Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 24 Dec 2023, 6:48 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Dec 2023, 6:48 pm

You support the tranny military. You support "the stutterer's" foreign policy. You suck.

You're quite stupid. I am a US taxpayer. I am raising my voice at *** who support our tranny military and the stutterer's foreign policy.

If our border is being invaded, and our tranny military is AWOL, then what good is our tranny military?

….you’re quite stupid yerself, Gladys. You support the “tranny” military, yo-self with your tax dollars.
​​​​​​…..congrats….pfft…

DeezerShoove » 24 Dec 2023, 7:14 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Dec 2023, 7:14 pm

What I find interesting is the people that say "It makes no difference who's sitting in the Oval Office..." don't seem to realize this very issue highlights why it can make a difference.
Maybe the president IS beholding to his benefactors but that office still carries some weight...
...like civilian CIC of the military.

Biden is a dishrag. His leftie handlers (who will bear NONE of the consequences) are making policy.

…..right there….:.

GHETTOBLASTER » 24 Dec 2023, 7:19 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Dec 2023, 7:19 pm

It seems to me that "militarizing" our southern border would have been made into  a campaign  promise if there was a simple way to do it.
Here are the legal issues.......https://www.thoughtco.com/posse-comitat ... er-3321286

There is no law that prevents our military from responding to an invasion. If there were, there is no jury that would hold anyone responsible for ignoring it, and there is no prosecutor that would put the issue before a jury. 

Rabbinical parsing and niggling is best attended to by jews on saturdays. 

If our border is being invaded, and our tranny military is AWOL, then what good is our tranny military?
 

jefftec » 24 Dec 2023, 7:20 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Dec 2023, 7:20 pm

….you’re quite stupid yerself, Gladys. You support the “tranny” military, yo-self with your tax dollars.
​​​​​​…..congrats….pfft…

Yes, queer, I do. I can't slip ANYTHING past a genius like you, knucklehead. 

If our border is being invaded, and our tranny military is AWOL, then what good is our tranny military?
 

Cannonpointer » 24 Dec 2023, 7:26 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Dec 2023, 7:26 pm

Yes, queer, I do. I can't slip ANYTHING past a genius like you, knucklehead. 

If our border is being invaded, and our tranny military is AWOL, then what good is our tranny military?

…..and like an addict in dire need of an intervention, he (an unapologetic knuckedragger), points the finger at others, instead of his own silly self…..

Cannonpointer » 24 Dec 2023, 7:26 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Dec 2023, 7:26 pm

There is no law that prevents our military from responding to an invasion. If there were, there is no jury that would hold anyone responsible for ignoring it, and there is no prosecutor that would put the issue before a jury. 

Rabbinical parsing and niggling is best attended to by jews on saturdays. 

If our border is being invaded, and our tranny military is AWOL, then what good is our tranny military?

GOOGLE search this..."What prevents our military from responding to the Illegal Alien invasion of the USA...?
this came up https://www.unitedpatriotsofamerica.com ... rders.html
as usual every definition is wide open to interpretation.

GHETTOBLASTER » 24 Dec 2023, 7:37 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Dec 2023, 7:37 pm

GOOGLE search this..."What prevents our military from responding to the Illegal Alien invasion of the USA...?
this came up https://www.unitedpatriotsofamerica.com ... rders.html
as usual every definition is wide open to interpretation.

Which is why it interests me not. It's rabbinical claptrap.

If our border is being invaded, and our tranny military is AWOL, then what good is our tranny military?


 

jefftec » 24 Dec 2023, 7:35 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Dec 2023, 7:35 pm

…..and like an addict in dire need of an intervention, he (an unapologetic knuckedragger), points the finger at others, instead of his own silly self…..

You talking about yourself, fruitcake? I have owned my part in it - I'm a taxpayer. 

You're still deep in it, sucking on biden's foreign policy dick, looking for ways to suck up to the tranny military.

