Liberal Forum

R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 2:53 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 2:53 pm

But Trumponomics WAS a flop.

No, COVID and State Governors helped it flop.  

Carry on.  

Huey » 19 Dec 2023, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 2:55 pm

No, COVID and State Governors helped it flop.  

Carry on.

@Z09  and I already explained that to him. His response was that it was all just a coincidence that Covid hit during that time.       

Vegas » 19 Dec 2023, 2:56 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 2:56 pm

@Z09  and I already explained that to him. His response was that it was all just a coincidence that Covid hit during that time.       

 

We have been explaining that for years.  He really melts down when he gleefully posts about the worst quarter of GDP and you point out that in the very next quarter all those loses were made up and then some.  

Huey » 19 Dec 2023, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 2:57 pm

We have been explaining that for years.  He really melts down when he gleefully posts about the worst quarter of GDP and you point out that in the very next quarter all those loses were made up and then some.

Why does he set himself up for this ****? It's almost like he enjoys getting a beat down.

Huey » 19 Dec 2023, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 2:55 pm

No, COVID and State Governors helped it flop.  

Carry on.

No...it generated fewer jobs and only marginally higher growth....in spite of doubling the deficit.

Vegas » 19 Dec 2023, 2:59 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 2:59 pm

Why does he set himself up for this ****? It's almost like he enjoys getting a beat down.

 

Because he is a senior citizen with no friends or close family in his life.  

Huey » 19 Dec 2023, 3:02 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 3:02 pm

Because he is a senior citizen with no friends or close family in his life.

Well at least he is consistent...!


 

Huey » 19 Dec 2023, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 2:57 pm

We have been explaining that for years.  He really melts down when he gleefully posts about the worst quarter of GDP and you point out that in the very next quarter all those loses were made up and then some.

We have been explaining that for years

There isn't a thing in the world you can "explain" to me.

Vegas » 19 Dec 2023, 2:56 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 2:56 pm

@Z09  and I already explained that to him. His response was that it was all just a coincidence that Covid hit during that time.     

There isn't a **** thing either of you two idiots could explain to me..
 

R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm

There isn't a thing in the world you can "explain" to me.

No one can explain anything to you.  In order to understand what people are explaining to you one has to have a basic capacity to comprehend it.  

R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 3:10 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 3:10 pm

There isn't a **** thing either of you two idiots could explain to me..

I know that.  I really got that understanding in the firearm debates.  You are just to STOOPID to learn or understand what you are citing. 

Huey » 19 Dec 2023, 3:11 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 3:11 pm

No one can explain anything to you.  In order to understand what people are explaining to you one has to have a basic capacity to comprehend it.

Like "3.5"?

Why do you presume?

Do you doubt that you're an idiot?
 

Huey » 19 Dec 2023, 3:12 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 3:12 pm

I know that.  I really got that understanding in the firearm debates.  You are just to STOOPID to learn or understand what you are citing.

The one you've lost repeatedly?



 

R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 3:12 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 3:12 pm

Like "3.5"?

Why do you presume?

Do you doubt that you're an idiot?

       

You started this thread to suck up to Krugman and rah rah Biden, claiming how wrong others can be when an opposing view was posted.  Come to find out Krugman has been wrong like they are.

As I said, one can can shop for whatever opinion suits them.  

R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 3:13 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 3:13 pm

The one you've lost repeatedly?



 

 

I never lost those.  Bu tI had a blast watching you dig your hole deeper and deeper. 

R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 3:10 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 3:10 pm

There isn't a **** thing either of you two idiots could explain to me..

That's because there isn't a thing that you could possibly understand. 

Challenge
1. Same lies

Huey » 19 Dec 2023, 3:14 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 3:14 pm

       

You started this thread to suck up to Krugman and rah rah Biden, claiming how wrong others can be when an opposing view was posted.  Come to find out Krugman has been wrong like they are.

As I said, one can can shop for whatever opinion suits them.

No, I didn't.

I did it, literally, to piss in your collective eyes.

You've learned nothing from your 6.5 year losing streak, even though you've buried numerous influencers.

You've had EVERY BIT of this completely wrong for 2 years...and yet you STILL start your day with Drudge and NYPost, and end it with FOX.

You're squarely in the Unrepentant Imbecile demographic.
 

Vegas » 19 Dec 2023, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 3:15 pm

That's because there isn't a thing that you could possibly understand. 

Challenge
1. Same lies

Define "Survivorship bias" and explain how it was named that.

R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 3:19 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 3:19 pm

No, I didn't.

I did it, literally, to piss in your collective eyes.

You've learned nothing from your 6.5 year losing streak, even though you've buried numerous influencers.

You've had EVERY BIT of this completely wrong for 2 years...and yet you STILL start your day with Drudge and NYPost, and end it with FOX.

You're squarely in the Unrepentant Imbecile demographic.
 

 

Well apparently, you wasted your time.  
 

R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 3:21 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 3:21 pm

Define "Survivorship bias" and explain how it was named that.

This one is on you. Don't be turning this **** on me you God damn coward. 

Define it! Now!


Challenge
1. Same lies.