Did Colorado not do so?
R.Suave » 19 Apr 2024, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑ Did Colorado not do so?
Are you upset at seeing @Vegas skewered by his own stupid?
They tried... and failed miserably.
Post the thread title.
No, they did so.
The SCOTUS corrected Colorado's retelling of the Constitution.
Colorado was consistent....SCOTUS isn't.*rippy38 » 19 Apr 2024, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑ The SCOTUS corrected Colorado's retelling of the Constitution.
Not relevant. It was overturned.
So... Colorado consistently tries to kick leading Presidential candidates off their ballots because they prefer the other guy?
More feefees.*rippy38 » 19 Apr 2024, 11:33 am » wrote: ↑ So... Colorado consistently tries to kick leading Presidential candidates off their ballots because they prefer the other guy?
Of all people, you must never presume to tell anyone what is "relevant".
You can argue all you want about the CO decision but the fact of the matter is it was overturned.R.Suave » 19 Apr 2024, 11:35 am » wrote: ↑ Of all people, you must never presume to tell anyone what is "relevant".
Huey's judgement is final.R.Suave » 19 Apr 2024, 11:35 am » wrote: ↑ Of all people, you must never presume to tell anyone what is "relevant".
I didn't use the word, you did.*rippy38 » 19 Apr 2024, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑ I'm just trying to find out what you meant by "consistently".
I guess you're just gonna run... as usual.
No...only your eyes...
I'm not going to ask if these are your words since you JUST TYPED THEM...R.Suave » 19 Apr 2024, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑ I didn't use the word, you did.
When you've explained to yourself why, to your satisfaction, get back to me.
LOL
*rippy38 » 19 Apr 2024, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑ I'm not going to ask if these are your words since you JUST TYPED THEM...
LOL
are these your words?I'm just trying to find out what you meant by "consistently".
Spin cycle engaged...