RedheadedStranger » 24 Dec 2023, 6:36 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Dec 2023, 6:36 pm

Ask the Generals... and quit blaming the troops.

The troops do what they are told by their officers.

Only an idiot would get pissed at a corporal for not protecting our border.

I have decided to revisit this post, since it is clear you are missing the point. 

The issue at hand is, OTHER THAN paying your taxes as required by law and good sense, why should you - you personally, as a human being occupying space in time here now (tip of the hat to Omh) - why should YOU "support" a military that does not represent you, protect you, work for you? Why?

I'm not saying you have to BLAME someone. I'm not saying a corporal is RESPONSIBLE for his superiors' misfeasance of duty. I am asking why YOU would ever consider that military "your" military, when it isn't where YOU need it to be, protecting YOUR border?

Let me break it down further for you. You're not particularly rooting for either side in the Yemeni conflict, are ya? Both sides are pretty much nothing to you - right? So if this side's military or that side's military has a success or a failure, you don't give a ****. Agreed?

Now, here is what I am suggesting. If the United States Tranny military got six of its ships and 500 of its men and two of its bases blown to **** tomorrow, I am asking why you should give a ****, since it is not YOUR military? Since it doesn't protect YOUR border?

If our border is being invaded, and our tranny military is AWOL, then what good is our tranny military?
 

Cannonpointer » 24 Dec 2023, 7:49 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Dec 2023, 7:49 pm

Which is why it interests me not. It's rabbinical claptrap.

If our border is being invaded, and our tranny military is AWOL, then what good is our tranny military?

That last link are the arguments FOR using the military.

GHETTOBLASTER » 24 Dec 2023, 8:24 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Dec 2023, 8:24 pm

That last link are the arguments FOR using the military.

No, the INVASION OF OUR COUNTRY is the **** argument for using the military.

Like I said, I don't **** with rabbinical wheedling, fer OR agin my argument. I leave all of that be. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ma1autOZcPc

If our border is being invaded, and our tranny military is AWOL, then what good is our tranny military?

 
 

Cannonpointer » 24 Dec 2023, 7:50 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Dec 2023, 7:50 pm

You talking about yourself, fruitcake? I have owned my part in it - I'm a taxpayer. 

You're still deep in it, sucking on biden's foreign policy dick, looking for ways to suck up to the tranny military.

…..and there you are:  …..you’re a taxpayer; funding the very things that you detest…. run run Flikka, into the night…..
 

Cannonpointer » 24 Dec 2023, 6:55 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Dec 2023, 6:55 pm

There are a WHOLE BUNCH of dick sucking repukes you need to inform about that. Right here in this thread we have soldier kissers who think the tranny military is THEIR military.

If our border is being invaded, and our tranny military is AWOL, then what good is our tranny military?

These **** retards haven't yet clued in that America died the day the election was stolen and  a coup was committed ....
A coup that has global consequences for every human being on  the planet......
Especially here in North America ....
They haven't yet clued in that their lives will change drastically for being so **** retarded ....
-Cannon I fought for this country , Bled for this country ....and killed for this country ...
The Democrats and the cowardly Republicans -are basically handing this country over to a foreign agenda which if totally implimented would be the death of North America let alone America.
and thesee **** retards don't **** know who their real enemy is .....
and how they operate ....
it's sickening. ..
If not outright insulting .....
I am going to have another Scotch on this Christmas Eve ......
While I contemplate what can be done to reverse this Trend ...
Merry Christmas .....



 

jefftec » 24 Dec 2023, 8:43 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Dec 2023, 8:43 pm

…..and there you are:  …..you’re a taxpayer; funding the very things that you detest…. run run Flikka, into the night…..

Yes. I am forced to watch my taxes used to fund ethnic cleansing and forced perversions - because of scum like you. 

I don't run, ***. Your manhood ran - long ago. 

If our border is being invaded, and our tranny military is AWOL, then what good is our tranny military?

