Liberal Forum

Zeets2 » 21 Dec 2023, 12:21 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 12:21 pm

Start with the FACT that every American is innocent until proven guilty.
Then go the the FACT that under the 6th Amendment, he must be confronted with witnesses against him and be provided with the opportunity to supply his own witnesses in his defense.  How about the FACT that under the 14th Amendment, no state shall make or enforce ANY law (as Colorado has done) which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States?

On a side note, it's always great to see ignorant liberals like yourself who have jumped with glee at each attempt to criminalize anything that Trump has done, only to have their hopes dashed and be completely crushed with dismay when their failed efforts have worked against them and have actually INCREASED the amount of support Trump has always gained!

My guess is that we'll soon see you out on a ledge somewhere when the Supreme Court does it to you again in the coming weeks.

Start with the FACT that every American is innocent until proven guilty

Duh.

Then go the the FACT that under the 6th Amendment, he must be confronted with witnesses against him

Irrelevant.

He isn't being convicted...

And conviction is not required for disqualification.

You should stop presuming you know more than Colorado justices.
 

Z09 » 21 Dec 2023, 12:05 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 12:05 pm

Not an answer...
Try again..

Should 4 judges decide if a Democrat should be on a ballot?

also democrats would not even consider nominating someone who tried to take over the government.

R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 6:21 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023, 6:21 pm

Colorado tells Grifty to get off its lawn!

This is Veghead's idea of intelligent deep thinking thoughts ^^^

       


Challenge.
1. Same lies.

Vegas » 21 Dec 2023, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 12:26 pm

This is Veghead's idea of intelligent deep thinking thoughts ^^^

       

Challenge.
1. Same lies.

I challenge you to post some of your "thoughts"
 

R.Suave » 21 Dec 2023, 12:27 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 12:27 pm

I challenge you to post some of your "thoughts"

I would say about 85% of all my posts are my own thoughts. Go back to other threads and you will see. 


Sure, I post trolling crap at times, but that's how it is here. We all do. 

Challenge.
1. Same lies.

R.Suave » 21 Dec 2023, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 12:08 pm

If Grifty failed to follow the rules and disqualified himself, Grifty Cultists need to ask themselves serious questions.

Irrelevant.

You'll soon be smacked upside your nappy head when the Supreme Court finds that a state DOES NOT have the right to disqualify a candidate who has committed no crime!

But I guess you must enjoy being so humbled.  Next time, why not just visit your dominatrix and ask for the spanking you richly deserve?

 

R.Suave » 21 Dec 2023, 12:25 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 12:25 pm

Duh.

Irrelevant.

He isn't being convicted...

And conviction is not required for disqualification.

You should stop presuming you know more than Colorado justices.

When the Supreme Court overturns this absurd decision, it will be very clear that I DO know more than those idiot Democrat justices!
 

Zeets2 » 21 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm

When the Supreme Court overturns this absurd decision, it will be very clear that I DO know more than those idiot Democrat justices!

Only if you predicted the grounds on which they might do so.

But you have no idea of the Law.
 

Zeets2 » 21 Dec 2023, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 12:29 pm

You'll soon be smacked upside your nappy head when the Supreme Court finds that a state DOES NOT have the right to disqualify a candidate who has committed no crime!

But I guess you must enjoy being so humbled.  Next time, why not just visit your dominatrix and ask for the spanking you richly deserve?

Zeet,

You don't understand the issues...being listed on the ballot is not a "right".


 

R.Suave » 21 Dec 2023, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 12:35 pm

Zeet,

You don't understand the issues...being listed on the ballot is not a "right".

What you DON'T have as a state government, is the right to disenfranchise voters who WANT to vote for whoever THEY select as their nominees, providing they have not been CONVICTED of a serious crime!  And THAT is what you'll be crushed to learn when the SC overturns this liberal cabal of stupid justices!

So what crimes has Trump been convicted of, genius?
 

R.Suave » 21 Dec 2023, 12:32 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 12:32 pm

Only if you predicted the grounds on which they might do so.

But you have no idea of the Law.

Obviously, I've got a better idea of the law than you do!

Or are you SO convinced that the SC will uphold the CO decision to keep Trump off the ballot?
And that's great!  The more certain you are, the harder the kick in the balls will be when it sends you scurrying for your blanky and your coloring book like you snowflakes did the last time Trump kicked your dumb ***!
 

