Liberal Forum

Huey » 22 Dec 2023, 2:36 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Dec 2023, 2:36 pm

Oh, my bad.  You do admit (finally) the he did tell them to march peacefully to the capital.....

You lied, yes....We knew that.

Thanks for admitting it.

But why lie again?
 

R.Suave » 22 Dec 2023, 2:29 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Dec 2023, 2:29 pm

No, you haven't....

Committee members spoke less than 30% of the time.

Can you identify 4 witnesses?

Oh for ****'s sakes. I'm sorry, but I actually have named my sources. And who cares if it was another channel streaming it live on YouTube? - it's all the same proceedings.

You don't have legal proceedings made up of a courtroom filled with people who want to see the defendant hanged before the first word has been spoken - for good reason. 'We called witnesses' is not a defence - no one would accept the outcome as valid, if everything the court wanted magically turned out to be true. And even if it didn't, it still wouldn't be accepted

To raise this shower of assholes to the point that the outcome of their hearings is used to make legal decisions, is to covertly raise them to the level of a kangaroo court. It is stacking horse-**** on horse-****

R.Suave » 22 Dec 2023, 2:37 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Dec 2023, 2:37 pm

You lied, yes....We knew that.

Thanks for admitting it.

But why lie again?

Thank you for finally taking a stand and admitting Trump did tell them to march peacefully to the capital.  

Huey » 22 Dec 2023, 2:38 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Dec 2023, 2:38 pm

Thank you for finally taking a stand and admitting Trump did tell them to march peacefully to the capital.

Post my words to that effect, or admit that you're lying....again.

You are one of the dumbest **** alive...they are state Supreme Court justices.

R.Suave » 22 Dec 2023, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Dec 2023, 2:43 pm

Post my words to that effect, or admit that you're lying....again.

You are one of the dumbest **** alive...they are state Supreme Court justices.

 

You aren't admitting it?  Take a stand.  Either he did or didn't.

You are one of the dumbest **** alive...they are state Supreme Court justices.  Who are about to be overturned.
 

R.Suave » 22 Dec 2023, 2:24 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Dec 2023, 2:24 pm

No...that's the kind of **** only someone credulous enough to believe the sources you are too ashamed to name would spew.

The VAST majority of witnesses were from the Administration.

Where is the evidence that validates their testimony .......right  now?


 

Huey » 22 Dec 2023, 2:45 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Dec 2023, 2:45 pm

You aren't admitting it?  Take a stand.  Either he did or didn't.

You are one of the dumbest **** alive...they are state Supreme Court justices.  Who are about to be overturned.

Don't get confused.

You're lying.

it's not about whether he said "march peacefully"....it's about how **** stupid those who repeat it as if it means something are proving to be.

You're one of them, but the fact that you're unapologetically **** stupid is already well established.

Nod.
 

R.Suave » 22 Dec 2023, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Dec 2023, 2:55 pm

Don't get confused.

You're lying.

it's not about whether he said "march peacefully"....it's about how **** stupid those who repeat it as if it means something are proving to be.

You're one of them, but the fact that you're unapologetically **** stupid is already well established.

Nod.

Actually, it is about it and you have ignored it for years because you know it hurts your argument.  Did he say it or not?

Majik » 22 Dec 2023, 2:51 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Dec 2023, 2:51 pm

Where is the evidence that validates their testimony .......right  now?

At this point all stands as fact because there is nothing to contradict it.

And for reasons you can't understand, nothing is forthcoming.
 

Huey » 22 Dec 2023, 2:56 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Dec 2023, 2:56 pm

Actually, it is about it and you have ignored it for years because you know it hurts your argument.  Did he say it or not?

It doesn't...

That is currently a settled matter of fact.

That's what courts do.

Your fee-fees don't matter.
 

R.Suave » 22 Dec 2023, 3:00 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Dec 2023, 3:00 pm

It doesn't...

That is currently a settled matter of fact.

That's what courts do.

Your fee-fees don't matter.

Neither do you yours.  I will say that yes, trump will be on the ballot in CO.

R.Suave » 22 Dec 2023, 2:33 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Dec 2023, 2:33 pm

We agree that they had the power and duty....that's why it is so stupid for you to call them "idiots"

Man, but you're thick!
I DON'T BELIEVE they had the power OR the duty to make a blatant political ploy to try to keep Trump off the ballot, and I never said otherwise!
And they and you are ALL idiots for thinking that they did!

Are we clear now?
 

Huey » 22 Dec 2023, 3:01 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Dec 2023, 3:01 pm

Neither do you yours.  I will say that yes, trump will be on the ballot in CO.

My fee-fees aren't at issue...that's the decision of the Colorado Supreme Court.

trump will be on the ballot in CO.

We know that already, because the ballots will be printed while the decision is appealed....nice sleuthing.

What you WON'T get is anything from SCOTUS challenging the established facts....one of which is that Grifty incited the insurrection.

 

Zeets2 » 22 Dec 2023, 3:09 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Dec 2023, 3:09 pm

Man, but you're thick!
I DON'T BELIEVE they had the power OR the duty to make a blatant political ploy to try to keep Trump off the ballot , and I never said otherwise!
And they and you are ALL idiots for thinking that they did!

Are we clear now?

You should learn to communicate.

to make a blatant political ploy to try to keep Trump off the ballot

They would never had heard the case had Grifty not appealed the case originally brought by Colorado REPUBLICANS.

Are we clear now?

Never doubted that you are a moron, Zeet.

Sumela » 22 Dec 2023, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Dec 2023, 3:35 pm

You just can’t stay away.
 

R.Suave » 22 Dec 2023, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Dec 2023, 2:21 pm

His citation makes liars of both of them.

They can't read.

They're idiots.

they can read simple english. they think they can brainwash people into thinking that trump wanted a peaceful demonstration even though while it was happening he was laughing and was ecstatic that his supporters were beating cops for him, and during it he tweeted that pence was not going to the right thing  and that enraged them even more.