Liberal Forum

R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 12:09 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 12:09 pm

I've been here before....it is why you are so bitter, remember?

Speaking of you being bitter. Is that why you come up with the same lie over and over? 


Here, I'll prove it. Watch this: 

Challenge. 
​​​​​​​1. Same lie.

Vegas » 19 Dec 2023, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 12:10 pm

Speaking of you being bitter. Is that why you come up with the same lie over and over? 

Here, I'll prove it. Watch this: 

Challenge. 
1. Same lie.

Post my lie.


Melt down.
 

R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 12:11 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 12:11 pm

Post my lie.

Melt down.

 You have already posted it 100 times. You know, the one where you claim I lost and that I agreed to your judges. 

But you know that already, don't you? 


Here, you will post it again. Watch: 
Challenge. 
​​​​​​​1. Same lie.  

Vegas » 19 Dec 2023, 12:12 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 12:12 pm

 You have already posted it 100 times. You know, the one where you claim I lost and that I agreed to your judges. 

But you know that already, don't you? 

Here, you will post it again. Watch: 
Challenge. 
1. Same lie.

Did you, or did you not, lose twice?

​​​​​​​

R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 2:21 pm

Did you, or did you not, lose twice?

 

You already know that is not true. Enough!

God man. 

Challenge
​​​​​​​1. Same lie...again. Over and over.

R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 10:59 am

No...it's my idea of gloating..

I've been telling you this for years...
all while you were convinced you were gonna be paying 7 bucks for gas.

Ask me why I ALWAYS get it right, while you're always lying, limbless, in a pool of your own waste.

So here you are gloating because Biden's War on our gasoline based economy caused gasoline to only hit $5 instead of $7...?
and Biden's War only caused building material prices to double...?


 

R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 8:43 am » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 8:43 am

VICTORY LAP!
Beware Economists Who Won’t Admit They Were Wrong
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/18/opin ... mists.html

From an economic point of view, 2023 will go down in the record books as one of the best years ever — a year in which inflation came down amazingly fast at no visible cost, defying the predictions of many economists that disinflation would require years of high unemployment....

How amazing has the economy been? As recently as March, the Federal Reserve committee that sets monetary policy projected that we’d end this year with 4.5 percent unemployment and with the Fed’s preferred “core” measure of inflation running at 3.6 percent. Last week, the same group projected year-end unemployment of only 3.8 percent and core inflation at only 3.2 percent. But actually the news is even better, because that last number is inflation for the year as a whole; over the six months ending in October, core inflation was running at 2.5 percent, and most analysts I follow believe that when November data come in later this week, it will show inflation down to around 2 percent, which is the Fed’s long-run target.

"Nooooooooo......7....6....3.5!"

In a rational universe this would occasion a Silence of The Influencers...where they fall, by the herd, never to be heard again.

But that grossly misunderestimates the vast Reservoir of Credulity and Innumeracy that is The Angry White Man and The Hole who serves him.

Not so fast ....

As the clock ticks closer to 2024, one outspoken economist is making a dire predication about the markets in the new year. "Since 2009, this has been 100% artificial, unprecedented money printing and deficits; $27 trillion over 15 years, to be exact. This is off the charts, 100% artificial, which means we're in a dangerous state," Harry Dent told Fox News Digital. "I think 2024 is going to be the biggest single crash year we'll see in our lifetimes.""I'm the guy that's praying for a crash while everybody else is not. We need to get back down to normal, and we need to send a message to central banks," he continued. "This should be a lesson I don't think we'll ever revisit. I don't think we'll ever see a bubble for any of our lifetimes again."Dent, who spent the majority of his career analyzing proprietary research, credited his against-the-grain prediction to overvalued markets and excessive stimulus spending. While recent rallies have overwhelmingly provided investors with mild recession expectations, Dent remained firm that an "everything bubble" will burst next year.Historically, market bubbles are characterized by a rapid rise in stock prices, before being met by a sharp fall.

 https://www.foxbusiness.com/media/us-ec ... h-lifetime
 
 

Majik » 19 Dec 2023, 2:34 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 2:34 pm

Not so fast ....