R.Suave » 21 Dec 2023, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 12:35 pm

Zeet,

You don't understand the issues...being listed on the ballot is not a "right".

The [[[JWO]]] is deliberately creating an unfair situation with Trump with the hope that this will incite enough "vigilante recoil" to justify declaring Martial Law and the eventual disarming of the law abiding public.
This is the Long Game that the [[[JWO]]] is playing and they are the masters of doing that.
You fit the mold of someone who will coexist under their full control very nicely and very obediently because you are oblivious to the amount of freedom and self determination that the [[[JWO]]] is  forcing everyone to surrender.
When the store clerk asks 70 year old Black Vegetable to show his photo ID now just to buy a beer he does so cheerfully and willingly like any well indoctrinated Lambchop would.
Not one single thought goes through his head as to what is really going on.
He doesn't realize that he is being "trained" to accept a future society where every aspect of his life will be strictly monitored by Big Brother.
How many vaccine boosters have you submitted to Lamb Chop...?
Are you pacing the room anxiously for them to order you to take the next one too...?       

Zeets2 » 21 Dec 2023, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 12:29 pm

You'll soon be smacked upside your nappy head when the Supreme Court finds that a state DOES NOT have the right to disqualify a candidate who has committed no crime!

But I guess you must enjoy being so humbled.  Next time, why not just visit your dominatrix and ask for the spanking you richly deserv
 

that is right. what does that have to do with trump?

GHETTOBLASTER » 21 Dec 2023, 1:31 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 1:31 pm

The [[[JWO]]] is deliberately creating an unfair situation with Trump with the hope that this will incite enough "vigilante recoil" to justify declaring Martial Law and the eventual disarming of the law abiding public.
This is the Long Game that the [[[JWO]]] is playing and they are the masters of doing that.
You fit the mold of someone who will coexist under their full control very nicely and very obediently because you are oblivious to the amount of freedom and self determination that the [[[JWO]]] is  forcing everyone to surrender.
When the store clerk asks 70 year old Black Vegetable to show his photo ID now just to buy a beer he does so cheerfully and willingly like any well indoctrinated Lambchop would.
Not one single thought goes through his head as to what is really going on.
He doesn't realize that he is being "trained" to accept a future society where every aspect of his life will be strictly monitored by Big Brother.

good god. they are following the constitution. it was trump who wanted martial law.

R.Suave » 21 Dec 2023, 12:25 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 12:25 pm

Duh.

Irrelevant.

He isn't being convicted...

And conviction is not required for disqualification.

You should stop presuming you know more than Colorado justices.

Are you suggesting people can be disqualified from the ballot for no justified nor substantiated reason? Does that not make US democracy open to such horrific abuse, it renders it hardly a democracy at all?

No wonder Putin is laughing his goddamn tits off

jerrab » 21 Dec 2023, 1:34 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 1:34 pm

good god. they are following the constitution. it was trump who wanted martial law.

BS.
Martial Law...?
You don't know WTF Martial Law is. so please STFU
Trump simply wanted extra man power and it was rejected by members of your party  who wanted to see maximum carnage

jerrab » 21 Dec 2023, 1:34 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 1:34 pm

good god. they are following the constitution. it was trump who wanted martial law.

You still believe MAGA murdered 5 cops and injured 140 other cops badly enough to require medical attention..?
Anyone like you who believes such nonsense isn't even qualified to comment here.

JustinSane » 21 Dec 2023, 1:35 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 1:35 pm

Are you suggesting people can be disqualified from the ballot for no justified nor substantiated reason? Does that not make US democracy open to such horrific abuse, it renders it hardly a democracy at all?

No wonder Putin is laughing his goddamn tits off

for no justified nor substantiated reason?

nyet, tovarish.

Reasons were provided...

Consistent with reasoning offered from other benches.

GHETTOBLASTER » 21 Dec 2023, 1:41 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 1:41 pm

You still believe MAGA murdered 5 cops and injured 140 other cops badly enough to require medical attention..?
Anyone like you who believes such nonsense isn't even qualified to comment here.

How much of the Jan 6th hearings did you watch?

GHETTOBLASTER » 21 Dec 2023, 1:38 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 1:38 pm

BS.
Martial Law...?
You don't know WTF Martial Law is. so please STFU
Trump simply wanted extra man power and it was rejected by members of your party  who wanted to see maximum carnage

You have no idea what you're talking about..