 
 

Majik » 24 Dec 2023, 9:11 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Dec 2023, 9:11 pm

These **** retards haven't yet clued in that America died the day the election was stolen and  a coup was committed ....
A coup that has global consequences for every human being on  the planet......
Especially here in North America ....
They haven't yet clued in that their lives will change drastically for being so **** retarded ....
-Cannon I fought for this country , Bled for this country ....and killed for this country ...

Sweet **** Jesus, bro - you are one rare Hebrew.

Majik » 24 Dec 2023, 9:11 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Dec 2023, 9:11 pm

The Democrats and the cowardly Republicans -are basically handing this country over to a foreign agenda which if totally implimented would be the death of North America let alone America.
and thesee **** retards don't **** know who their real enemy is .....
and how they operate ....
it's sickening. ..
If not outright insulting .....
I am going to have another Scotch on this Christmas Eve ......
While I contemplate what can be done to reverse this Trend ...
Merry Christmas .....

Merry Christmas, brother.

Cannonpointer » 24 Dec 2023, 8:31 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Dec 2023, 8:31 pm

No, the INVASION OF OUR COUNTRY is the **** argument for using the military.

Like I said, I don't **** with rabbinical wheedling, fer OR agin my argument. I leave all of that be. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ma1autOZcPc

If our border is being invaded, and our tranny military is AWOL, then what good is our tranny military?

Here...I'll post some of the the content... 

The Posse Comitatus Act does not prohibit US Military on our borders.
 US Military is allowed as authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress        This is from Carlton Meyer’s new book:  The Spectrum of Future Warfare.
http://www.g2mil.com/border.htmMyth #1 The US Constitution prohibits posting US troops on the border.The US Constitution says no such thing.  In fact, Article IV states:        Section 4. The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government, and shall protect each of them against invasion; and on application of the legislature, or of the executive (when the legislature cannot be convened) against domestic violence.     So the US Constitution clearly requires the federal government to protect states from invasion.  Almost a million aliens illegally pouring across the border into states each year is clearly an invasion.      Myth #2 The Posse Comitatus Act prohibits US troops from guarding US borders.  This 1878 act was enacted to prevent Union troops from continuing to enforce federal laws in the defeated South after the American Civil war.  Here is the text as modified by Congress in recent years:Sec. 1385. – Use of Army and Air Force as posse comitatusWhoever, except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress, willfully uses any part of the Army or the Air Force as a posse comitatus or otherwise to execute the laws shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.Guarding US borders from foreign invasion is not “law enforcement.” The US Army exists to defend the US from foreign invasion, which is expressly authorized by the US Constitution.  Guarding the Mexican border was the Army’s primary peacetime mission until 1940, and no one ever declared this was in violation of this 1878 act.  The US Border Patrol wasn’t even formed until 1924, so claiming the intent of this law was to prevent US Army troops from guarding the border is absurd.  The map at left shows US Army forts in Texas in the late 1880s when the entire US Army had fewer than 40,000 soldiers; it has 500,000 today.  Clearly, defending the US border was a primary mission of the US Army for decades after this act was passed.Some may argue that Chapter 18, Section 375 of Title 10 US Code prevents military personnel from direct participation in law enforcement.  However, defending US borders from foreign invaders is not law enforcement, it’s the basic purpose of the US military.  While defending these United States from invasion, civilian law enforcement may be called upon to assist the US military.  Does anyone believe the Border Patrol must operate fighter aircraft because the US Air Force can’t intercept aircraft crossing into the US because that’s “law enforcement”? When you read about proposals in Congress to put US troops on the border, those are not proposals to allow US troops on the border, but proposals to force the President to put troops back on the border.  However, recent Presidents have listened to their corporate advisors and their slogans and ignored the threat of unsecured US borders.
 
 
 

GHETTOBLASTER » 24 Dec 2023, 9:51 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Dec 2023, 9:51 pm

Here...I'll post some of the the content... 

