Goodnight, Rock.
Do you understand that the Siena Presidential Survey has nothing to do with the Siena/NYTimes poll?Rock » 19 Dec 2023, 10:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Hello Ode. The purpose of this thread was not so much to talk about polls as it was to point out how the Siena eggheads rated Trump so low in their presidential rankings. This was one of @R. Suave formerly known as @Blackvegetable 's favorite talking point.
R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 10:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Do you understand that the Siena Presidential Survey has nothing to do with the Siena/NYTimes poll?
Somehow, you missed this...Toplines: December 2023 Times/Siena Poll of Registered Voters Nationwide
Is there supposed to be a link in there? I don't see it.R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 10:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Somehow, you missed this...Toplines: December 2023 Times/Siena Poll of Registered Voters Nationwide
Does it require explanation?
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 9:16 pm » wrote: ↑ No, Rock....an entirely different population.
This is their most recent survey of Presidential scholars..
https://scri.siena.edu/2022/06/22/ameri ... and-worst/
you wanna discuss it?
The word was spelled properly, fruit.actionjackson » 19 Dec 2023, 9:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Another dumb **** who doesnt know grammar from spelling.
Dumb ****.
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 9:32 pm » wrote: ↑ First you'd have to look at it..
Then you would have to answer the first question as you are already one behind.
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 10:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Do you understand that the Siena Presidential Survey has nothing to do with the Siena/NYTimes poll?
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 10:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Somehow, you missed this...Toplines: December 2023 Times/Siena Poll of Registered Voters Nationwide
Does it require explanation?
Why?
R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 9:16 pm » wrote: ↑ No, Rock....an entirely different population.
This is their most recent survey of Presidential scholars..
https://scri.siena.edu/2022/06/22/ameri ... and-worst/
you wanna discuss it?
Of course they have credibility....they aren't FOX or the NYPost.Huey » 20 Dec 2023, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑ Siena either has credibility or they don't. Plus, these are registered voters.
R.Suave » 20 Dec 2023, 8:16 am » wrote: ↑ Of course they have credibility....they aren't FOX or the NYPost.
And please don't oblige me to explain the difference between a SURVEY of a select population and a POLL of registered voters.
If you must, first acknowledge that you're stupid.
No...you do...you yapped about "credibility"....you watch FOX, and read the NYPost.Huey » 20 Dec 2023, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑ I really don't need you to explain much. BUT, your survey of a select population KILLED your worse than Buchanan talking point.
But back to the matter at hand. A survey of registered voters is more accurate than a survey of the population in general. Joe ain't doing well. Like I told you on your "the economy is great" threads that news is not getting out to the people as the shop, pay bills and work multiple jobs.
In 3 concise bullet points, try to make that case, this time.your survey of a select population KILLED your worse than Buchanan talking point.
But no one said anything about a "survey of the population in general", you dumb ****.A survey of registered voters is more accurate than a survey of the population in general
R.Suave » 20 Dec 2023, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑ No...you do...you yapped about "credibility"....you watch FOX, and read the NYPost.
You're a moron.
In 3 concise bullet points, try to make that case, this time.
Then reconcile it with "2ndBesty!", Credo...
But no one said anything about a "survey of the population in general", you dumb ****.
And a SURVEY of the "population in general", covering 30 or more categories for every POTUS would take 30 years.
No, you're a moron.Huey » 20 Dec 2023, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑ I'm good, BV. You can make all the points you like. We have been over this over and over and over and over.....