Liberal Forum

Zeets2 » 21 Dec 2023, 9:17 am » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 9:17 am

I see.  So you DENY that Krugman has repeatedly been wrong on almost all current issues?
Guess you'd rather not answer and instead prefer to throw up a white flag of surrender, huh?

He is just looking for attention.  

Zeets2 » 21 Dec 2023, 9:17 am » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 9:17 am

I see.  So you DENY that Krugman has repeatedly been wrong on almost all current issues?
Guess you'd rather not answer and instead prefer to throw up a white flag of surrender, huh?

Yes, I deny that.

Nod.

Do you deny that you are too stupid to have any idea?

Guess you'd rather not answer and instead prefer to throw up a white flag of surrender, huh?
 

R.Suave » 21 Dec 2023, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 9:36 am

Yes, I deny that.

Nod.

Do you deny that you are too stupid to have any idea?

Guess you'd rather not answer and instead prefer to throw up a white flag of surrender, huh?

Guess you never tire of getting your nose rubbed in it, do you?
So tell us, genius:
Where was the "a global recession with no end in sight" that Krugman proclaimed would happen if Trump were elected?
Where is the evidence that "impeaching Trump is good for the economy" with a corrupt and senile Biden taking the country into a recession?
How do you explain Krugman's statement that "neither tax cuts or tariffs are working" despite the booming economy that Trump gave us prior to Covid?

“More Business Investment, More Growth, More Wages”: Trump Was Right on Tax Cuts, According To Top Economists
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets ... s-AA1jYpVU

Gee, I wonder why those "Top Economists" didn't include Krugman and his own stupidity?
Could it be that he's not included in the list of top economists, as you so ignorantly believe?

From Trump Boom to Trump Gloom
The smart money thinks Trumponomics is a flop.NY Times by Paul Krugman Aug. 15, 2019
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/15/opin ... onomy.html

And did you believe Krugman's assessment that the "smart money" thought Trumponomics was a flop, despite all the evidence of the economic boom he created?
Or are you ready to admit that Krugman may very well have been the worst economist of our time while proving to be nothing more than a Democrat shill?
 
How many more examples of his stupidity (and yours) will it take to convince you?
 

R. » wrote:

29 Jan 1970, 2:09 am

VICTORY LAP!
Beware Economists Who Won’t Admit They Were Wrong
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/18/opin ... mists.html


From an economic point of view, 2023 will go down in the record books as one of the best years ever — a year in which inflation came down amazingly fast at no visible cost, defying the predictions of many economists that disinflation would require years of high unemployment....


How amazing has the economy been? As recently as March, the Federal Reserve committee that sets monetary policy projected that we’d end this year with 4.5 percent unemployment and with the Fed’s preferred “core” measure of inflation running at 3.6 percent. Last week, the same group projected year-end unemployment of only 3.8 percent and core inflation at only 3.2 percent. But actually the news is even better, because that last number is inflation for the year as a whole; over the six months ending in October, core inflation was running at 2.5 percent, and most analysts I follow believe that when November data come in later this week, it will show inflation down to around 2 percent, which is the Fed’s long-run target.



"Nooooooooo......7....6....3.5!"


In a rational universe this would occasion a Silence of The Influencers...where they fall, by the herd, never to be heard again.

But that grossly misunderestimates the vast Reservoir of Credulity and Innumeracy that is The Angry White Man and The Hole who serves him.


 

 

 

Vegas » 13 Feb 2024, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑

13 Feb 2024, 11:21 am

R.Suave » 13 Feb 2024, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑

13 Feb 2024, 11:11 am

https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=82655

https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=83076

https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=83219

https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=83240

https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=83266

I could go on....

**** idiot,.

They were all copy/pasted links with just some immature commentary. None of those were thoughts of your own. None. Not **** one. 

Not.A.Single.One. 


But please, yes, go on...Try again. Coward. 

 

Didn't you predict $7 gasoline?

R.Suave » 13 Feb 2024, 2:36 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Feb 2024, 2:36 pm

Didn't you predict $7 gasoline?

You posted more copy/pasted ****. Just as I predicted. 100% accuracy again. 

Watch more of my accuracy. Ready? You will continue to copy/paste ****. Probably creep through my profile. No thoughts of your own.

And go....

R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 8:43 am » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 8:43 am

VICTORY LAP!
Beware Economists Who Won’t Admit They Were Wrong
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/18/opin ... mists.html

From an economic point of view, 2023 will go down in the record books as one of the best years ever — a year in which inflation came down amazingly fast at no visible cost, defying the predictions of many economists that disinflation would require years of high unemployment....