The Posse Comitatus Act does not prohibit US Military on our borders.
 US Military is allowed as authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress        This is from Carlton Meyer’s new book:  The Spectrum of Future Warfare.
http://www.g2mil.com/border.htmMyth #1 The US Constitution prohibits posting US troops on the border.The US Constitution says no such thing.  In fact, Article IV states:        Section 4. The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government, and shall protect each of them against invasion; and on application of the legislature, or of the executive (when the legislature cannot be convened) against domestic violence.     So the US Constitution clearly requires the federal government to protect states from invasion.  Almost a million aliens illegally pouring across the border into states each year is clearly an invasion.      Myth #2 The Posse Comitatus Act prohibits US troops from guarding US borders.  This 1878 act was enacted to prevent Union troops from continuing to enforce federal laws in the defeated South after the American Civil war.  Here is the text as modified by Congress in recent years:Sec. 1385. – Use of Army and Air Force as posse comitatusWhoever, except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress, willfully uses any part of the Army or the Air Force as a posse comitatus or otherwise to execute the laws shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.Guarding US borders from foreign invasion is not “law enforcement.” The US Army exists to defend the US from foreign invasion, which is expressly authorized by the US Constitution.  Guarding the Mexican border was the Army’s primary peacetime mission until 1940, and no one ever declared this was in violation of this 1878 act.  The US Border Patrol wasn’t even formed until 1924, so claiming the intent of this law was to prevent US Army troops from guarding the border is absurd.  The map at left shows US Army forts in Texas in the late 1880s when the entire US Army had fewer than 40,000 soldiers; it has 500,000 today.  Clearly, defending the US border was a primary mission of the US Army for decades after this act was passed.Some may argue that Chapter 18, Section 375 of Title 10 US Code prevents military personnel from direct participation in law enforcement.  However, defending US borders from foreign invaders is not law enforcement, it’s the basic purpose of the US military.  While defending these United States from invasion, civilian law enforcement may be called upon to assist the US military.  Does anyone believe the Border Patrol must operate fighter aircraft because the US Air Force can’t intercept aircraft crossing into the US because that’s “law enforcement”? When you read about proposals in Congress to put US troops on the border, those are not proposals to allow US troops on the border, but proposals to force the President to put troops back on the border.  However, recent Presidents have listened to their corporate advisors and their slogans and ignored the threat of unsecured US borders.

The purpose of our military WAS to protect our country.

From stuff like invasions.

That is no longer its function - manifestly. 

Why would ANYONE still respect/support it?

If our border is being invaded, and our tranny military is AWOL, then what good is our tranny military?
 

Cannonpointer » 24 Dec 2023, 10:03 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Dec 2023, 10:03 pm

The purpose of our military WAS to protect our country.

From stuff like invasions.

That is no longer its function - manifestly. 

Why would ANYONE still respect/support it?

If our border is being invaded, and our tranny military is AWOL, then what good is our tranny military?

Well hopefully we have enough UNBRAINWASHED PEOPLE to finally stand up and say that the [[[Jew World Order Agenda]]] to create single party loyal societies has come to an end....
Oh wait...what a hopelessly romantic  thing for me to hope for.......          
Many people will come to this realization and become the next Ted Bundys..and this is exactly what the gun grabbin' Illegal Alien Lovin'  [[[JewWorldOrder]]] wants to see happen.
 

jefftec » 24 Dec 2023, 6:28 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Dec 2023, 6:28 pm

….what good is the occupier of the presidency??

Murica has been occupied since JFK was murdered.
 

Cannonpointer » 24 Dec 2023, 6:42 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Dec 2023, 6:42 pm

Hamas has troops who are just following orders, ***.

Same in Iran, homo.

Or for firing a rocket at israel as ordered.

If our border is being invaded, and our tranny military is AWOL, then what good is our tranny military?

 

Old Burnt Out Red....""cucks must follow cucked orders and remained cucked"  UKsepSHUnALjiZM!!