Liberal Forum

jerrab » 21 Dec 2023, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 4:02 pm

I said he wanted to institute martial law.

Show proof that this is true. So far all you have done is to show proof that General Flynn mentioned Martial Law as what General Flynn would like to do.
BTW...does a totally delusional and confused serial liar such as yourself also happen to be a Queer Man...?
Just curious.

Huey » 21 Dec 2023, 4:27 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 4:27 pm

Um, dum dum, I didn’t asked you what it is.  I asked you for all the insurrection charges/convictions.

so far, 0.

Who the **** are you calling "dum dum", you **** imbecile.

A CONVICTION IS NOT REQUIRED TO DISQUALIFY GRIFTY FROM THE COLORADO BALLOT.


Nod.

GHETTOBLASTER » 21 Dec 2023, 4:36 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 4:36 pm

Show proof that this is true. So far all you have done is to show proof that General Flynn mentioned Martial Law as what General Flynn would like to do.
BTW...does a totally delusional and confused serial liar such as yourself also happen to be a Queer Man...?
Just curious.

How much of the Jan 6th hearings did you watch?
 

R.Suave » 21 Dec 2023, 4:37 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 4:37 pm

Who the **** are you calling "dum dum", you **** imbecile.

A CONVICTION IS NOT REQUIRED TO DISQUALIFY GRIFTY FROM THE COLORADO BALLOT.

Nod.

Got it. 

I know you have comprehension issues, but we are discussing a supposed insurrection with no insurrection convictions, Legacy.

thanks for your unsolicited input;
 

Huey » 21 Dec 2023, 4:43 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 4:43 pm

Got it. 

I know you have comprehension issues, but we are discussing a supposed insurrection with no insurrection convictions, Legacy.

thanks for your unsolicited input;

supposed insurrection with no insurrection convictions, Legacy

but you don't understand the legal definition of Insurrection.

Or much of anything else for that matter.

R.Suave » 21 Dec 2023, 4:38 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 4:38 pm

How much of the Jan 6th hearings did you watch?

Only  totally brainwashed Little ****** Bitches like you buy into the false narrative that MAGA was planning to overthrow the US Government with a couple dozen flag poles, pocket knives, a fire cracker and some cans of bear spray. Oh yeah...you also buy into the ridiculous notion that MAGA could have dragged Pence past 100s of well armed Capitol Cops to a Hang Man's Noose for not being able to decertify the results of the election..........        


 
 

GHETTOBLASTER » 21 Dec 2023, 4:50 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 4:50 pm

Only  totally brainwashed Little ****** Bitches like you buy into the false narrative that MAGA was planning to overthrow the US Government with a couple dozen flag poles, pocket knives, a fire cracker and some cans of bear spray. Oh yeah...you also buy into the ridiculous notion that MAGA could have dragged Pence past 100s of well armed Capitol Cops to a Hang Man's Noose for refusing to decertify the results of the election..........        

How would you know?

Huey » 21 Dec 2023, 4:43 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 4:43 pm

Got it. 

I know you have comprehension issues, but we are discussing a supposed insurrection with no insurrection convictions, Legacy.

thanks for your unsolicited input;

After a five‐​day trial in November, a Denver district court concluded that President Trump had engaged in insurrection as used in Section 3 

https://www.cato.org/blog/agree-it-or-n ... h-judicial

R.Suave » 21 Dec 2023, 4:45 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 4:45 pm

but you don't understand the legal definition of Insurrection.

Or much of anything else for that matter.

I do.

i don’t really care. Like you I am not a lawyer,  I don’t live in Co, I’m not voting for Trump, and the SCOTUS will most likely overturn this.  

I just hope it is a 9-0 decision so I don’t have to hear you ignorant assholes rant about it.
 

R.Suave » 21 Dec 2023, 4:52 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 4:52 pm

After a five‐​day trial in November, a Denver district court concluded that President Trump had engaged in insurrection as used in Section 3 

https://www.cato.org/blog/agree-it-or-n ... h-judicial

When is the sentencing hearing?