How amazing has the economy been? As recently as March, the Federal Reserve committee that sets monetary policy projected that we’d end this year with 4.5 percent unemployment and with the Fed’s preferred “core” measure of inflation running at 3.6 percent. Last week, the same group projected year-end unemployment of only 3.8 percent and core inflation at only 3.2 percent. But actually the news is even better, because that last number is inflation for the year as a whole; over the six months ending in October, core inflation was running at 2.5 percent, and most analysts I follow believe that when November data come in later this week, it will show inflation down to around 2 percent, which is the Fed’s long-run target.

"Nooooooooo......7....6....3.5!"

In a rational universe this would occasion a Silence of The Influencers...where they fall, by the herd, never to be heard again.

But that grossly misunderestimates the vast Reservoir of Credulity and Innumeracy that is The Angry White Man and The Hole who serves him.

 

• Stock market today: Dow falls 700 points after inflation cools less than anticipated
• Inflation: Consumer prices rise 3.1% in January, defying forecasts

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/stock-ma ... 31991.html

There's your Bidenomics at work for you, R.Slob.
 
 

Victory Lap!

A comprehensive list of 2023 & 2024 tech layoffs

Last year’s tech-wide reckoning continues. The tech industry has seen more than 240,000 jobs lost in 2023, a total that’s already 50% higher than last year and growing. Earlier this year, mass workforce reductions were driven by the biggest names in tech like Google, Amazon, Microsoft, Yahoo, Meta and Zoom. Startups across many sectors also announced cutbacks through the first half of the year. And while tech layoffs slowed down in the summer and fall, it appears that cuts are ramping up yet again.

https://techcrunch.com/2024/02/12/tech- ... 2023-list/
 

Skans » 13 Feb 2024, 2:42 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Feb 2024, 2:42 pm

• Stock market today: Dow falls 700 points after inflation cools less than anticipated
• Inflation: Consumer prices rise 3.1% in January, defying forecasts

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/stock-ma ... 31991.html

There's your Bidenomics at work for you, R.Slob.

Leaving it up only 4% for the year.....mid feb.

RedheadedStranger » 13 Feb 2024, 2:46 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Feb 2024, 2:46 pm

Victory Lap!

A comprehensive list of 2023 & 2024 tech layoffs

Last year’s tech-wide reckoning continues. The tech industry has seen more than 240,000 jobs lost in 2023, a total that’s already 50% higher than last year and growing. Earlier this year, mass workforce reductions were driven by the biggest names in tech like Google, Amazon, Microsoft, Yahoo, Meta and Zoom. Startups across many sectors also announced cutbacks through the first half of the year. And while tech layoffs slowed down in the summer and fall, it appears that cuts are ramping up yet again.

https://techcrunch.com/2024/02/12/tech- ... 2023-list/

Are fewer Americans working?

R.Suave » 13 Feb 2024, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Feb 2024, 2:47 pm

Are fewer Americans working?

In the tech sector, for sure.


 

RedheadedStranger » 13 Feb 2024, 2:49 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Feb 2024, 2:49 pm

In the tech sector, for sure.

Are fewer Americans working?
 

R.Suave » 13 Feb 2024, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Feb 2024, 2:50 pm

Are fewer Americans working?

Trading a programmer's position at Google for two part time jobs at Kroger and Logan's ain't exactly a step in the right direction Rico.

 
 

RedheadedStranger » 13 Feb 2024, 2:53 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Feb 2024, 2:53 pm

Trading a programmer's position at Google for two part time jobs at Kroger and Logan's ain't exactly a step in the right direction Rico.

Link?

R.Suave » 13 Feb 2024, 2:54 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Feb 2024, 2:54 pm

Link?

If you would leave your condo every once in a while and venture out in the real world you would see it with your own eyes.

 
 

RedheadedStranger » 13 Feb 2024, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Feb 2024, 3:03 pm

If you would leave your condo every once in a while and venture out in the real world you would see it with your own eyes.

I have also noticed more people in their late 50s and 60s working grocery stores.  

RedheadedStranger » 13 Feb 2024, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Feb 2024, 3:03 pm

If you would leave your condo every once in a while and venture out in the real world you would see it with your own eyes.

You can see the Silicon Valley from Tennessee, Moosebait?

R.Suave » 13 Feb 2024, 3:14 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Feb 2024, 3:14 pm

You can see the Silicon Valley from Tennessee, Moosebait?

There ain't no Moose in TN Rico... except maybe in the zoo.

R.Suave » 13 Feb 2024, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Feb 2024, 2:47 pm

Leaving it up only 4% for the year.....mid feb.

The crash is upon us.  Bidenomics.  Boy, are people really going to hate the corrupt old geezer now!