Really?
Smells like fear to me. Fear of taking a stand on the subject.R. » wrote:Is there a rule?Huey » 27 Dec 2023, 5:51 pm » wrote: ↑ On the topic of the thread and taking into consideration your tough stance on gun control and gun laws you must agree that these people should be charged with violating state, local and federal laws.
Nope. Just a hip. I know the difference between a Kydex holster and a gun, in pieces, You don't.R. » wrote:You need both arms...Huey » 27 Dec 2023, 5:30 pm » wrote: ↑ I don’t cradle it. When I carry I wear it. At least I know it is not a gun, in pieces.
Richard, you are dumb.
@HueyR.Suave » 27 Dec 2023, 5:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Melting down is not 4 words..
You, of all people, should know this.
Huey » 27 Dec 2023, 6:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Smells like fear to me. Fear of taking a stand on the subject.
Nope. Just a hip. I know the difference between a Kydex holster and a gun, in pieces, You don't.
Richard, you are dumb.
Hell no...I'll take 4...or 5, 1StandsFear of taking a stand on the subject.
In Mexico they won't even left a good guy with a gun have a gun. The bad guys with the guns shoots them like in Florida.Huey » 27 Dec 2023, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑ New Mexico Anti-Gun Group Likely Violated Law It Championed With Gun Buy-Back Stunt
The law passed in 2019 called for background checks for private transfers of weapons.
The issue popped up last week, as a Townhall.com report spotlighted the New Mexico controversy. According to columnist Kerry Slone, the anti-gun group New Mexicans Against Gun Violence, known as NMPGV, came up with a plan to go door to door with the Farmington Police Department to offer residents gift cards in exchange for their guns. T
he cops backed out because they did not get City Council approval. But NMPGV went forward with the plan.Armed with $26,000 in gift cards, the group petitioned residents by offering $100 gift cards for long guns and pistols, $200 for semi-automatic pistols and rifles, or a $250 gift card for so-called “assault weapons.”Eventually, NMPGV acquired nine guns from residents.The problem was that in doing so, as Slone reported, the group violated a 2019 law that requires background checks for all private firearms sales. Such checks must be performed by federally licensed gun dealers.
https://www.tampafp.com/new-mexico-anti ... ack-stunt/
It also reported they broke federal law:
This one is particularly fun. The rifle was taken in this condition to a local school with the receiver completely intact. It also appears that they’ve cut the barrel down, illegally making an SBR. Taking this weapon to a school is a state felony and making an unregistered and untaxed SBR is at least one more federal crime. https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/new-m ... ce-system/
Dang! I had those moves down when I was 16!
including the last one?
Oh, most definitely including the last one!
Huey » 27 Dec 2023, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑ It was a gun cite. But, this is the article I chose for verification. And no, you are not going to hijack this thread with your deflection over sources. The story is true and sound like some of the dumb **** you pull or support.
Like anyone else they should be charged.
more than likely why you remember it so vividly...