Cannonpointer » 24 Dec 2023, 1:30 pm » wrote: ↑ No.
You want to have a sissy squabble about "consenting adults," while pretending not to understand those "consenting adults" are coming for the kids.
EVEN WHEN THEY CHANT IT, UNDER THAT FLAG: We're here, we're queer, we're coming for your children. Even THAT does not call upon your lost manhood, you weak **** broad.
I will not play into your niggling and squiggling.
I think he's going over the edge, the virulent attacks are more common than not and they're getting more and more foul by the post.Huey » 24 Dec 2023, 1:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Ok, I won't play into your generalizations and one size fits all arguments.
RebelGator » 24 Dec 2023, 1:37 pm » wrote: ↑ I think he's going over the edge, the virulent attacks are more common than not and they're getting more and more foul by the post.
Right right - you reserve the right to support the tranny agenda while ****-talking it out of the side of your mouth like a broad.Huey » 24 Dec 2023, 1:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Ok, I won't play into your generalizations and one size fits all arguments.

RedheadedStranger » 24 Dec 2023, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm thinking Smello must give some really good head and he is trying to impress the boy so he will keep coming back over... but that's just me.
So it's Cannon that gives good head.RebelGator » 24 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Smello is the dummy, Cannon is the ventriloquist.......Jew hate is the act.
He's good though, you can't see his lips move.RedheadedStranger » 24 Dec 2023, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑ So it's Cannon that gives good head.
That makes more sense actually.
You are just as dead from being shot by a tranny as you are a straight soldier.Cannonpointer » 24 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Right right - you reserve the right to support the tranny agenda while ****-talking it out of the side of your mouth like a broad.
And I reserve the right to call your tranny support out.
Every military YOU support has men in dresses and allows *** soldiers to raise the gay flag in conquered lands.
How many POSSIBLE ways are there for you to duck accountability for that, Pelosi-pal?
THIS is what YOU support, you wheedling, panty-dancing cock sucker:
YAWN!!!!!Cannonpointer » 24 Dec 2023, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Everyone understands it - including you.
You hold your breath for the *** because you lack the balls to stand like a man.
You've been a woman for far too many years to quit it now. But you should at least admit to yourself that your manhood is forfeit. Have that much courage.
THANK YOU. Was that so **** hard?Huey » 24 Dec 2023, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑ You are just as dead from being shot by a tranny as you are a straight soldier.
I don't recognize that uniform.

You're a girl. This is what you support:

You can hide your rino **** behind another ism - like libertardianism.Huey » 23 Dec 2023, 2:45 pm » wrote: ↑ I have nothing against trans and gays who are over 18 and not pushing an agenda on kids. It is the libertarian thing to think.
My beef is with the ultraliberals, and with the conjob rinos they have recruited to their side.MackTheFinger » 23 Dec 2023, 6:38 pm » wrote: ↑ .
I will try...when I was in the Army (1980's) there were more than one homosexuals floating about. Everyone knew and nobody seemed to care...it wasn't until thier fence jumping did it become a problem.
.
IMHO cockpointer...your beef is with the ultraliberals; who made it a big deal; even tho none of them would ever join the Service.
What you support, you ******, is a tranny military that put a photo of a gay married *** **** holding a PRIDE FLAG in conquered gaza on its official twitter feed.
Tell us you do not support an army of trans and *** - that's what I want.ConsRule » 24 Dec 2023, 5:56 am » wrote: ↑ What type of response do you want? The OP is an opinion. You are certainly entitled to your opinion. It is exceedingly rare that generalities (like those in the OP) are true. People can find anecdotal evidence to prove or disprove a generality. Believe it if you wish.

And the dick sucker shows photos of ISIS carrying out US mischief.

….wha? ….would like to know what “agreement” that you’re talking about. Don’t remember seeing any vote regarding the war, nor the raping and murdering of women.…Cannonpointer » 24 Dec 2023, 1:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Okay, mensa - hold the **** phone because there's a converse and it matters a great deal.
The issue is not that we are forced to fund issues with which we disagree. The issue is that your agreement is what forces me to fund those issues.
Try to get a rational grip on this. If you are cheering on or defending the rape and murder of women and children, it actually IS a character issue - even if your own character is such that you cannot grasp this.
Try harder, son. Try man-think next time.
What we have seen, in thread after thread, is republican dick suckers making excuses for the murder of Palestinians.jefftec » 24 Dec 2023, 4:57 pm » wrote: ↑ ….wha? ….would like to know what “agreement” that you’re talking about. Don’t remember seeing any vote regarding the war, nor the raping and murdering of women.…
....might as well, tell the American taxpayer to F__k off, you troublemaker.