Liberal Forum

Vegas » 19 Dec 2023, 3:28 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 3:28 pm

This one is on you. Don't be turning this **** on me you God damn coward. 

Define it! Now!

Challenge
1. Same lies.

I already have..

Show me some "thought".



















 

Huey » 19 Dec 2023, 3:23 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 3:23 pm

Well apparently, you wasted your time.

apparently

To whom?

When did your 2022 recession end, Tiny?
 

R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 3:32 pm

I already have..

Show me some "thought".

    Nope. Another lie. 

Here comes another lie....and another ....and another....


Challenge
1. Same lies

I read one of Paul Krugman's books. it was a hard read. I was expecting something that actually dealt with economics. Not even close. It was just a bunch of whining about the Bush tax cuts.

Vegas » 19 Dec 2023, 3:41 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 3:41 pm

    Nope. Another lie. 

Here comes another lie....and another ....and another....

Challenge
1. Same lies

Ok...you can't show me "thought"..

I didn't think so.
 

R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 3:43 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 3:43 pm

Ok...you can't show me "thought"..

I didn't think so.

Your projecting and lies never work. Why do you still use the same tactics that fail over and over?

impartialobserver » 19 Dec 2023, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 3:42 pm

I read one of Paul Krugman's books. it was a hard read. I was expecting something that actually dealt with economics. Not even close. It was just a bunch of whining about the Bush tax cuts.

Perhaps the problem wasn't Paul.

https://www.businessinsider.com/david-f ... ht-2011-10

Few economists have been more correct about the economic crisis of the last several years than the proudly liberal Paul Krugman.
 

Vegas » 19 Dec 2023, 3:45 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 3:45 pm

Your projecting and lies never work. Why do you still use the same tactics that fail over and over?

Then show me "thought" and make a liar out of me...

I can show your Stupid...in your own words.

R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 3:50 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 3:50 pm

Then show me "thought" and make a liar out of me...

I can show your Stupid...in your own words.

I have many times. Your response is always one of the following:
1. Strikethroughs without reading a word
2. Read only the first 4 words, then you make an *** of yourself for it. 


And you are already a liar. No need for me to show it again.

Challenge
1. Same lies

Vegas » 19 Dec 2023, 3:52 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 3:52 pm

I have many times. Your response is always one of the following:
1. Strikethroughs without reading a word
2. Read only the first 4 words, then you make an *** of yourself for it. 

And you are already a liar. No need for me to show it again.

Challenge
1. Same lies

There is...because you lie.

Would you like to see your stupid....again?
 

R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 3:49 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 3:49 pm

Perhaps the problem wasn't Paul.

https://www.businessinsider.com/david-f ... ht-2011-10

Few economists have been more correct about the economic crisis of the last several years than the proudly liberal Paul Krugman.

I have a phd in economics and so am adept at reading scholarly economic articles. The Great Unraveling.. was not scholarly in the least. Page after page that said the same thing.. Bush tax cuts are bad. Ok, I get it.. I kept hoping that he would say something else. Well, it never did. 

R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 3:53 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 3:53 pm

There is...because you lie.

Would you like to see your stupid....again?

You mean the media comment that you can't debunk? 

 

Vegas » 19 Dec 2023, 3:56 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 3:56 pm

You mean the media comment that you can't debunk? 

I have and continue to be able to.

But no....your "math"...

I swear....
 

Z09 » 19 Dec 2023, 3:56 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 3:56 pm

Yep..

They all predicted a market collapse under Trump ..

I made a ton when it did....

R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 3:58 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 3:58 pm

I have and continue to be able to.

But no....your "math"...

I swear....

More projection.   

This fool can't figure out that if a number is below a linear change, the it's going to be far more below an exponential one.             

impartialobserver » 19 Dec 2023, 3:55 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 3:55 pm

I have a phd in economics and so am adept at reading scholarly economic articles. The Great Unraveling.. was not scholarly in the least. Page after page that said the same thing.. Bush tax cuts are bad. Ok, I get it.. I kept hoping that he would say something else. Well, it never did.

As a PhD in Economics, can you quantify the long term fiscal effects of the W years?


 

Vegas » 19 Dec 2023, 4:00 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 4:00 pm

More projection.   

This fool can't figure out that if a number is below a linear change, the it's going to be far more below an exponential one.           

Instead of heaping gibberish upon gibberish, why don't you quote from the original?

R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 4:01 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 4:01 pm

As a PhD in Economics, can you quantify the long term fiscal effects of the W years?

That is going to take more than the 3 seconds that you are expecting. Been just a day or two since those days and have moved on to other ventures. The Phd got me the job but the job has become more computer programming than economic analysis. 

R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 4:03 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 4:03 pm

Instead of heaping gibberish upon gibberish, why don't you quote from the original?

Why don't you? Do your own **** work.

R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 3:33 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 3:33 pm

To whom?

When did your 2022 recession end, Tiny?

Go find one of those old threads and figure out, Capt Diverto.