Shut the **** up, Erkel.

Huey » 21 Dec 2023, 4:54 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 4:54 pm

I do.

i don’t really care. Like you I am not a lawyer,  I don’t live in Co, I’m not voting for Trump, and the SCOTUS will most likely overturn this.  

I just hope it is a 9-0 decision so I don’t have to hear you ignorant assholes rant about it.

You don't even know the facts of the matter.

Huey » 21 Dec 2023, 4:55 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 4:55 pm

When is the sentencing hearing?

Shut the **** up, Erkel.

Are you saying they didn't?

Take your stand before I fetch more confirmation.

R.Suave » 21 Dec 2023, 4:50 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 4:50 pm

How would you know?

Now that you've been reduced to asking your usual assortment of time wasting POUTY  LITTLE ****** BITCH QUESTIONS..it's easy to see that my work is done here.

 
 

Huey » 21 Dec 2023, 4:54 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 4:54 pm

I do.

i don’t really care. Like you I am not a lawyer,  I don’t live in Co, I’m not voting for Trump, and the SCOTUS will most likely overturn this.  

I just hope it is a 9-0 decision so I don’t have to hear you ignorant assholes rant about it.

I just hope it is a 9-0 decision so I don’t have to hear you ignorant assholes rant about it.

If it isn't, why shouldn't you have to eat your stupid?
 

GHETTOBLASTER » 21 Dec 2023, 4:36 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 4:36 pm

Show proof that this is true. So far all you have done is to show proof that General Flynn mentioned Martial Law as what General Flynn would like to do.
BTW...does a totally delusional and confused serial liar such as yourself also happen to be a Queer Man...?
Just curious.

it seems that you are obsessed with gayness and saying I am for no reason leads me to come to the only possible conclusion........

YOU'RE GAY!!!!!!!

R.Suave » 21 Dec 2023, 4:52 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 4:52 pm

After a five‐​day trial in November, a Denver district court concluded that President Trump had engaged in insurrection as used in Section 3 

https://www.cato.org/blog/agree-it-or-n ... h-judicial

You take great glee in supporting this ridiculousness.
Nothing Trump did passes the feasibility test.
If Trump really did command  his military to seize control of the US Government ..then every court in the land would have charged him with insurrection by now.

R.Suave » 21 Dec 2023, 4:57 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 4:57 pm

If it isn't, why shouldn't you have to eat your stupid?

I haven’t posted any stupid, Legacy.

so far you can’t refute it.

the insurrection that wasn’t.  As I said, I have seen real life insurrection.  

if that happened here you would run bc and hide.  You ain’t man enough to handle it.  Go cuddle with your gay ski pants.
 

jerrab » 21 Dec 2023, 5:04 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 5:04 pm

it seems that you are obsessed with gayness and saying I am for no reason leads me to come to the only possible conclusion........

YOU'RE GAY!!!!!!!

Here you go again with another lie......  
I NEVER SAID THAT YOU ARE GAY
I ASKED YOU IF YOU ARE GAY.
HUGE DIFFERENCE to those of us who respect the truth.
Can't you see that you are such a habitual, serial liar that you can't tell the difference between what is true and what is false...?
 

Huey » 21 Dec 2023, 4:27 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 4:27 pm

Um, dum dum, I didn’t asked you what it is.  I asked you for all the insurrection charges/convictions.

so far, 0.

What is the insurrection and Sedition Act?
Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the 

jerrab » 21 Dec 2023, 5:10 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2023, 5:10 pm

What is the insurrection and Sedition Act?
Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the

Repost:

Um, dum dum, I didn’t asked you what it is.  I asked you for all the insurrection charges/convictions.


Come bruh, so far this is the insurrection that wasn't.....You had a few violent **** who got what they deserved but most were convicted of illegal parading and trespass.