Liberal Forum

R.Suave » 25 Dec 2023, 12:27 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Dec 2023, 12:27 pm

Wouldn't this be YOU having it both ways, 2Stand?

Look at this ****. This guy can't go even 5 consecutive posts without hiding behind a question/demand. 

The cowardice never ends. 


Challenge. 
1. Same lies
​​​​​​​2. Deflect to pics.

Vegas » 25 Dec 2023, 12:22 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Dec 2023, 12:22 pm

You mean that you spared them your lies? Cool, thanks. 

Speaking of you being a disgusting liar:

Challenge. 
1. Same lies
2. Deflect to pics.

How many times have you lost?

Vegas » 25 Dec 2023, 12:32 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Dec 2023, 12:32 pm

Look at this ****. This guy can't go even 5 consecutive posts without hiding behind a question/demand. 

The cowardice never ends. 

Challenge. 
1. Same lies
2. Deflect to pics.

How scathing were the judges?
 

R.Suave » 25 Dec 2023, 12:34 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Dec 2023, 12:34 pm

How scathing were the judges?

Wouldn't know. We never had any legit ones. 

But you already knew that. Thus, you asked a stupid question, as always. 



Challenge. 
1. Same lies
2. Deflect to pics.

Vegas » 25 Dec 2023, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Dec 2023, 12:35 pm

Wouldn't know. We never had any legit ones. 

But you already knew that. Thus, you asked a stupid question, as always. 

Challenge. 
1. Same lies
2. Deflect to pics.

But you admit there were judges.

Z09 » 25 Dec 2023, 12:36 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Dec 2023, 12:36 pm

Remarkable how you know about other members but just joined a month ago..

Are you sure you're not someone else but changed their name?

Are you chubby?
 

R.Suave » 25 Dec 2023, 12:27 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Dec 2023, 12:27 pm

Wouldn't this be YOU having it both ways, 2Stand?

Not at all.  

R.Suave » 25 Dec 2023, 12:36 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Dec 2023, 12:36 pm

But you admit there were judges.

Change your name to Eggplant. Damn-it!!  
 

Huey » 25 Dec 2023, 12:38 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Dec 2023, 12:38 pm

Not at all.

No...I said it is.

Your rule.
 

R.Suave » 25 Dec 2023, 12:36 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Dec 2023, 12:36 pm

But you admit there were judges.

But...but...but...you refuse to admit that they weren't legit ones. And they were also illiterate. And rigged in your favor. 

Again, you already know that. 

Challenge. 
1. Same lies
2. Deflect to pics.

R.Suave » 25 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm

No...I said it is.

Your rule.

Nobody really gives a damn and what you say or your rules

R.Suave » 25 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm

I love to lie. 

Challenge. 
1. Same lies
2. Deflect to pics.

Huey » 25 Dec 2023, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Dec 2023, 12:49 pm

Nobody really gives a damn and what you say or your rules

Only when I'm quoting you.

Ruh-roh.....temperature's risin...

Huey-1less than a minute ago

 

Huey » 22 Dec 2023, 5:20 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Dec 2023, 5:20 pm

The majority was 2 unaffiliated voters and 2 democrats.

The dissent was 1 republican, 1 democrat, and I unaffiliated.

https://www.cpr.org/2023/12/20/how-colo ... mp-ruling/

Were you speaking of retellings?

@R. Suave  

Huey » 29 Dec 2023, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑

29 Dec 2023, 10:28 am

Were you speaking of retellings?

@R. Suave

I note the question, and cherry picking...

Zero integrity.

R.Suave » 29 Dec 2023, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑

29 Dec 2023, 10:30 am

I note the question, and cherry picking...

Zero integrity.

 

No cherrying picking.  You are busted lying.  

Huey » 29 Dec 2023, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑

29 Dec 2023, 10:33 am

No cherrying picking.  You are busted lying.

Did you post your lie?

R.Suave » 29 Dec 2023, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑

29 Dec 2023, 10:50 am

Did you post your lie?

Oh, you whiny lil bitch.  Wait for it.  

R.Suave » 22 Dec 2023, 5:10 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Dec 2023, 5:10 pm

No, Toady...that, too, is completely uninformed crap you made up on the spot...the identified democrats split 2-2.

 

THere is your lie, by you rules.