You asked for the economists that I think are better than your favorite idiot Krugman, and I gave you 4 of them that have been correct with far more regularity than the loser you genuflect before because you honor the useless and meaningless "prizes" your fawning liberal media anointed him with.

So explain your stupid reference to a Tiny D. Bitter, or are we expected to recognize what idiot pseudonym your cluttered brain creates from day to day here?

and I gave you 4 of them that have been correct with far more regularity

I recall you giving me a link you said listed 40....but you had no idea what it was listing.

So explain your stupid reference to a Tiny D. Bitter

the ******* little loser who believes you..

R.Suave » 20 Dec 2023, 3:11 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2023, 3:11 pm

I recall you giving me a link you said listed 40....but you had no idea what it was listing.

the ******* little loser who believes you..

Apparently, you need to go back to school and study what it takes to increase your reading comprehension.
Stop in to any 4th grade English class and I'm confident they can help you in that regard.

I NEVER said the list I provide in a link listed only 40 economists.  I said that the idiot Krugman RANKED #40 on the list, indicating that there are at least 39 economists with better track records than your "expert", who has been wrong far more often than not.

And if you had a working brain, you'd know that about his failed history, even as you continue to be dumb enough to praise him with this initial post!
 

Zeets2 » 20 Dec 2023, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2023, 3:42 pm

Apparently, you need to go back to school and study what it takes to increase your reading comprehension.
Stop in to any 4th grade English class and I'm confident they can help you in that regard.

I NEVER said the list I provide in a link listed only 40 economists.  I said that the idiot Krugman RANKED #40 on the list, indicating that there are at least 39 economists with better track records than your "expert", who has been wrong far more often than not.

And if you had a working brain, you'd know that about his failed history, even as you continue to be dumb enough to praise him with this initial post!

4 or 39?

"Track records" or "frequency of citations"?

You have no clue one minute to the next...
 

R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 4:28 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 4:28 pm

I'm IN the underwear ads...

It's why @Huey  sleeps in the utility room.

I saw that RN!