As the clock ticks closer to 2024, one outspoken economist is making a dire predication about the markets in the new year. "Since 2009, this has been 100% artificial, unprecedented money printing and deficits; $27 trillion over 15 years, to be exact. This is off the charts, 100% artificial, which means we're in a dangerous state," Harry Dent told Fox News Digital. "I think 2024 is going to be the biggest single crash year we'll see in our lifetimes.""I'm the guy that's praying for a crash while everybody else is not. We need to get back down to normal, and we need to send a message to central banks," he continued. "This should be a lesson I don't think we'll ever revisit. I don't think we'll ever see a bubble for any of our lifetimes again."Dent, who spent the majority of his career analyzing proprietary research, credited his against-the-grain prediction to overvalued markets and excessive stimulus spending. While recent rallies have overwhelmingly provided investors with mild recession expectations, Dent remained firm that an "everything bubble" will burst next year.Historically, market bubbles are characterized by a rapid rise in stock prices, before being met by a sharp fall.

 https://www.foxbusiness.com/media/us-ec ... h-lifetime

I saw a similiar article at the NYPost. Prolly the same one. 

Majik » 19 Dec 2023, 2:34 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 2:34 pm

Not so fast ....

As the clock ticks closer to 2024, one outspoken economist is making a dire predication about the markets in the new year. "Since 2009, this has been 100% artificial, unprecedented money printing and deficits; $27 trillion over 15 years, to be exact. This is off the charts, 100% artificial, which means we're in a dangerous state," Harry Dent told Fox News Digital. "I think 2024 is going to be the biggest single crash year we'll see in our lifetimes.""I'm the guy that's praying for a crash while everybody else is not. We need to get back down to normal, and we need to send a message to central banks," he continued. "This should be a lesson I don't think we'll ever revisit. I don't think we'll ever see a bubble for any of our lifetimes again."Dent, who spent the majority of his career analyzing proprietary research, credited his against-the-grain prediction to overvalued markets and excessive stimulus spending. While recent rallies have overwhelmingly provided investors with mild recession expectations, Dent remained firm that an "everything bubble" will burst next year.Historically, market bubbles are characterized by a rapid rise in stock prices, before being met by a sharp fall.

 https://www.foxbusiness.com/media/us-ec ... h-lifetime

"Economist"?

This guy sucks.

• His 2011 book goes on to suggest consumer spending will begin to plummet in 2012 with the Dow bottoming out somewhere between 3,000 and 5,600 in 2014. After hitting bottom, stocks will experience a mini-rally in 2015–2017 before falling into a final bottom during the 2019–2023 period, when the 45–50 age group troughs because the U.S. birth rate reached its own low in 1973.[6]

• Larry Swedroe, writing for CBS Money Watch asks, "Why do people listen to Harry Dent in light of his obvious inability to accurately predict the future?"[14]
•  
• Marketwatch Columnist Chuck Jaffe opines that, tell "people what they want to hear, and they will flock to your door."[15]

 

Huey » 19 Dec 2023, 2:36 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 2:36 pm

I saw a similiar article at the NYPost. Prolly the same one.

Gee...you think it is a coincidence?
 

GHETTOBLASTER » 19 Dec 2023, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 2:31 pm

So here you are gloating because Biden's War on our gasoline based economy caused gasoline to only hit $5 instead of $7...?
and Biden's War only caused building material prices to double...?

We are pumping more oil now than ever.

Do you understand?
 

R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 2:41 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 2:41 pm

Gee...you think it is a coincidence?

Don't really care.    

Just shows you can shop for whatever opinion you want. 

Vegas » 19 Dec 2023, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 2:22 pm

You already know that is not true. Enough!

God man. 

Challenge
1. Same lie...again. Over and over.

If you didn't lose, why do you screech about judges?
​​​​​​​

Huey » 19 Dec 2023, 2:44 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 2:44 pm

Don't really care.    

Just shows you can shop for whatever opinion you want.

You're a **** idiot..

• On December 10, 2016, Dent predicted that the Dow Jones Industrial average could fall 17,000 points as a result of Donald Trump's election win. Less than two weeks later, Dent reversed his opinion and thinks there is short term growth for the US stock market, but demographic forces will keep the economic growth stagnant in the longer term.[11]

 

R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 2:43 pm

Do you understand?

