Liberal Forum

JustinSane » 21 Dec 2023, 3:33 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 3:33 pm

What?... which bit are you actually disputing?

Your entire premise.
 

R.Suave » 21 Dec 2023, 3:38 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 3:38 pm

Your entire premise.

So when I said 'What actually happened is **** important when it comes to making decisions based on what actually happened' - you're disputing that?

JustinSane » 21 Dec 2023, 3:40 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 3:40 pm

So when I said 'What actually happened is **** important when it comes to making decisions based on what actually happened' - you're disputing that?

No....but whether or not it must be determined by a conviction is.

 

R.Suave » 21 Dec 2023, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 3:42 pm

No....but whether or not it must be determined by a conviction is.

That is how crimes are determined in a legal setting.

R.Suave » 21 Dec 2023, 3:27 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 3:27 pm

No, I just did...

You spewed a pile of uninformed crap not worthy of a more detailed response.

No you didn’t.  Nothing but ignorant ad hominens.  It’s all you got,

your nothing but an ignorant legacy admission to a school most people couldn’t find on a map.

R.Suave » 21 Dec 2023, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 3:42 pm

No....but whether or not it must be determined by a conviction is.

Where are all these insurrection convictions?  This is the insurrection that wasn’t.

Huey » 21 Dec 2023, 3:47 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 3:47 pm

Where are all these insurrection convictions?  This is the insurrection that wasn’t.

This is how stupid you are.

I keep telling you that a conviction is not required under the Amendment.
 

Huey » 21 Dec 2023, 3:46 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 3:46 pm

No you didn’t.  Nothing but ignorant ad hominens.  It’s all you got,

your nothing but an ignorant legacy admission to a school most people couldn’t find on a map.

Sure..

So restate your "argument" in 3 concise bullet points 

JustinSane » 21 Dec 2023, 3:44 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 3:44 pm

That is how crimes are determined in a legal setting.

Disqualification is not a criminal sanction.
 

R.Suave » 21 Dec 2023, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 3:54 pm

Sure..

So restate your "argument" in 3 concise bullet points

It’s a matter of record, ignorant one.

GHETTOBLASTER » 21 Dec 2023, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 2:50 pm

By submitting this article...you just admitted right here that this was Gen Flynn talking hypothetically instead of your earlier claim that Trump tried to institute martial law for Jan 6.
Thanks for proving what a desperate liar you are and someone who simply isn't qualified to be discussing this topic.

I said he wanted to institute martial law.

Huey » 21 Dec 2023, 4:01 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 4:01 pm

It’s a matter of record, ignorant one.

As a matter of record I called it out as hysterical crap.

Unless you can show how any of it is true, it will remain crap.


 

Huey » 21 Dec 2023, 3:47 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 3:47 pm

Where are all these insurrection convictions?  This is the insurrection that wasn’t.

--------------------------------------------

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/05/3 ... g-00099158

Stewart Rhodes, the leader of the far-right Oath Keepers, last week was sentenced to 18 years in prison for seditious conspiracy — the longest sentence imposed on a Jan. 6 defendant to date.Prosecutors say Rhodes planned a weekslong effort to derail the transfer of power from Donald Trump to Joe Biden, leading to the organization of dozens of allies to descend on Washington on Jan. 6, 2021. Rhodes was convicted in November.
 

jerrab » 21 Dec 2023, 4:04 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 4:04 pm

--------------------------------------------

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/05/3 ... g-00099158

Stewart Rhodes, the leader of the far-right Oath Keepers, last week was sentenced to 18 years in prison for seditious conspiracy — the longest sentence imposed on a Jan. 6 defendant to date.Prosecutors say Rhodes planned a weekslong effort to derail the transfer of power from Donald Trump to Joe Biden, leading to the organization of dozens of allies to descend on Washington on Jan. 6, 2021. Rhodes was convicted in November.

Even if I give you that one you got ONE.  Where are all these insurrection charges?  

you gotta do better than this, bruh.

Zeets2 » 21 Dec 2023, 3:09 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 3:09 pm

Very simple!  The Supreme Court will reverse the Colorado decision and they'll be required to put Trump's name on the ballot.

How is it that you think this has nothing to do with Trump?  What is it that don't you understand?

like  I said it has nothing to do with trump

Zeets2 » Today, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑
Today, 11:29 am
You'll soon be smacked upside your nappy head when the Supreme Court finds that a state DOES NOT have the right to disqualify a candidate who has committed no crime!

But I guess you must enjoy being so humbled.  Next time, why not just visit your dominatrix and ask for the spanking you richly deserv

Huey » 21 Dec 2023, 4:09 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 4:09 pm

Even if I give you that one you got ONE.  Where are all these insurrection charges?  

you gotta do better than this, bruh.

maga mantra ---deny deny deny

jerrab » 21 Dec 2023, 4:12 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 4:12 pm

maga mantra ---deny deny deny

You are doing the denying, lil man.  Where are the insurrection convictions?

I await your next diversion, bruh.

Huey » 21 Dec 2023, 4:09 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 4:09 pm

Even if I give you that one you got ONE.  Where are all these insurrection charges?  

you gotta do better than this, bruh.

--------------------------------------

Sedition is overt conduct, such as speech or organization, that tends toward rebellion against the established order. Sedition often includes subversion of a constitution and incitement of discontent toward, or insurrection against, established authority.

Huey » 21 Dec 2023, 4:16 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 4:16 pm

You are doing the denying, lil man.  Where are the insurrection convictions?

I await your next diversion, bruh.

ha- 

-------------------------------------------------------

What is the insurrection and Sedition Act?
Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the ...

jerrab » 21 Dec 2023, 4:24 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 4:24 pm

ha- 

-------------------------------------------------------

What is the insurrection and Sedition Act?
Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the ...

Um, dum dum, I didn’t asked you what it is.  I asked you for all the insurrection charges/convictions.

so far, 0.