R.Suave » 20 Dec 2023, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑ Just ONE occasion where you didn't find yourself blinded by a stream of my urine....
Just ONE instance where you posted something worth reading.
R.Suave » 20 Dec 2023, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑ Just ONE instance where you posted something worth reading.
No demands.
But you've already lost two...Vegas » 20 Dec 2023, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑ It's not a demand, you **** moron. It's a challenge. You either accept or you cry...like you usually do.
Challenge.
1. Same lies.
Just as predicted. Same lies.R.Suave » 20 Dec 2023, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑ But you've already lost two...
And you're trying to pull a "Double Grifty"...
You gotta qualify, just to be considered.
Are you denying that you were judged, twice?
What did I say that isn't true?R.Suave » 20 Dec 2023, 8:18 am » wrote: ↑ because I know the **** you post isn't worth reading, I glossed past the mindnumbing stupidity of this statement.
Wow...you're a world class moron..
Vegas » 20 Dec 2023, 11:35 am » wrote: ↑ Are you denying that I was judged twice by judges appointed by you without my agreement?
We already went through this. You stalling with the same **** won't stop this.
Challenge.
1. Same lies.
no...you were.Are you denying that I was judged twice by judges
R.Suave » 20 Dec 2023, 11:42 am » wrote: ↑ no...you were.
But now we're in agreement.
You were measured and found wanting...I'm not here to bitchsmack palookas...you gotta demonstrate worthiness...
The Impeachment has no bearing on the Court determinations.
You needed to acknowledge that you've lost your challenge, twice.Vegas » 20 Dec 2023, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑ Look at this ****. He cuts off half of what I said to fit his lie. What a POS.
Challenge.
1. Same lies.
R.Suave » 20 Dec 2023, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑ You needed to acknowledge that you've lost your challenge, twice.
The reasons you've invented are solely for the purpose of your own amusement.
Vegas » 20 Dec 2023, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑ You need to acknowledge that I never agreed to your personal illiterate judges.
The reason you are inventing your lies is for the sake of your own cowardice.
Challenge.
1. Same lies.
ffs...your personal illiterate judges.
He stood trial for inciting the insurrection and was found not guilty, gonna be a little hard to keep him off the ballot for a crime he was acquitted for. You'll be disappointed again with the next couple of weeks. Reliably conservative justice Neil Gorsuch has the 10th circuit. Too bad, so sad.R.Suave » 20 Dec 2023, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑ The Impeachment has no bearing on the Court determinations.
How high do you think his poll numbers will go this time. I say 70%.
You're wrong.Vegas » 20 Dec 2023, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑ I am confident that you DMed your illiterate friends and orchestrated it all. You are cowardly enough to do that.
Doesn't matter. It wasn't legit.
Challenge.
1. Same lies.