You seem to have a chronic problem with premature ejaculation.

Cedar » 20 Dec 2023, 4:46 pm » wrote: ↑ You seem to have a chronic problem with premature ejaculation.

Hey, it's as if it never happened.popscott » 20 Dec 2023, 5:30 pm » wrote: ↑ Sorry lefty..... you are being played again... nothing like the OP to start drooling before it is over.. You seem to have left out page 9..
Thanks to the Last Refuge who can break it down for you..
https://theconservativetreehouse.co...-at-they-even-admit-it-on-page-9/#more-253983
https://www.courts.state.co.us/user...ation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2023/23SA300.pdf
page 9....
As long as President Trump appeals the decision to the Supreme Court, the appeals court stays their own ruling – essentially indefinitely. The Colorado primary ballots printed, and the primary election will be over, before the Supreme Court puts this on their docket.
In addition to the virtual guarantee the high court will overrule this political nonsense, SCOTUS can make the entire issue moot before them by following their own normal schedule for submissions, arguments, deliberation and opinions delivered by the court.
The Colorado appellate court knows this, that’s why they put this self-stay into their 4-3 ruling. It’s a politically correct way of giving the optics of telling their tribe, ‘hey we’re with you,’ without the ramifications of the political backlash. In other words, psychological lawfare stuff – intended for media consumption.
Who told you, Hole?Z09 » 20 Dec 2023, 5:43 pm » wrote: ↑ You know this will be overturned right?
You'll be reminded when it happens
-------------------------------------------------------------
Answer the question, HoleZ09 » 20 Dec 2023, 5:52 pm » wrote: ↑ It's going to be overruled.
And it should...
A few Democrats on a court decides who the people in Colorado can vote for?
Z09 » 20 Dec 2023, 5:58 pm » wrote: ↑ So..
Trump has never been charged
Trump had never been convicted
But a couple Democrats decide he can't be on the ballot...
Imagine...
Someone accuses Biden of a crime and he's taken off the ballot..
Watch how this is over turned
A Democrat just came out and said this was a huge mistake.....and would be a disaster for the country
Warcok » 20 Dec 2023, 6:11 pm » wrote: ↑ I can't wait for SCOTUS to shove this up Colorado's *** so I can hear the left scream how SCOTUS is alt-right, MAGA, bought off, doing Trump's bidding!
Around noon, the president-elect recites the following oath, in accordance with Article II, Section I of the U.S. Constitution:"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God."
on the grounds that the president is not an officer??????????
Around noon, the president-elect recites the following oath, in accordance with Article II, Section I of the U.S. Constitution:"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God."
Z09 » 20 Dec 2023, 8:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Where's the charges and conviction?
So 4 Democrats made up their minds for the people of Colorado
You know this will be overturned..
Z09 » 20 Dec 2023, 8:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Where's the charges and conviction?
So 4 Democrats made up their minds for the people of Colorado
You know this will be overturned..
for 5 hours you all were saying the president was not an officer and that is what his lawyer said, just goes to show you how dumb his lawyers are.Z09 » 20 Dec 2023, 8:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Where's the charges and conviction?
So 4 Democrats made up their minds for the people of Colorado
You know this will be overturned..
R.Suave » 20 Dec 2023, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑ Just ONE occasion where you didn't find yourself blinded by a stream of my urine....
DeezerShoove » 20 Dec 2023, 9:06 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't know what the **** that even means.
So, I reduced you to babbling inanities. My work is done...![]()
Let's stop. You suck. I don't.
Bye.
Is it your position that Trump was rebelling against himself, Are you aware how stupid you sound?jerrab » 20 Dec 2023, 5:50 pm » wrote: ↑ -------------------------------------------------------------
Section 3 of the Civil War-era 14th Amendment says: “No person shall ... hold any office, civil or military, under the United States ... who, having previously taken an oath ... as an officer of the United States ... to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion .
Lefty? You must be new here and rather stupid.popscott » 20 Dec 2023, 5:30 pm » wrote: ↑ Sorry lefty..... you are being played again... nothing like the OP to start drooling before it is over.. You seem to have left out page 9..
Thanks to the Last Refuge who can break it down for you..
https://theconservativetreehouse.co...-at-they-even-admit-it-on-page-9/#more-253983
https://www.courts.state.co.us/user...ation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2023/23SA300.pdf
page 9....
As long as President Trump appeals the decision to the Supreme Court, the appeals court stays their own ruling – essentially indefinitely. The Colorado primary ballots printed, and the primary election will be over, before the Supreme Court puts this on their docket.
In addition to the virtual guarantee the high court will overrule this political nonsense, SCOTUS can make the entire issue moot before them by following their own normal schedule for submissions, arguments, deliberation and opinions delivered by the court.
The Colorado appellate court knows this, that’s why they put this self-stay into their 4-3 ruling. It’s a politically correct way of giving the optics of telling their tribe, ‘hey we’re with you,’ without the ramifications of the political backlash. In other words, psychological lawfare stuff – intended for media consumption.