So... if your neighbor threatens to burn your house down, and you whip his *** and/or have him arrested before he can do it, and then he retaliates by burning the whole neighborhood down... then it's your fault the neighborhood was destroyed.Mrkelly » 27 Dec 2023, 6:52 pm » wrote: ↑ then you just destroy the neighborhood/world
by your logic
Still can't separate the end of mankind and a neighborhood assholeRedheadedStranger » 27 Dec 2023, 8:44 pm » wrote: ↑ So... if your neighbor threatens to burn your house down, and you whip his *** and/or have him arrested before he can do it, and then he retaliates by burning the whole neighborhood down... then it's your fault the neighborhood was destroyed.
Sounds logical.
You are the one saying that you would let the neighborhood asshole burn your house down for the good of the neighborhood... not me.Mrkelly » 27 Dec 2023, 8:56 pm » wrote: ↑ Still can't separate the end of mankind and a neighborhood asshole
tell me about corn pop joe
Xavier_Onassis » 27 Dec 2023, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑ There are plenty of Iranians whiter than you are.
We have been hearing that Iran will have nuclear weapons within months for well over a decade.
So, either they have been lying to us, or the Iranians are not interested in developing nukes.
I would deal with a neighborhood asshole that threatened to burn my house downRedheadedStranger » 27 Dec 2023, 9:17 pm » wrote: ↑ You are the one saying that you would let the neighborhood asshole burn your house down for the good of the neighborhood... not me.
Lol
And if your "dealing with" the neighborhood asshole pushed him into burning the whole neighborhood down, then YOU would be responsible for your neighborhood being destroyed.Mrkelly » 28 Dec 2023, 8:14 am » wrote: ↑ I would deal with a neighborhood asshole that threatened to burn my house down
you can’t see the difference in that and starting WWIII
No surprise
you sound like MSM![]()
Tell me about corn pop and what it was like in the old days Joe
Again with the neighborhood stories Joe?RedheadedStranger » 28 Dec 2023, 9:16 am » wrote: ↑ And if your "dealing with" the neighborhood asshole pushed him into burning the whole neighborhood down, then YOU would be responsible for your neighborhood being destroyed.
Your logic.
I accept your concession.Mrkelly » 28 Dec 2023, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑ Again with the neighborhood stories Joe?
you didn’t tell me how tough corn pop was
did he have nuclear powered friends?
could he trigger the end of mankind?
tell me another story Joe
when everyone has a sabre to rattle, the point becomes moot...Mrkelly » 27 Dec 2023, 5:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Iran doesn’t want to get blown off the map
they aren’t stupid enough to destroy Israel
Just like North Korea wouldn’t really nuke us
the US doesn’t want Iran to have the deterrent that NK has
a lot of countries have nukes
a preemptive strike is exact what would start that war you are trying to avoid
the world is just a bigger neighborhood...Mrkelly » 28 Dec 2023, 8:14 am » wrote: ↑ I would deal with a neighborhood asshole that threatened to burn my house down
you can’t see the difference in that and starting WWIII
No surprise
you sound like MSM![]()
Tell me about corn pop and what it was like in the old days Joe
that’s the point of why Iran should get nukesROG62 » 28 Dec 2023, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑ when everyone has a sabre to rattle, the point becomes moot...
but **** with bigger neighbors has different outcomes
generally one doesn't **** with bigger neighbors...
Trump pulling out of the Iran deal just made it more likely.Tempest62 » 26 Dec 2023, 10:29 pm » wrote: ↑ …Enriched to 60%.
Full weapons grade requires 90%. So they’re close. Do they have a means of delivery? At Israel and United States and Europe.
Question: Should Israel conduct pre-emptive strikes at known Iranian sites?
You and that other ignorant communist *** here have much in common.
The only deal that existed was only to delay the inevitable. Plus, Iran cheats like Wash DC in the first place.Bidencrimefamily » 28 Dec 2023, 3:16 pm » wrote: ↑ Trump pulling out of the Iran deal just made it more likely.
A delay is better than excelling it in my book.Tempest62 » 28 Dec 2023, 3:20 pm » wrote: ↑ The only deal that existed was only to delay the inevitable. Plus, Iran cheats like Wash DC in the first place.
The deal meant nothing but to allow Iran to have the upper hand in its finality.
No argument in terms of bare philosophy, but it provided a pathway to make Iran a regional power. I’m sure you’re not all in with the Twelver plan by the merry mullahs in Tehran.