R. » wrote:You ALWAYS run from your words, HooooeyVaginaHuey » 23 Dec 2023, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑ I haven’t run from my words. I admitted I was wrong and corrected it. You? Not so much.
R. » wrote:It was a lie..
HoooooeyVagina.
That's right. Just put the panties back - washed and folded.
If you believed it, you would not be terrified of the man.
SPONSORS!Blackvegetable'sMom » 23 Dec 2023, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑ That's right. Just put the panties back - washed and folded.
All is forgiven.
From one Hole to another.Z09 » 23 Dec 2023, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑ Exactly...
Somehow America hates Trump but they don't want Trump on the ballot
It isn't fear.
How about I show you a crowd of people soiling their pants in fear?Z09 » 23 Dec 2023, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑ What charges?
Show us where he's charged...
And then convicted...
We'll be waiting
He's under 4 criminal indictments in various jurisdictions...Z09 » 23 Dec 2023, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑ What charges?
Show us where he's charged...
And then convicted...
We'll be waiting
Remember that precedent Barr was talking about? The one you laughed at? Tex, Fl and a few other states are tossing around the idea for Biden. Remember, no due process is needed. No Jury needed. We can only hope the USSC overturns the CO decision. Lefties NEVER think about what happens next.R.Suave » 22 Dec 2023, 5:02 pm » wrote: ↑ He pointed out that this will be determined, not on facts, but procedure. The existing procedure in Colorado was followed. SCOTUS will have to determine it contrary to the US constitution.
The original process was validated, with respect to Colorado law, by the recent decision.
The comment about "hearsay" is complete, and condescending, ****. As you have been repeatedly told, the hearings featured testimony from people present at events, reporting first hand experience. Colorado jurists are perfectly competent to sort hearsay from corroborated 1st hand accounts.
As you dutifully averted your eyes from it, don't presume to suggest anything to the contrary.
NEILCAR » 23 Dec 2023, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑ stupid dem logic ...
At most it was a demonstration
... and going by some of the lib progressive demonstrations I've seen ... it was mostly peaceful (of course the police did shoot and kill an unarmed women) ...
A group of people armed with flag poles demonstrated against the US Government ... and the end result was they delayed a certification of an election by a couple of hours ...
Which is why there is no charge and no conviction...
The really stupid thing is the January 6 dem show pony committee set out to prove 12 things ... none of which were illegal.
... stupid is as ...
It is what YOU define as fear.Z09 » 23 Dec 2023, 10:40 am » wrote: ↑ There you go again...
You want 4 Demcorats to pick and choose whose on the ballot...
And has Trump been charged...?
Convicted?
Doesn't have to be in your mind
R.Suave » 23 Dec 2023, 10:45 am » wrote: ↑ It is what YOU define as fear.
4 democrats didn't....you can stop lying about that now.
Very HoooooeyVagina....to go on, for days, about your lie.Huey » 23 Dec 2023, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑ Have you stopped lying about the political makeup of the majority?
I did make a mistake. I assumed, due to their backgrounds, the were registered democrats. I then my corrected my mistake. You? Not so much. Let me know when you man up.R.Suave » 23 Dec 2023, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑ Very HoooooeyVagina....to go on, for days, about your lie.
But you did the "manly" thing and called it a "mistake", Sheilagh...
It's, like, imitation processed cheese food.
Z09 » 23 Dec 2023, 7:01 am » wrote: ↑ I don't think you realize how dangerous this is...
Trump has not been charged or convicted of anything in regard to January 6th.
But through the eyes of Trump haters it's in opening to stop him for being president again.
Why can't Biden be thrown off the ballot for commiting treason?
the steal that he claimed was a lie. this is incitement. the georgia case proves he knew it was a lie all the time. his speech was pure incitement and so was the tweet during the insurrection about pence not doing what trump wanted. this caused the mob to get even more angry and tried to kill the vice president.Huey » 23 Dec 2023, 11:41 am » wrote: ↑ But not for insurrection or treason. Which the provision of the 14th under dispute is talking about.
Z09 » 23 Dec 2023, 11:43 am » wrote: ↑ Here's why you're wrong
Has Trump been charged and convicted?
Very easy question...
So that would mean three republicans can say Biden committed treason and throw him off the ballot in their state....
Understand now?
jerrab » 23 Dec 2023, 12:18 pm » wrote: ↑ the steal that he claimed was a lie. this is incitement. the georgia case proves he knew it was a lie all the time. his speech was pure incitement and so was the tweet during the insurrection about pence not doing what trump wanted. this caused the mob to get even more angry and tried to kill the vice president.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Federal prosecutors have charged Donald Trump with conspiring to seize a second term after losing the 2020 election, alleging a months-long campaign of deceit and abuses that ended with him sitting idly while a violent mob of his supporters attacked the Capitol.In a 45-page indictment unveiled Tuesday, special counsel Jack Smith charged Trump with four felony counts, including conspiracy to defraud the United States and conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding. The indictment also accused Trump of trying to exploit the violent Jan. 6, 2021, assault on Congress to continue his effort to cling to power.