You just can't do one **** post without hiding. You can't do it. You always have to hide behind a question. 

R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 2:43 pm

We are pumping more oil now than ever.

Do you understand?

DAMAGE CONTROL MODE..!!!
Do you understand...?.
 The damage has already been done
 

R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 2:44 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 2:44 pm

If you didn't lose, why do you screech about judges?
 

You already know the answer to that. Enough of your **** hiding. 

Challenge. 
​​​​​​​1. Same lie. 

R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 2:43 pm

We are pumping more oil now than ever.

Do you understand?

Many analysts and industry officials said that the record production stems mostly from market forces and innovation in extracting more crude, which was driven by the Covid-19-induced oil bust, not Biden’s actions. Even so, policies — including those from the current administration — play a role in driving production, although the results of those rules and regulations can often lag by months or years, they said.
 “You really saw a large increase in our measure of productivity, barrels of oil equivalent per foot drilled, increase even more during the pandemic,” said Jason Brown, vice president and economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, about why production is so high.Similarly, Dustin Meyer, vice president of policy, economic and regulatory affairs at the American Petroleum Institute, said to understand the market now, look back to late 2019, when oil production reached its all-time peak of 12.3 million barrels a day just before the pandemic.

 When gasoline prices crashed and briefly went into negative territory during the pandemic, companies worked to turn their spigots off except for their most productive wells. That created a need to squeeze more oil out of fewer wells with less resources and fewer workers.The reduced number of active wells led to changes in how operators got oil out of the ground, Brown said.

https://www.eenews.net/articles/oil-pro ... -to-biden/

R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 2:45 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 2:45 pm

You're a **** idiot..

• On December 10, 2016, Dent predicted that the Dow Jones Industrial average could fall 17,000 points as a result of Donald Trump's election win. Less than two weeks later, Dent reversed his opinion and thinks there is short term growth for the US stock market, but demographic forces will keep the economic growth stagnant in the longer term.[11]

That's nice.  

One of the nation’s leading doomsayers has been the New York Times’ perpetually mistaken Paul Krugman, who warned shortly after the 2016 election that Trump’s victory would trigger a global recession “with no end in sight.” We could file that under “post-election hysteria,” but as late as April of this year he was still telling crowds that the bond-market signals predicted “a pretty good chance of a recession sometime in the next year or so.” And he has kept this going all year:February 11: Paul Krugman expects a global recession this year, warns “we don’t have an effective response.”August 1: “Why Was Trumponomics a Flop?”August 15: “From Trump Boom to Trump Gloom”September 5: “Trumpism Is Bad for Business”October 3: “Here Comes the Trump Slump”October 24: “The Day the Trump Boom Died”A couple of weeks after the Trump Boom expired, CNBC reported that “October job creation comes in at 128,000, easily topping estimates even with GM auto strike.” This cycle has been going on for three years.

https://news.yahoo.com/paul-krugman-alw ... 30058.html
 

Huey » 19 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm

That's nice.  

One of the nation’s leading doomsayers has been the New York Times’ perpetually mistaken Paul Krugman, who warned shortly after the 2016 election that Trump’s victory would trigger a global recession “with no end in sight.” We could file that under “post-election hysteria,” but as late as April of this year he was still telling crowds that the bond-market signals predicted “a pretty good chance of a recession sometime in the next year or so.” And he has kept this going all year:February 11: Paul Krugman expects a global recession this year, warns “we don’t have an effective response.”August 1: “Why Was Trumponomics a Flop?”August 15: “From Trump Boom to Trump Gloom”September 5: “Trumpism Is Bad for Business”October 3: “Here Comes the Trump Slump”October 24: “The Day the Trump Boom Died”A couple of weeks after the Trump Boom expired, CNBC reported that “October job creation comes in at 128,000, easily topping estimates even with GM auto strike.” This cycle has been going on for three years.

https://news.yahoo.com/paul-krugman-alw ... 30058.html

But Trumponomics WAS a flop.